Literature DB >> 22050108

Maximal accumulated oxygen deficit in running and cycling.

David W Hill1, Jakob L Vingren.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare values of maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD; a measure of anaerobic capacity) in running and cycling. Twenty-seven women and 25 men performed exhaustive treadmill and cycle ergometer tests of ∼3 min, ∼5 min, and ∼7 min duration. Oxygen demands were estimated assuming a linear relationship between demand and intensity and also using upwardly curvilinear relationships. When oxygen demand was estimated using speed (with exponent 1.05), values for MAOD for the three running tests were virtually identical; the mean of the three values was 78 ± 7 mL·kg⁻¹. Use of an oxygen demand that was estimated using work rate (with exponent 1.00) generated the most similar values for MAOD from the three cycling tests (mean of 59 ± 6 mL·kg⁻¹). Consistent with the higher (p < 0.05) MAOD in running, peak post-exercise blood lactate concentrations were also higher (p < 0.05) in running (13.9 ± 2.2 mmol·L⁻¹) than in cycling (12.6 ± 2.4 mmol·L⁻¹). The results suggest that the relationship between oxygen demand and running speed is upwardly curvilinear for the speeds used to measure MAOD; the relationship between demand and cycle ergometer work rate is linear; MAOD is greater in running than in cycling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22050108     DOI: 10.1139/h11-108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  8 in total

Review 1.  Training Considerations for Optimising Endurance Development: An Alternate Concurrent Training Perspective.

Authors:  Kenji Doma; Glen B Deakin; Mortiz Schumann; David J Bentley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Anaerobic Capacity in Running: The Effect of Computational Method.

Authors:  Erik P Andersson; Glenn Björklund; Kerry McGawley
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Validity of sports watches when estimating energy expenditure during running.

Authors:  Lilian Roos; Wolfgang Taube; Nadja Beeler; Thomas Wyss
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-12-20

4.  Anaerobic Capacityestimated in A Single Supramaximal Test in Cycling: Validity and Reliability Analysis.

Authors:  Willian Eiji Miyagi; Rodrigo de Araujo Bonetti de Poli; Marcelo Papoti; Romulo Bertuzzi; Alessandro Moura Zagatto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Anaerobic capacity estimated by the sum of both oxygen equivalents from the glycolytic and phosphagen pathways is dependent on exercise mode: Running versus cycling.

Authors:  Paulo Eduardo Redkva; Willian Eiji Miyagi; Fabio Milioni; Alessandro Moura Zagatto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Prediction of the Wingate anaerobic mechanical power outputs from a maximal incremental cardiopulmonary exercise stress test using machine-learning approach.

Authors:  Efrat Leopold; Dalya Navot-Mintzer; Eyal Shargal; Sharon Tsuk; Tamir Tuller; Mickey Scheinowitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Are Young Swimmers Short and Middle Distances Energy Cost Sex-Specific?

Authors:  Danilo A Massini; Tiago A F Almeida; Camila M T Vasconcelos; Anderson G Macedo; Mário A C Espada; Joana F Reis; Francisco J B Alves; Ricardo J P Fernandes; Dalton M Pessôa Filho
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Aerobic and Anaerobic Speed Predicts 800-m Running Performance in Young Recreational Runners.

Authors:  Øyvind Støren; Jan Helgerud; Jan-Michael Johansen; Lars-Erik Gjerløw; Aanund Aamlid; Eva Maria Støa
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.566

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.