OBJECTIVE: To compare the characteristics of female versus male gout patients and assess urate-lowering efficacy and safety of febuxostat or allopurinol treatment in women with gout. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 4,101 hyperuricemic (serum urate [sUA] level ≥8.0 mg/dl) gout subjects enrolled in 3 phase III comparative trials and randomized to receive placebo, febuxostat (40 mg, 80 mg, 120 mg, or 240 mg daily), or allopurinol (100 mg, 200 mg, or 300 mg daily, based on renal function). Baseline demographics and characteristics were summarized and compared between female and male subjects. Urate-lowering efficacy, which was defined as the proportion of subjects with sUA levels <6.0 mg/dl at final visit, was assessed for all subjects and, among women, according to baseline renal function. RESULTS:Female gout subjects (n = 226) were older with significantly higher rates of obesity and metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities than their male counterparts. The percentage of female subjects with sUA levels <6.0 mg/dl at final visit was 0% in the placebo group, 54.3%, 85.1%, 81.0%, and 100.0% in the febuxostat 40 mg, 80 mg, 120 mg, and 240 mg groups, respectively, and 45.9% in the allopurinol group. Similar patterns of urate-lowering efficacy rates were observed when stratified by renal function. Among all the female subjects, febuxostat 80 mg was significantly more efficacious than allopurinol (P < 0.001). Rates of adverse events (AEs) were low. The most frequently reported AEs were upper respiratory tract infections, musculoskeletal/connective tissue disorders, and diarrhea. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that febuxostat 80 mg may be more efficacious than commonly prescribed doses of allopurinol in female gout subjects with high rates of comorbidities.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the characteristics of female versus male goutpatients and assess urate-lowering efficacy and safety of febuxostat or allopurinol treatment in women with gout. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 4,101 hyperuricemic (serum urate [sUA] level ≥8.0 mg/dl) gout subjects enrolled in 3 phase III comparative trials and randomized to receive placebo, febuxostat (40 mg, 80 mg, 120 mg, or 240 mg daily), or allopurinol (100 mg, 200 mg, or 300 mg daily, based on renal function). Baseline demographics and characteristics were summarized and compared between female and male subjects. Urate-lowering efficacy, which was defined as the proportion of subjects with sUA levels <6.0 mg/dl at final visit, was assessed for all subjects and, among women, according to baseline renal function. RESULTS: Female gout subjects (n = 226) were older with significantly higher rates of obesity and metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities than their male counterparts. The percentage of female subjects with sUA levels <6.0 mg/dl at final visit was 0% in the placebo group, 54.3%, 85.1%, 81.0%, and 100.0% in the febuxostat 40 mg, 80 mg, 120 mg, and 240 mg groups, respectively, and 45.9% in the allopurinol group. Similar patterns of urate-lowering efficacy rates were observed when stratified by renal function. Among all the female subjects, febuxostat 80 mg was significantly more efficacious than allopurinol (P < 0.001). Rates of adverse events (AEs) were low. The most frequently reported AEs were upper respiratory tract infections, musculoskeletal/connective tissue disorders, and diarrhea. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that febuxostat 80 mg may be more efficacious than commonly prescribed doses of allopurinol in female gout subjects with high rates of comorbidities.
Authors: David M Maahs; Luiza Caramori; David Z I Cherney; Andrzej T Galecki; Chuanyun Gao; Diana Jalal; Bruce A Perkins; Rodica Pop-Busui; Peter Rossing; Michael Mauer; Alessandro Doria Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 4.810
Authors: Hamish Farquhar; Ana B Vargas-Santos; Huai Leng Pisaniello; Mark Fisher; Catherine Hill; Angelo L Gaffo; Lisa K Stamp Journal: Rheumatol Adv Pract Date: 2021-01-04
Authors: Federica Piani; Isabella Melena; Kalie L Tommerdahl; Natalie Nokoff; Robert G Nelson; Meda E Pavkov; Daniël H van Raalte; David Z Cherney; Richard J Johnson; Kristen J Nadeau; Petter Bjornstad Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2020-12-31 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Frouwke Veenstra; Sophie A C Wanten; Lise M Verhoef; Minke Ter Stal; Wing-Yee Kwok; Frank H J van den Hoogen; Marcel Flendrie; Noortje van Herwaarden Journal: Rheumatol Adv Pract Date: 2021-01-28
Authors: Theodora Szasz; Robert Patrick Davis; Hannah S Garver; Robert J Burnett; Gregory D Fink; Stephanie W Watts Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: V Thao-Vi Dao; Ana I Casas; Ghassan J Maghzal; Tamara Seredenina; Nina Kaludercic; Natalia Robledinos-Anton; Fabio Di Lisa; Roland Stocker; Pietro Ghezzi; Vincent Jaquet; Antonio Cuadrado; Harald H H W Schmidt Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 8.401