Literature DB >> 22050452

The in vivo expression of radiation-induced chromosomal instability has an inflammatory mechanism.

Debayan Mukherjee1, Philip J Coates, Sally A Lorimore, Eric G Wright.   

Abstract

Ionizing radiation is unequivocally leukemogenic and carcinogenic, and this is generally attributed to DNA damage arising as a consequence of deposition of energy in the cell nucleus at the time of exposure. However, nontargeted effects, in which DNA damage is produced in nonirradiated cells as a consequence of cell signaling processes, indicate additional mechanisms. Radiation-induced chromosomal instability, a nontargeted effect with the potential to produce pathological consequences, is characterized by an increased rate of chromosome aberrations many generations after the initial insult. In this study, using a mouse model that has been well characterized with respect to its susceptibility to both radiation-induced chromosomal instability and acute myeloid leukemia, we investigated whether the underlying signaling mechanism was an inflammatory process by studying the effects of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Treated mice showed significant reduction in expression of the chromosomal instability phenotype 100 days postirradiation associated with reduced expression of inflammatory markers. The data support the hypothesis that the radiation-induced chromosomal instability phenotype is not an intrinsic property of the cells but a consequence of inflammatory processes having the potential to contribute secondary damage expressed as nontargeted and delayed radiation effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22050452     DOI: 10.1667/rr2793.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  11 in total

1.  Transmission of signals from rats receiving high doses of microbeam radiation to cage mates: an inter-mammal bystander effect.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Cristian Fernandez-Palomo; Jennifer Fazzari; Richard Smith; Elisabeth Schültke; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Jean Laissue; Christian Schroll; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  What mechanisms/processes underlie radiation-induced genomic instability?

Authors:  Andrei V Karotki; Keith Baverstock
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Pro-tumorigenic functions of macrophages at the primary, invasive and metastatic tumor site.

Authors:  Elaheh Nasrollahzadeh; Sepideh Razi; Mahsa Keshavarz-Fathi; Massimiliano Mazzone; Nima Rezaei
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 6.968

Review 4.  Radiation and inflammation.

Authors:  Dörthe Schaue; Ewa D Micewicz; Josephine A Ratikan; Michael W Xie; Genhong Cheng; William H McBride
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.934

5.  Radioprotective effect of mefenamic acid against radiation-induced genotoxicity in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  Seyed Jalal Hosseinimehr; Reyhaneh Nobakht; Arash Ghasemi; Tayyeb Allahverdi Pourfallah
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2015-09-30

6.  Dose and Radioadaptive Response Analysis of Micronucleus Induction in Mouse Bone Marrow.

Authors:  Laura A Bannister; Rebecca R Mantha; Yvonne Devantier; Eugenia S Petoukhov; Chantal L A Brideau; Mandy L Serran; Dmitry Y Klokov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Electromagnetic Fields, Genomic Instability and Cancer: A Systems Biological View.

Authors:  Jonne Naarala; Mikko Kolehmainen; Jukka Juutilainen
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Radioprotective Potential of Sulindac Sulfide to Prevent DNA Damage Due to Ionizing Radiation.

Authors:  Seyedeh Atekeh Torabizadeh; Mehdi Rezaeifar; Ali Jomehzadeh; Farzaneh Nabizadeh Haghighi; Mehdi Ansari
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 9.  The evolution of the cancer niche during multistage carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff; David Lyden; Timothy C Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 69.800

Review 10.  Adverse outcome pathways for ionizing radiation and breast cancer involve direct and indirect DNA damage, oxidative stress, inflammation, genomic instability, and interaction with hormonal regulation of the breast.

Authors:  Jessica S Helm; Ruthann A Rudel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.