Literature DB >> 22050624

Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between the Tono-Pen XL® and Perkins® applanation tonometers in dogs and cats.

Silvia Franco Andrade1, Rodrigo Jesus Palozzi, Rogério Giuffrida, Renata Juliane de Campos, Gabriela de Campos Santos, Rosimery Missuzu Fukui.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy between two applanation tonometers, Tono-Pen XL(®) and Perkins(®), in ophthalmoscopically normal dogs and cats. ANIMALS: Both eyes of 25 conscious and healthy dogs and cats were evaluated. Both eyes of five dogs and cats immediately after sacrifice were used as controls for the postmortem study. PROCEDURE: In conscious animals, the tonometry was performed with topical anesthesia using 0.5% proxymetacaine eye drops for both tonometers and 1% fluorescein eye drops for the Perkins tonometer. Readings of intraocular pressure (IOP) in the postmortem study were taken using manometry and tonometry by Tono-Pen XL(®) and Perkins(®).
RESULTS: The correlation coefficient (r(2) ) in dogs between manometry and applanation tonometers Tono-Pen XL(®) and Perkins(®) were, respectively, 0.896 and 0.981 and in cats were 0.905 and 0.988. The mean IOP values in conscious dogs with Tono-Pen XL(®) and Perkins(®) were, respectively, 17.5 ± 3.7 mmHg (10.0-25.0 mmHg) and 15.3 ± 2.1 mmHg (12.0-19.8 mmHg) and in conscious cats were 16.8 ± 3.6 mmHg (10.5-24.5 mmHg) and 15.5 ± 1.3 mmHg (13.0-18.5 mmHg).
CONCLUSION: There was a strong correlation between the IOP values obtained by direct ocular manometry and the Tono-Pen XL(®) and Perkins(®) tonometers in dogs and cats. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean IOP obtained with both tonometers in conscious animals, there was, however, a difference between the minimum and mainly in the maximum values that were on average 5-6 mmHg higher with Tono-Pen XL(®) than those measured with Perkins(®), which justifies a table of normal values differentiated for each tonometer.
© 2012 American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22050624     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2011.00926.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1463-5216            Impact factor:   1.644


  6 in total

Review 1.  Functional Anatomy of the Outflow Facilities.

Authors:  Stefano Pizzirani; Haiyan Gong
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.093

2.  Biomechanical properties and correlation with collagen solubility profile in the posterior sclera of canine eyes with an ADAMTS10 mutation.

Authors:  Joel R Palko; Simone Iwabe; Xueliang Pan; Gunjan Agarwal; András M Komáromy; Jun Liu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Comparison of two rebound tonometers in healthy horses.

Authors:  Minna P Mustikka; Elina M Pietilä; Anna K Mykkänen; Thomas S C Grönthal
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 1.644

4.  Comparison among TonoVet, TonoVet Plus, Tono-Pen Avia Vet, and Kowa HA-2 portable tonometers for measuring intraocular pressure in dogs.

Authors:  João Victor Goulart Consoni Passareli; Felipe Franco Nascimento; Giovana José Garcia Estanho; Claudia Lizandra Ricci; Glaucia Prada Kanashiro; Rogério Giuffrida; Silvia Franco Andrade
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2021-09-21

5.  Intraocular pressure measurements using the TONOVET® rebound tonometer: Influence of the probe-cornea distance.

Authors:  Blanche D Rodrigues; Fabiano Montiani-Ferreira; Mariza Bortolini; André T Somma; András M Komáromy; Peterson Triches Dornbusch
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 1.644

6.  Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurement with Schiotz Tonometer and Tono-Pen Vet Tonometer in Healthy Dogs.

Authors:  Karolina Wrześniewska; Jacek Madany; Dagmara Winiarczyk
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 1.744

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.