Literature DB >> 22053489

The challenge of documenting water quality benefits of conservation practices: a review of USDA-ARS's conservation effects assessment project watershed studies.

M D Tomer1, M A Locke.   

Abstract

The Conservation Effects Assessment Project was established to quantify water quality benefits of conservation practices supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). In 2004, watershed assessment studies were begun in fourteen agricultural watersheds with varying cropping systems, landscapes, climate, and water quality concerns. This paper reviews USDA Agricultural Research Service 'Benchmark' watershed studies and the challenge of identifying water quality benefits in watersheds. Study goals included modeling and field research to assess practices, and evaluation of practice placement in watersheds. Not all goals were met within five years but important lessons were learned. While practices improved water quality, problems persisted in larger watersheds. This dissociation between practice-focused and watershed-scale assessments occurred because: (1) Conservation practices were not targeted at critical sources/pathways of contaminants; (2) Sediment in streams originated more from channel and bank erosion than from soil erosion; (3) Timing lags, historical legacies, and shifting climate combined to mask effects of practice implementation; and (4) Water quality management strategies addressed single contaminants with little regard for trade-offs among contaminants. These lessons could help improve conservation strategies and set water quality goals with realistic timelines. Continued research on agricultural water quality could better integrate modeling and monitoring capabilities, and address ecosystem services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22053489     DOI: 10.2166/wst.2011.555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Sci Technol        ISSN: 0273-1223            Impact factor:   1.915


  9 in total

1.  Reservoir Sedimentation and Upstream Sediment Sources: Perspectives and Future Research Needs on Streambank and Gully Erosion.

Authors:  G A Fox; A Sheshukov; R Cruse; R L Kolar; L Guertault; K R Gesch; R C Dutnell
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Long-term decreases in phosphorus and suspended solids, but not nitrogen, in six upper Mississippi River tributaries, 1991-2014.

Authors:  Rebecca M Kreiling; Jeffrey N Houser
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Identifying riparian buffer effects on stream nitrogen in southeastern coastal plain watersheds.

Authors:  Jay R Christensen; Maliha S Nash; Anne Neale
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Iowa Stream Nitrate, Discharge and Precipitation: 30-Year Perspective.

Authors:  Christopher S Jones; Keith E Schilling; Ian M Simpson; Calvin F Wolter
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Public-Private Partnerships Working Beyond Scale Challenges toward Water Quality Improvements from Private Lands.

Authors:  Stephanie K Enloe; Lisa A Schulte; John C Tyndall
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Factors Influencing Farmers' Adoption of Best Management Practices: A Review and Synthesis.

Authors:  Tingting Liu; Randall J F Bruins; Matthew T Heberling
Journal:  Sustainability       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Managing artificially drained low-gradient agricultural headwaters for enhanced ecosystem functions.

Authors:  Samuel C Pierce; Robert Kröger; Reza Pezeshki
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2012-12-10

8.  The Adoption of Bundled Sustainable Farm and Environmental Practices by Coffee Farmers in Southwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Gezahagn Kudama; Hika Wana; Mabiratu Dangia
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2021-12-08

9.  Context is Everything: Interacting Inputs and Landscape Characteristics Control Stream Nitrogen.

Authors:  Jana E Compton; Ryan A Hill; Alan T Herlihy; Robert D Sabo; J Renée Brooks; Marc Weber; Brian Pickard; Steve G Paulsen; John L Stoddard
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 11.357

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.