BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The majority of small molecule compounds targeting chemokine receptors share a similar pharmacophore with a centrally located aliphatic positive charge and flanking aromatic moieties. Here we describe a novel piperidine-based compound with structural similarity to previously described CCR8-specific agonists, but containing a unique phenyl-tetrazol moiety which, in addition to activity at CCR8 was also active at CCR1. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Single point mutations were introduced in CCR1 and CCR8, and their effect on small molecule ligand-induced receptor activation was examined through inositol trisphosphate (IP(3) ) accumulation. The molecular interaction profile of the agonist was verified by molecular modeling. KEY RESULTS: The chemokine receptor conserved glutamic acid in TM-VII served as a common anchor for the positively charged amine in the piperidine ring. However, whereas the phenyl-tetrazol group interacted with TyrIV:24 (Tyr(172) ) and TyrIII:09 (Tyr(114) ) in the major binding pocket (delimited by TM-III to VII) of CCR8, it also interacted with TrpII:20 (Trp(90) ) and LysII:24 (Lys(94) ) in the minor counterpart (delimited TM-I to III, plus TM-VII) in CCR1. A straightening of TM-II by Ala-substitution of ProII:18 confirmed its unique role in CCR1. The extracellular loop 2 (ECL-2) contributed directly to the small molecule binding site in CCR1, whereas it contributed to efficacy, but not potency in CCR8. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Despite high ligand potency and efficacy and receptor similarity, this dual-active and bitopic compound binds oppositely in CCR1 and CCR8 with different roles of ECL-2, thereby expanding and diversifying the influence of extracellular receptor regions in drug action.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The majority of small molecule compounds targeting chemokine receptors share a similar pharmacophore with a centrally located aliphatic positive charge and flanking aromatic moieties. Here we describe a novel piperidine-based compound with structural similarity to previously described CCR8-specific agonists, but containing a unique phenyl-tetrazol moiety which, in addition to activity at CCR8 was also active at CCR1. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Single point mutations were introduced in CCR1 and CCR8, and their effect on small molecule ligand-induced receptor activation was examined through inositol trisphosphate (IP(3) ) accumulation. The molecular interaction profile of the agonist was verified by molecular modeling. KEY RESULTS: The chemokine receptor conserved glutamic acid in TM-VII served as a common anchor for the positively charged amine in the piperidine ring. However, whereas the phenyl-tetrazol group interacted with TyrIV:24 (Tyr(172) ) and TyrIII:09 (Tyr(114) ) in the major binding pocket (delimited by TM-III to VII) of CCR8, it also interacted with TrpII:20 (Trp(90) ) and LysII:24 (Lys(94) ) in the minor counterpart (delimited TM-I to III, plus TM-VII) in CCR1. A straightening of TM-II by Ala-substitution of ProII:18 confirmed its unique role in CCR1. The extracellular loop 2 (ECL-2) contributed directly to the small molecule binding site in CCR1, whereas it contributed to efficacy, but not potency in CCR8. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Despite high ligand potency and efficacy and receptor similarity, this dual-active and bitopic compound binds oppositely in CCR1 and CCR8 with different roles of ECL-2, thereby expanding and diversifying the influence of extracellular receptor regions in drug action.
Authors: M G Williams; H Shirai; J Shi; H G Nagendra; J Mueller; K Mizuguchi; R N Miguel; S C Lovell; C A Innis; C M Deane; L Chen; N Campillo; D F Burke; T L Blundell; P I de Bakker Journal: Proteins Date: 2001
Authors: Theo A Berkhout; Frank E Blaney; Angela M Bridges; David G Cooper; Ian T Forbes; Andrew D Gribble; Pieter H E Groot; Adam Hardy; Robert J Ife; Rejbinder Kaur; Kitty E Moores; Helen Shillito; Jennifer Willetts; Jason Witherington Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2003-09-11 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Christoph Seibert; Weiwen Ying; Svetlana Gavrilov; Fotini Tsamis; Shawn E Kuhmann; Anandan Palani; Jayaram R Tagat; John W Clader; Stuart W McCombie; Bahige M Baroudy; Steven O Smith; Tatjana Dragic; John P Moore; Thomas P Sakmar Journal: Virology Date: 2006-02-21 Impact factor: 3.616
Authors: Christopher A Haskell; Richard Horuk; Meina Liang; Mary Rosser; Laura Dunning; Imadul Islam; Leonor Kremer; Julio Gutiérrez; Gabriel Marquez; Carlos Martinez-A; Mark J Biscone; Robert W Doms; Sofia Ribeiro Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2005-10-12 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Laurie A Castonguay; Youmin Weng; William Adolfsen; Jerry Di Salvo; Ruth Kilburn; Charles G Caldwell; Bruce L Daugherty; Paul E Finke; Jeffrey J Hale; Christopher L Lynch; Sander G Mills; Malcolm MacCoss; Martin S Springer; Julie A DeMartino Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2003-02-18 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: J Hesselgesser; H P Ng; M Liang; W Zheng; K May; J G Bauman; S Monahan; I Islam; G P Wei; A Ghannam; D D Taub; M Rosser; R M Snider; M M Morrissey; H D Perez; R Horuk Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1998-06-19 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: P C Rummel; K N Arfelt; L Baumann; T J Jenkins; S Thiele; H R Lüttichau; A Johnsen; J Pease; S Ghosh; R Kolbeck; M M Rosenkilde Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Line Barington; Pia C Rummel; Michael Lückmann; Heidi Pihl; Olav Larsen; Viktorija Daugvilaite; Anders H Johnsen; Thomas M Frimurer; Stefanie Karlshøj; Mette M Rosenkilde Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 5.157