PURPOSE: Exercise improves insulin resistance and is a first line for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. The extent, however, to which these responses are dose dependent is not known. The purpose of this study was to examine whether exercise dose was associated with improvements in insulin sensitivity after 4 months of exercise training in previously sedentary adults. METHODS: Fifty-five healthy volunteers participated in a 16-wk supervised endurance exercise intervention with a pre/postintervention design. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, peak oxygen uptake by a graded exercise test, and body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. The exercise intervention consisted of three to five sessions per week with a minimum of three sessions supervised. A ramped exercise prescription protocol was used to achieve 75% of peak HR for 45 min per session. Exercise dose, expressed as average kilocalories expended per week, was computed as the product of exercise intensity, duration and frequency. RESULTS: Improved insulin sensitivity was significantly related to exercise dose in a graded dose-response relationship. No evidence of threshold or maximal dose-response effect was observed. Age and gender did not influence this dose-response relationship. Exercise intensity was also significantly related to improvements in insulin sensitivity, whereas frequency was not. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies a graded dose-response relationship between exercise dose and improvements in insulin sensitivity. The implication of this observation is of importance for the adaptation of exercise prescription in clinical situations.
PURPOSE: Exercise improves insulin resistance and is a first line for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. The extent, however, to which these responses are dose dependent is not known. The purpose of this study was to examine whether exercise dose was associated with improvements in insulin sensitivity after 4 months of exercise training in previously sedentary adults. METHODS: Fifty-five healthy volunteers participated in a 16-wk supervised endurance exercise intervention with a pre/postintervention design. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, peak oxygen uptake by a graded exercise test, and body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. The exercise intervention consisted of three to five sessions per week with a minimum of three sessions supervised. A ramped exercise prescription protocol was used to achieve 75% of peak HR for 45 min per session. Exercise dose, expressed as average kilocalories expended per week, was computed as the product of exercise intensity, duration and frequency. RESULTS: Improved insulin sensitivity was significantly related to exercise dose in a graded dose-response relationship. No evidence of threshold or maximal dose-response effect was observed. Age and gender did not influence this dose-response relationship. Exercise intensity was also significantly related to improvements in insulin sensitivity, whereas frequency was not. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies a graded dose-response relationship between exercise dose and improvements in insulin sensitivity. The implication of this observation is of importance for the adaptation of exercise prescription in clinical situations.
Authors: F B Hu; R J Sigal; J W Rich-Edwards; G A Colditz; C G Solomon; W C Willett; F E Speizer; J E Manson Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-10-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Joseph A Houmard; Charles J Tanner; Cris A Slentz; Brian D Duscha; Jennifer S McCartney; William E Kraus Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2003-09-12
Authors: Kevin R Short; Janet L Vittone; Maureen L Bigelow; David N Proctor; Robert A Rizza; Jill M Coenen-Schimke; K Sreekumaran Nair Journal: Diabetes Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Ryan Pruchnic; Andreas Katsiaras; Jing He; David E Kelley; Carena Winters; Bret H Goodpaster Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-06-29 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Xuewen Wang; Bruce W Patterson; Gordon I Smith; Janine Kampelman; Dominic N Reeds; Shelby A Sullivan; Bettina Mittendorfer Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2013-03-14
Authors: Joyce S Ramos; Lance C Dalleck; Fabio Borrani; Alistair R Mallard; Bronwyn Clark; Shelley E Keating; Robert G Fassett; Jeff S Coombes Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Steven K Malin; Thomas P J Solomon; Alecia Blaszczak; Stephen Finnegan; Julianne Filion; John P Kirwan Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Kristian Karstoft; Kamilla Winding; Sine H Knudsen; Noemi G James; Maria M Scheel; Jesper Olesen; Jens J Holst; Bente K Pedersen; Thomas P J Solomon Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Fred K Tabung; Weike Wang; Teresa T Fung; Frank B Hu; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Jorge E Chavarro; Charles S Fuchs; Walter C Willett; Edward L Giovannucci Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2016-11-08 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Anne K Monroe; Todd T Brown; Christopher Cox; Sandra M Reynolds; Dorothy J Wiley; Frank J Palella; Lawrence A Kingsley; Michael W Plankey Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Nicole M Gilbertson; Andrew S Paisley; Sibylle Kranz; Arthur Weltman; Jennifer L Kirby; Peter T Hallowell; Steven K Malin Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 4.129