Literature DB >> 22050527

Urologic applications of engineered tissue.

David M Kollhoff1, Earl Y Cheng, Arun K Sharma.   

Abstract

Many congenital and acquired anomalies affect the genitourinary tract, necessitating surgical intervention. Among these are bladder exstrophy, hypospadias, epispadias, posterior urethral valves, myelomeningocele, bladder carcinoma, urethral stricture disease, stress urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, vesicoureteral reflux and traumatic injuries of the urinary tract. Surgical repair of these conditions often utilizes skin, oral mucosa or bowel autograft or xenograft material to replace missing tissue or to augment inadequate tissues. These materials are often sufficient to restore the basic anatomy of the organ to which they are being grafted, but they usually do not completely restore normal function. In addition, postoperative complications are common, especially in the case of bladder augmentation or neobladder creation with autologous bowel. The complications and inherent limitations of these procedures may be mitigated by the availability of alternative tissue sources. Therefore, there has been a great deal of interest in developing tissues engineered from autologous materials, such as mature bladder cells, bone marrow-derived stem cells and adipose tissue. Ideally, an engineered tissue would restore or preserve the normal function of the organ it is augmenting or replacing. In addition, the engineered tissue should be nonimmunogenic to minimize rejection or foreign-body reactions. For the purposes of this article, we will focus on selection of scaffolding materials, selection of cell sources, and the current applications and potential future roles of tissue engineering in urology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22050527     DOI: 10.2217/rme.11.91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regen Med        ISSN: 1746-0751            Impact factor:   3.806


  6 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and future prospects for tissue engineering in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Bertha Chen; Bhumy Dave
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Bladder Augmentation Using Lyoplant®: First Experimental Results in Rats.

Authors:  F Winde; K Backhaus; J A Zeitler; N Schlegel; Th Meyer
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 3.  Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine -where do we stand?

Authors:  Raymund E Horch; Ulrich Kneser; Elias Polykandriotis; Volker J Schmidt; Jiaming Sun; Andreas Arkudas
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.310

4.  Transvaginal rectocele repair with human dermal allograft interposition and bilateral sacrospinous fixation with a minimum eight-year follow-up.

Authors:  Serge P Marinkovic; Scott Hughes; Donghua Xie; Lisa M Gillen; Christina M Marinkovic
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 5.  Bioengineering solutions for ureteric disorders: clinical need, challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kapetanos; Alexander Light; Niyukta Thakare; Krishnaa Mahbubani; Kasra Saeb-Parsy; Kourosh Saeb-Parsy
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 5.969

Review 6.  Concise Review: Tissue Engineering of Urinary Bladder; We Still Have a Long Way to Go?

Authors:  Jan Adamowicz; Marta Pokrywczynska; Shane Vontelin Van Breda; Tomasz Kloskowski; Tomasz Drewa
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 6.940

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.