Literature DB >> 22052062

Nottingham trial of faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer: a 20-year follow-up.

J H Scholefield1, S M Moss, C M Mangham, D K Whynes, J D Hardcastle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Three large randomised trials have shown that screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) using the faecal occult blood test (FOBt) can reduce the mortality from this disease. The largest of these trials, conducted in Nottingham since 1981, randomised 152,850 individuals between the ages of 45 and 74 years to an intervention arm receiving biennial Haemoccult (FOB) test kit or to a control arm. In 2006, the National Bowel Cancer Screening Programme was launched in England using the FOBt, with the expectation that it will reduce CRC mortality. AIMS: To compare the CRC mortality and incidence in the intervention arm with the control arm after long-term follow-up.
METHODS: The 152,850 randomised individuals were followed up through local health records and central flagging (Office for National Statistics).
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 19.5 years there was a 13% reduction in CRC mortality (95% CI 3% to 22%) in the intervention arm despite an uptake at first invitation of approximately 57%. The CRC mortality reduction in those accepting the first screening test, adjusted for the rate of non-compliers, was 18%. There was no significant difference in mortality from causes other than CRC between the intervention and control arms. Despite removing 615 adenomas >10 mm in size from the intervention arm, there was no significant difference in CRC incidence between the two arms.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the reduction in CRC mortality was sustained, further follow-up of the screened population has not shown a significant reduction in the CRC incidence. Moreover, despite the removal of many large adenomas there was no reduction in the incidence of invasive cancer which was independent of sex and site of the tumour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22052062     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  80 in total

1.  Screening rates for colorectal cancer in Canada: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Charles N Bernstein; Jewel N Samadder; Rashid Ahmed
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

2.  Effect of a Single Aspirin Dose Prior to Fecal Immunochemical Testing on Test Sensitivity for Detecting Advanced Colorectal Neoplasms: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Silvia Calderazzo; Thomas Seufferlein; Leopold Ludwig; Nektarios Dikopoulos; Jörg Mangold; Wolfgang Böck; Thomas Stolz; Thomas Eisenbach; Thomas Block; Annette Kopp-Schneider; David Czock; Kaja Tikk
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Statistical analyses in Swedish randomised trials on mammography screening and in other randomised trials on cancer screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol; Michel Smans; Richard Sullivan; Peter Boyle
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Cancer Screening in the Elderly: A Review of Breast, Colorectal, Lung, and Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Ashwin A Kotwal; Mara A Schonberg
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 5.  Stool Based Testing for Colorectal Cancer: an Overview of Available Evidence.

Authors:  Kevin M Rank; Aasma Shaukat
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-08

6.  The necessity of colorectal cancer screening for elderly patients.

Authors:  Shin-Ei Kudo; Toyoki Kudo
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-03-23

7.  Survival and costs of colorectal cancer treatment and effects of changing treatment strategies: a model approach.

Authors:  Paal Joranger; Arild Nesbakken; Halfdan Sorbye; Geir Hoff; Arne Oshaug; Eline Aas
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2019-11-09

Review 8.  Stool Investigations for Colorectal Cancer Screening: From Occult Blood Test to DNA Analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Iannone; Giuseppe Losurdo; Maria Pricci; Bruna Girardi; Antonio Massaro; Mariabeatrice Principi; Michele Barone; Enzo Ierardi; Alfredo Di Leo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2016-06

9.  Assessing the effectiveness of a cancer screening test in the presence of another screening modality.

Authors:  Jessica Chubak; Rebecca A Hubbard; Eric Johnson; Aruna Kamineni; Carolyn M Rutter
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.136

10.  Favorable lifestyle before diagnosis associated with lower risk of screen-detected advanced colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Markus D Knudsen; Thomas de Lange; Edoardo Botteri; Dung-Hong Nguyen; Helge Evensen; Chloé B Steen; Geir Hoff; Tomm Bernklev; Anette Hjartåker; Paula Berstad
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.