Literature DB >> 22050505

Intermediate-term outcomes after renal cryoablation: results of a multi-institutional study.

Branden Duffey1, Vannhu Nguyen, Erik Lund, Joseph S Koopmeiners, John Hulbert, James Kyle Anderson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present intermediate-term oncologic efficacy of cryoablation (CA) for the treatment of patients with small renal masses in a multi-institution multisurgeon cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed billing records and tumor registries, identifying 116 renal tumors in 116 patients treated with CA by six surgeons at four institutions. Patient age, sex, tumor size, RENAL nephrometry score, complications, and recurrences were recorded.
RESULTS: One hundred-sixteen patients (66.4% male, 33.6% female) with 116 tumors underwent renal mass CA with a mean follow-up of 27.4 months (range 1-112 mos). Mean tumor size was 2.76 ± 0.97 cm (range 1.1-5.5 cm). Twenty-seven complications occurred in 23 patients for an overall complication rate of 19.8%. Low-grade complications (Clavien I and II) accounted for 92.6% (n=25) of overall complications. Seven (6%) patients had enhancement on initial imaging and were considered incomplete ablations. Local recurrence and metastatic disease developed in four and one patients, respectively. In patients with biopsy-proven renal-cell carcinoma (RCC), the 2- and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) probability was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74, 0.95) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.60, 0.94), respectively. After excluding biopsy proven RCC patients with incomplete ablations, the 2- and 5-year RFS increased to 0.91 (95% CI: 0.82, 1.00) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.00) respectively.
CONCLUSION: CA of renal masses results in acceptable oncologic efficacy accompanied by a tolerable complication profile in a cohort with a mean follow-up of 27.4 months. CA remains a viable treatment option for small renal masses in selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22050505     DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  5 in total

1.  Comparisons of percutaneous versus retroperitoneoscopic cryoablation for renal masses.

Authors:  Hui-Ying Liu; Shu-Huei Shen; Lin-Nei Hsu; Po-Hui Chiang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Thermal Ablation of Renal Tumors: Indications, Techniques and Results.

Authors:  Marc Regier; Felix Chun
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Mechanisms of cryoablation: clinical consequences on malignant tumors.

Authors:  J G Baust; A A Gage; T E Bjerklund Johansen; J M Baust
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 4.  Role of tumor location in selecting patients for percutaneous versus surgical cryoablation of renal masses.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Daniel J Canter; Marc C Smaldone; Tianyu Li; Jay Simhan; Boris Rozenfeld; Ervin Teper; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Rosalia Viterbo; Robert G Uzzo; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.344

5.  Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of renal cell carcinoma (RCC): experience in 200 tumours.

Authors:  Tze M Wah; Henry C Irving; Walter Gregory; Jon Cartledge; Adrian D Joyce; Peter J Selby
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 5.588

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.