Literature DB >> 22051481

Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: a cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study.

Aynur Aras1, Emel Ada, Hatice Saracoğlu, Naciye S Gezer, Isil Aras.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the dentoskeletal changes and alterations of mandibular condyle-disc-fossa relationships in subjects at the peak and the end of the pubertal growth period treated with the Forsus fatigue resistant device (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif).
METHODS: The sample consisted of 29 subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusions who were classified according to their hand-wrist radiographs. Fifteen patients were at or just before the peak phase of pubertal growth (peak pubertal group). Fourteen patients were near the end of the pubertal growth period (late pubertal group). The study was conducted by using lateral cephalometric radiographs and magnetic resonance images obtained at the beginning and at the end of the application of the Forsus fatigue resistant device. The treatment period was 9 months.
RESULTS: The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to evaluate differences within groups. The changes observed in both groups were compared by using the Mann-Whitney U test. There were statistically significant group differences in mandibular length and ramus length, with significant increases of these parameters in the peak pubertal group (P <0.05). No significant differences were observed between the groups concerning dental parameters (P >0.05), with the exception of mandibular molar vertical movements, which were significantly greater in the peak pubertal group (P <0.05). Analysis of the magnetic resonance images showed no positional changes of the mandibular condyle in relation to the glenoid fossa in either group (P >0.05). Although the articular disc was positioned more anteriorly in the peak pubertal group compared with its pretreatment position (P <0.05), the position of the disc was still within the physiologic range. No significant intergroup difference was observed for disc-condyle relationship (P >0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The Forsus fatigue resistant device did not appear to cause significant increases in mandibular dimensions in subjects in late puberty. According to the magnetic resonance image findings, Forsus treatment is not a risk factor for the development of temporomandibular dysfunction in subjects with no signs and clinical symptoms of dysfunction.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22051481     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of the splint-supported Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in skeletal Class II growing subjects.

Authors:  Sherif A Elkordy; Ramy Abdeldayem; Mona M S Fayed; Ibrahim Negm; Dina El Ghoul; Amr M Abouelezz
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 2.  Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vasileios F Zymperdikas; Vasiliki Koretsi; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Moschos A Papadopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Changes in airway dimensions and hyoid bone position following class II correction with forsus fatigue resistant device.

Authors:  Nehir Canigur Bavbek; Burcu Balos Tuncer; Cagri Turkoz; Cagri Ulusoy; Cumhur Tuncer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Dentofacial Effects of Fixed Functional Appliances with or without Mini Screw Anchorage in the Treatment of Class II Division I Malocclusion: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Halil Akış; Cenk Doruk
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2018-03-01

5.  Evaluation of the effects of skeletal anchoraged Forsus FRD using miniplates inserted on mandibular symphysis: A new approach for the treatment of Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Tuba Unal; Mevlut Celikoglu; Celal Candirli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Treatment and posttreatment effects induced by the Forsus appliance: A controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Giorgio Cacciatore; Luis Tomas Huanca Ghislanzoni; Lisa Alvetro; Veronica Giuntini; Lorenzo Franchi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Upper airway changes after Xbow appliance therapy evaluated with cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Banu Erbas; Ilken Kocadereli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device used with miniscrew anchorage.

Authors:  Belma I Aslan; Ebru Kucukkaraca; Cagri Turkoz; Mufide Dincer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Three-dimensional assessment of the temporomandibular joint and mandibular dimensions after early correction of the maxillary arch form in patients with Class II division 1 or division 2 malocclusion.

Authors:  Hande Gorucu Coskuner; Semra Ciger
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Active-treatment effects of the Forsus fatigue resistant device during comprehensive Class II correction in growing patients.

Authors:  Giorgio Cacciatore; Lisa Alvetro; Efisio Defraia; Luis Tomas Huanc Ghislanzoni; Lorenzo Franchi
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.