Literature DB >> 22050504

Pediatric laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: technical considerations.

Jeffrey J Tomaszewski1, Daniel P Casella, Robert M Turner, Pasquale Casale, Michael C Ost.   

Abstract

Laparoscopy has become an effective modality for the treatment of many pediatric urologic conditions that need both extirpative and reconstructive techniques. Laparoscopic procedures for urologic diseases in children, such as pyeloplasty, orchiopexy, nephrectomy, and bladder augmentation, have proven to be safe and effective with outcomes comparable to those of open techniques. Given the steep learning curve and technical difficulty of laparoscopic surgery, robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RAS) is increasingly being adopted in pediatric patients worldwide. Anything that can be performed laparoscopically in adults can be extended into pediatric practice with minor technical refinements. We review the role of laparoscopic and RAS in pediatric urology and provide technical considerations necessary to perform minimally invasive surgery successfully.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22050504     DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  11 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance urography and laparoscopy in paediatric urology: a case series.

Authors:  Maria Beatrice Damasio; Sara Costanzo; Emilio Podestà; Gianmarco Ghiggeri; Giorgio Piaggio; Fabio Faranda; Maria Ludovica Degl'Innocenti; Vincenzo Jasonni; Gian Michele Magnano; Piero Buffa; Giovanni Montobbio; Girolamo Mattioli
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-07-31

Review 2.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic urological surgery in children.

Authors:  Luís F Sávio; Hiep T Nguyen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Upper Pole Heminephrectomy Versus Lower Pole Ureteroureterostomy for Ectopic Upper Pole Ureters.

Authors:  Jason E Michaud; Ardavan Akhavan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Robotic Ureteral Reimplant-the Current Role.

Authors:  Rajeev Chaudhry; Heidi A Stephany
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Patient positioning and port placement for robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Charles Chang; Zoe Steinberg; Anup Shah; Mohan S Gundeti
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 6.  Comparing the efficacy and safety between robotic-assisted versus open pyeloplasty in children: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shang-Jen Chang; Chun-Kai Hsu; Cheng-Hsing Hsieh; Stephen Shei-Dei Yang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Is outpatient robotic pyeloplasty feasible?

Authors:  Julia B Finkelstein; Jason P Van Batavia; Pasquale Casale
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-03-30

Review 8.  Laparoscopic vs open portoenterostomy in biliary atresia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David Eugenio Hinojosa-Gonzalez; Luis C Bueno; Andres Roblesgil-Medrano; Gustavo Salgado-Garza; Sofia Hurtado-Arellano; Juan S Farias; Mauricio Torres-Martinez; Jaime A Escarcega-Bordagaray; Marcelo Salan-Gomez; Eduardo Flores-Villalba
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Laparoendoscopic Single-Site (LESS) Surgery in Pediatric Urology: A 4-Year Experience.

Authors:  Mohamed Zouari; Mahdi Ben Dhaou; Saloua Ammar; Mohamed Jallouli; Riadh Mhiri
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-05-10

10.  Umbilical only access laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: Preliminary report.

Authors:  Rajendra B Nerli; Prasad V Magdum; Shridhar C Ghagane; Murigendra B Hiremath; Mallikarjuna Reddy
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.