Literature DB >> 22051427

Accuracy of blood pressure measurements reported in an electronic medical record during routine primary care visits.

Paul A Fishman1, Melissa L Anderson, Andrea J Cook, James D Ralston, Sheryl L Catz, Jim Carlson, Eric B Larson, Beverly B Green.   

Abstract

Electronic medical records (EMRs) allow for real-time access to blood pressure (BP) information on a population basis and improve identification and treatment of individuals with hypertension. Despite the potential uses of the data available from EMRs, relatively little research has examined the reliability of this data. To address this gap, the authors examined the reliability of BP taken at primary care visits and recorded in an EMR with those taken at a research study visit at which standard protocols were used to measure BP among all adults as well as by sex and age. Systolic BP (SBP) averaged 3.7 (17.3) points and diastolic BP (DBP) was 2.8 (10.6) points lower in the EMR than in the study visit across age and sex groups, with all differences statistically significant. For this cohort of patients with a diagnosis of hypertension, there was moderate correlation between BP measurements taken in clinic and at research. However, BP control for individuals, as defined by an SBP <140 mm Hg and DBP 90 mm Hg, differed by almost 25%. Known variability of BP and clinic procedures for measuring and recording BP may account for these differences.
© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22051427      PMCID: PMC3211104          DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00528.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  27 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of blood pressure in the office: recognizing the problem and proposing the solution.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Marshall Godwin; Martin Dawes; Alexander Kiss; Sheldon W Tobe; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Accuracy of blood pressure measurement in the family practice center.

Authors:  L E Kay
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  Home blood pressure measurement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Willem J Verberk; Abraham A Kroon; Alfons G H Kessels; Peter W de Leeuw
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Measuring blood pressure for decision making and quality reporting: where and how many measures?

Authors:  Benjamin J Powers; Maren K Olsen; Valerie A Smith; Robert F Woolson; Hayden B Bosworth; Eugene Z Oddone
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Blood pressure determination by traditionally trained personnel is less reliable and tends to underestimate the severity of moderate to severe hypertension.

Authors:  Weranuj Roubsanthisuk; Unticha Wongsurin; Surachai Saravich; Peera Buranakitjaroen
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.444

6.  How do minor changes in the definition of blood pressure control affect the reported success of hypertension treatment?

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Robert C Kaplan; Bruce M Psaty
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.

Authors:  John W Graves; Brandon R Grossardt; Rachel E Gullerud; Kent R Bailey; Jeffrey Feldstein
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 8.  Determining which automatic digital blood pressure device performs adequately: a systematic review.

Authors:  Y Wan; C Heneghan; R Stevens; R J McManus; A Ward; R Perera; M Thompson; L Tarassenko; D Mant
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 9.  Relative effectiveness of clinic and home blood pressure monitoring compared with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in diagnosis of hypertension: systematic review.

Authors:  J Hodgkinson; J Mant; U Martin; B Guo; F D R Hobbs; J J Deeks; C Heneghan; N Roberts; R J McManus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-06-24

10.  Relationship between blood pressure measurements recorded on patients' charts in family physicians' offices and subsequent 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Marshall Godwin; Dianne Delva; Rachelle Seguin; Ian Casson; Susan MacDonald; Richard Birtwhistle; Miu Lam
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2004-03-29       Impact factor: 2.298

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Blood Pressure Assessment in Adults in Clinical Practice and Clinic-Based Research: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Paula T Einhorn; William C Cushman; Paul K Whelton; Natalie A Bello; Paul E Drawz; Beverly B Green; Daniel W Jones; Stephen P Juraschek; Karen L Margolis; Edgar R Miller; Ann Marie Navar; Yechiam Ostchega; Michael K Rakotz; Bernard Rosner; Joseph E Schwartz; Daichi Shimbo; George S Stergiou; Raymond R Townsend; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright; Lawrence J Appel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Aliskiren, the first direct renin inhibitor: assessing a role in pediatric hypertension and kidney diseases.

Authors:  Shahid Nadeem; Donald L Batisky
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Blood pressure 1 year after completion of web-based pharmacist care.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Melissa L Anderson; James D Ralston; Sheryl L Catz; Andrea J Cook
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Disparities in Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Use in Nephrology Clinics.

Authors:  Manisha Jhamb; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Aihua Bian; Guanhua Chen; T Alp Ikizler; Mark L Unruh; Khaled Abdel-Kader
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Development and Validation of a Hypertension Prevalence Estimator Tool For Use in Clinical Settings.

Authors:  Matthew Ritchey; Keming Yuan; Cathleen Gillespie; Guangyu Zhang; Yechiam Ostchega
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Association of Controlled and Uncontrolled Hypertension With Workplace Productivity.

Authors:  Victoria Unmuessig; Paul A Fishman; Hubertus J M Vrijhoef; Arianne M J Elissen; David C Grossman
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Variant Discovery and Fine Mapping of Genetic Loci Associated with Blood Pressure Traits in Hispanics and African Americans.

Authors:  Nora Franceschini; Cara L Carty; Yingchang Lu; Ran Tao; Yun Ju Sung; Ani Manichaikul; Jeff Haessler; Myriam Fornage; Karen Schwander; Niha Zubair; Stephanie Bien; Lucia A Hindorff; Xiuqing Guo; Suzette J Bielinski; Georg Ehret; Joel D Kaufman; Stephen S Rich; Christopher S Carlson; Erwin P Bottinger; Kari E North; D C Rao; Aravinda Chakravarti; Paula Q Barrett; Ruth J F Loos; Steven Buyske; Charles Kooperberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Prevalence of Obesity and Elevated Blood Pressure in Adolescent Student Athletes From the State of Mississippi.

Authors:  Eric C Stiefel; Larry Field; William Replogle; Louis McIntyre; Oduche Igboechi; Felix H Savoie
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-02-19

9.  Cardiovascular risk profile in individuals initiating treatment for overactive bladder - Challenges and learnings for comparative analysis using linked claims and electronic medical record databases.

Authors:  E Vonesh; K L Gooch; V Khangulov; C R Schermer; K M Johnston; S M Szabo; J S Rumsfeld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The comparative effectiveness of hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone in an observational cohort of veterans.

Authors:  Brian C Lund; Michael E Ernst
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.738

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.