BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the UK. Patients with colorectal cancer spend most of their time in the community, but the role of primary care in their management and follow-up is unclear. AIM: To explore colorectal cancer patients' experiences of psychosocial problems and their management in primary and specialist care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Longitudinal qualitative study of participants recruited from three hospitals in the west of Scotland and interviewed in their own homes. METHOD: In-depth interviews with 24 participants with a new diagnosis of colorectal cancer, and then follow-up interviews 12 months later. RESULTS: Participants' needs following a diagnosis for colorectal cancer included physical, psychological, and social issues. GPs played a key role in diagnosis, after which they were less involved. Participants valued GPs making unsolicited contact and offering support. Participants described being well supported by clinical nurse specialists who are expert in the illness, and who provide continuity of care and psychological support. A year after diagnosis, when there was less contact with GPs and clinical nurse specialists, participants still faced challenges associated with the ongoing impact of colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: While some patients enjoyed straightforward recoveries from surgery, others experienced longer-term implications from their disease and treatment, particularly bowel-function issues, fatigue, anxiety, and sexual problems. The potential for primary care to contribute more to the ongoing care of colorectal cancer patients was identified.
BACKGROUND:Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the UK. Patients with colorectal cancer spend most of their time in the community, but the role of primary care in their management and follow-up is unclear. AIM: To explore colorectal cancerpatients' experiences of psychosocial problems and their management in primary and specialist care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Longitudinal qualitative study of participants recruited from three hospitals in the west of Scotland and interviewed in their own homes. METHOD: In-depth interviews with 24 participants with a new diagnosis of colorectal cancer, and then follow-up interviews 12 months later. RESULTS:Participants' needs following a diagnosis for colorectal cancer included physical, psychological, and social issues. GPs played a key role in diagnosis, after which they were less involved. Participants valued GPs making unsolicited contact and offering support. Participants described being well supported by clinical nurse specialists who are expert in the illness, and who provide continuity of care and psychological support. A year after diagnosis, when there was less contact with GPs and clinical nurse specialists, participants still faced challenges associated with the ongoing impact of colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: While some patients enjoyed straightforward recoveries from surgery, others experienced longer-term implications from their disease and treatment, particularly bowel-function issues, fatigue, anxiety, and sexual problems. The potential for primary care to contribute more to the ongoing care of colorectal cancerpatients was identified.
Authors: N M Gray; S J Hall; S Browne; U Macleod; E Mitchell; A J Lee; M Johnston; S Wyke; L Samuel; D Weller; N C Campbell Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-05-10 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: L E Carlson; M Angen; J Cullum; E Goodey; J Koopmans; L Lamont; J H MacRae; M Martin; G Pelletier; J Robinson; J S A Simpson; M Speca; L Tillotson; B D Bultz Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-06-14 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Julia R Berian; Amanda Cuddy; Amanda B Francescatti; Linda O'Dwyer; Y Nancy You; Robert J Volk; George J Chang Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Marilyn Kendall; Bruce Mason; Natalie Momen; Stephen Barclay; Dan Munday; Roberta Lovick; Stella Macpherson; Euan Paterson; Paul Baughan; Paul Cormie; Peter Kiehlmann; Amanda Free; Scott A Murray Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 2.267
Authors: Judith A Meiklejohn; Alexander Mimery; Jennifer H Martin; Ross Bailie; Gail Garvey; Euan T Walpole; Jon Adams; Daniel Williamson; Patricia C Valery Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2016-05-02 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Magdalena Esteva; Alfonso Leiva; María Ramos; Salvador Pita-Fernández; Luis González-Luján; Montse Casamitjana; María A Sánchez; Sonia Pértega-Díaz; Amador Ruiz; Paloma Gonzalez-Santamaría; María Martín-Rabadán; Ana M Costa-Alcaraz; Alejandro Espí; Francesc Macià; Josep M Segura; Sergio Lafita; Francisco Arnal-Monreal; Isabel Amengual; Marta M Boscá-Watts; Angels Hospital; Hermini Manzano; Rosa Magallón Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2013-02-23 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Bojoura Schouten; Bert Avau; Geertruida Trudy E Bekkering; Patrick Vankrunkelsven; Jeroen Mebis; Johan Hellings; Ann Van Hecke Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-03-26
Authors: Bojoura Schouten; Elke Van Hoof; Patrick Vankrunkelsven; Ward Schrooten; Paul Bulens; Frank Buntinx; Jeroen Mebis; Dominique Vandijck; Irina Cleemput; Johan Hellings Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Barbara M Wollersheim; Mies van Eenbergen; Kristel M van Asselt; Laurent M C L Fossion; Evert L Koldewijn; Jorg R Oddens; Eric H Oomens; Bart P Wijsman; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Nicole P M Ezendam Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2021-11-04 Impact factor: 2.497