| Literature DB >> 22051046 |
Yusra A Al-Yafee1, Laila Y Al-Ayadhi, Samina H Haq, Afaf K El-Ansary.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Xenobiotics are neurotoxins that dramatically alter the health of the child. In addition, an inefficient detoxification system leads to oxidative stress, gut dysbiosis, and immune dysfunction. The consensus among physicians who treat autism with a biomedical approach is that those on the spectrum are burdened with oxidative stress and immune problems. In a trial to understand the role of detoxification in the etiology of autism, selected parameters related to sulfur-dependent detoxification mechanisms in plasma of autistic children from Saudi Arabia will be investigated compared to control subjects.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22051046 PMCID: PMC3217885 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-139
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
Mean ± S.D of all the measured parameters, percentage changes of autistic values relative to controls, and significant levels between both groups.
| Parameter | Group | N | Percentage change | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 20 | 8.28 ± 1.03 | 100.00 | 0.001 | |
| Autistic | 20 | 4.46 ± 0.33 | 53.85 | ||
| Control | 20 | 0.32 ± 0.06 | 100.00 | 0.001 | |
| Autistic | 20 | 0.54 ± 0.17 | 170.84 | ||
| Control | 20 | 26.07 ± 5.03 | 100.00 | 0.001 | |
| Autistic | 20 | 8.03 ± 2.46 | 30.79 | ||
| Control | 20 | 60.19 ± 15.42 | 100.00 | 0.052 | |
| Autistic | 20 | 70.25 ± 16.35 | 116.71 | ||
| Control | 20 | 0.73 ± 0.37 | 100.00 | 0.002 | |
| Autistic | 20 | 0.42 ± 0.18 | 57.48 | ||
| Control | 20 | 20.25 ± 5.99 | 100.00 | 0.001 | |
| Autistic | 20 | 40.75 ± 17.92 | 201.23 | ||
| Control | 20 | 24.30 ± 2.69 | 100.00 | 0.001 | |
| Autistic | 20 | 43.05 ± 5.86 | 177.16 | ||
| Control | 20 | 44.71 ± 7.43 | 100.00 | 0.001 | |
| Autistic | 20 | 74.70 ± 9.04 | 167.09 | ||
| Control | 20 | 1.83 ± 0.52 | 100.00 | 0.001 | |
| Autistic | 20 | 3.37 ± 1.22 | 184.15 | ||
Independent student's t-test between the control and autistic groups and percentage change in total glutathione level, oxidised glutathione (GSSG), GSH/GSSG, glutathione reductase, glutathione -S- transferase, peroxiredoxin 1, peroxiredoxin 3 level, thioredoxin 1, thioredoxin reductase (mU/ml).
Figure 1Normal distribution of the measured parameters in plasma of control and autistic patients.
Pearson correlation test showing correlation significance differences between the different measured parameters:
| Parameters | Pearson Correlation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| -0.536 | 0.000 | Nb | |
| -0.339 | 0.032 | Nb | |
| 0.502 | 0.001 | Pa | |
| -0.553 | 0.000 | Nb | |
| -0.861 | 0.000 | Nb | |
| -0.800 | 0.000 | Nb | |
| -0.550 | 0.000 | Nb | |
| 0.871 | 0.000 | Pa | |
| -0.436 | 0.005 | Nb | |
| 0.543 | 0.000 | Pa | |
| 0.602 | 0.000 | Pa | |
| 0.447 | 0.004 | Pa | |
| -0.801 | 0.000 | Nb | |
| 0.464 | 0.003 | Pa | |
| -0.364 | 0.021 | Nb | |
| -0.434 | 0.005 | Nb | |
| -0.494 | 0.001 | Nb | |
| 0.513 | 0.001 | Pa | |
| 0.519 | 0.001 | Pa | |
| 0.517 | 0.001 | Pa | |
| 0.446 | 0.004 | Pa | |
| -0.525 | 0.001 | Nb | |
| 0.873 | 0.000 | Pa | |
| 0.617 | 0.000 | Pa | |
| -0.803 | 0.000 | Nb | |
| 0.615 | 0.000 | Pa | |
| -0.779 | 0.000 | Nb | |
| -0.558 | 0.000 | Nb | |
Positive Correlation.
Negative Correlation.
Figure 2Pearson's correlations of the most significant positive and negative correlated variables listed in table 3.
Figure 3ROC Curve of the measured parameters showing, area under the curve (AUC), specificity and sensitivity.
ROC analysis of the measured parameters showing area under the curve,cutoff values, sensitivity and specificity.
| Parameter | Area under the curve | Cutoff value | Sensitivity % | Specificity % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.000 | 9.320 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 0.919 | 0.380 | 80.0% | 80.0% | |
| 1.000 | 31.100 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 0.650 | 75.620 | 30.0% | 90.0% | |
| 0.803 | 1.100 | 100.0% | 15.0% | |
| 0.915 | 26.240 | 90.0% | 80.0% | |
| 1.000 | 26.990 | 100.0% | 85.0% | |
| 0.993 | 52.140 | 100.0% | 85.0% | |
| 0.881 | 2.350 | 65.0% | 85.0% | |
Figure 4Proposed model of H2O2 removal in brain mitochondria[51] .