BACKGROUND/AIMS: To review the effectiveness of intra-arterial chemotherapy for advanced intra-ocular retinoblastoma with vitreous and/or subretinal seeds in naive (untreated) and previously treated eyes. METHODS: Retrospective study, approved by the institutional review board, of 76 eyes of 67 patients with retinoblastoma with subretinal and/or vitreous seeding treated with intra-arterial chemotherapy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between May 2006 and August 2010. RESULTS: Despite advanced intraocular disease with seeding, the majority (56/76) of eyes were saved; 20/76 eyes were enucleated. Among treatment-naive eyes, the 2-year probability of ocular salvage was 83% (95% CI 27% to 97%) for eyes with subretinal seeding only, 64% (95% CI 24% to 87%) for eyes with vitreous seeding only, and 80% (95% CI 40% to 95%) for eyes with both. Among eyes that received previous treatment and had progressed, the 2-year probability of ocular salvage was 50% (95% CI 15% to 78%) for eyes with only subretinal seeding, 76% (95% CI 48% to 91%) for eyes with vitreous seeding only, and 54% (95% CI 20% to 79%) for eyes with both. Nine of 29 naive eyes (31%) were cured with intra-arterial (super-selective ophthalmic artery infusion of chemotherapy) chemotherapy alone. CONCLUSION: Unlike radiation or systemic chemotherapy, intra-arterial chemotherapy can usually prevent the need for enucleation in naive eyes with advanced intraocular retinoblastoma with seeding-especially if the seeding is subretinal. Treatment appears to be less effective in previously treated eyes when subretinal seeding is present (50% at 2 years), but may be more effective in eyes that failed to respond to previous systemic chemotherapy and have only vitreous seeding.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To review the effectiveness of intra-arterial chemotherapy for advanced intra-ocular retinoblastoma with vitreous and/or subretinal seeds in naive (untreated) and previously treated eyes. METHODS: Retrospective study, approved by the institutional review board, of 76 eyes of 67 patients with retinoblastoma with subretinal and/or vitreous seeding treated with intra-arterial chemotherapy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between May 2006 and August 2010. RESULTS: Despite advanced intraocular disease with seeding, the majority (56/76) of eyes were saved; 20/76 eyes were enucleated. Among treatment-naive eyes, the 2-year probability of ocular salvage was 83% (95% CI 27% to 97%) for eyes with subretinal seeding only, 64% (95% CI 24% to 87%) for eyes with vitreous seeding only, and 80% (95% CI 40% to 95%) for eyes with both. Among eyes that received previous treatment and had progressed, the 2-year probability of ocular salvage was 50% (95% CI 15% to 78%) for eyes with only subretinal seeding, 76% (95% CI 48% to 91%) for eyes with vitreous seeding only, and 54% (95% CI 20% to 79%) for eyes with both. Nine of 29 naive eyes (31%) were cured with intra-arterial (super-selective ophthalmic artery infusion of chemotherapy) chemotherapy alone. CONCLUSION: Unlike radiation or systemic chemotherapy, intra-arterial chemotherapy can usually prevent the need for enucleation in naive eyes with advanced intraocular retinoblastoma with seeding-especially if the seeding is subretinal. Treatment appears to be less effective in previously treated eyes when subretinal seeding is present (50% at 2 years), but may be more effective in eyes that failed to respond to previous systemic chemotherapy and have only vitreous seeding.
Authors: Jasmine H Francis; Scott E Brodie; Brian Marr; Emily C Zabor; Ijah Mondesire-Crump; David H Abramson Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Christina Scelfo; Jasmine H Francis; Vikas Khetan; Thomas Jenkins; Brian Marr; David H Abramson; Carol L Shields; Jacob Pe'er; Francis Munier; Jesse Berry; J William Harbour; Andrey Yarovoy; Evandro Lucena; Timothy G Murray; Pooja Bhagia; Evelyn Paysse; Samuray Tuncer; Guillermo L Chantada; Annette C Moll; Tatiana Ushakova; David A Plager; Islamov Ziyovuddin; Carlos A Leal; Miguel A Materin; Xun-Da Ji; Jose W Cursino; Rodrigo Polania; Hayyam Kiratli; Charlotta All-Ericsson; Rejin Kebudi; Santosh G Honavar; Vicktoria Vishnevskia-Dai; Sidnel Epelman; Anthony B Daniels; Jeanie D Ling; Fousseyni Traore; Marco A Ramirez-Ortiz Journal: Int J Ophthalmol Date: 2017-06-18 Impact factor: 1.779
Authors: Nicolas Alessandro Yannuzzi; Jasmine H Francis; Brian P Marr; Irina Belinsky; Ira J Dunkel; Yves Pierre Gobin; David Harold Abramson Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Scott E Brodie; Francis L Munier; Jasmine H Francis; Brian Marr; Y Pierre Gobin; David H Abramson Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2012-11-11 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Jesse L Berry; Francis L Munier; Brenda L Gallie; Ashley Polski; Sona Shah; Carol L Shields; Dan S Gombos; Kathleen Ruchalski; Christina Stathopoulos; Rachana Shah; Rima Jubran; Jonathan W Kim; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya; Brian P Marr; Matthew W Wilson; Rachel C Brennan; Guillermo L Chantada; Murali M Chintagumpala; A Linn Murphree Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Helen Dimaras; Timothy W Corson; David Cobrinik; Abby White; Junyang Zhao; Francis L Munier; David H Abramson; Carol L Shields; Guillermo L Chantada; Festus Njuguna; Brenda L Gallie Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 52.329