Literature DB >> 22049987

Some alternatives to asymptotic tests for the analysis of pharmacogenetic data using nonlinear mixed effects models.

Julie Bertrand1, Emmanuelle Comets, Marylore Chenel, France Mentré.   

Abstract

Nonlinear mixed effects models allow investigating individual differences in drug concentration profiles (pharmacokinetics) and responses. Pharmacogenetics focuses on the genetic component of this variability. Two tests often used to detect a gene effect on a pharmacokinetic parameter are (1) the Wald test, assessing whether estimates for the gene effect are significantly different from 0 and (2) the likelihood ratio test comparing models with and without the genetic effect. Because those asymptotic tests show inflated type I error on small sample size and/or with unevenly distributed genotypes, we develop two alternatives and evaluate them by means of a simulation study. First, we assess the performance of the permutation test using the Wald and the likelihood ratio statistics. Second, for the Wald test we propose the use of the F-distribution with four different values for the denominator degrees of freedom. We also explore the influence of the estimation algorithm using both the first-order conditional estimation with interaction linearization-based algorithm and the stochastic approximation expectation maximization algorithm. We apply these methods to the analysis of the pharmacogenetics of indinavir in HIV patients recruited in the COPHAR2-ANRS 111 trial. Results of the simulation study show that the permutation test seems appropriate but at the cost of an additional computational burden. One of the four F-distribution-based approaches provides a correct type I error estimate for the Wald test and should be further investigated.
© 2011, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22049987     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01665.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of Approaches to Deal with Low-Frequency Nuisance Covariates in Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses.

Authors:  Chakradhar V Lagishetty; Stephen B Duffull
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Approximate testing in two-stage nonlinear mixed models.

Authors:  J H Burton; J Volaufova
Journal:  J Stat Comput Simul       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.424

3.  Comparison of Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models and Noncompartmental Approaches in Detecting Pharmacogenetic Covariates.

Authors:  Adrien Tessier; Julie Bertrand; Marylore Chenel; Emmanuelle Comets
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Integrating dynamic mixed-effect modelling and penalized regression to explore genetic association with pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Julie Bertrand; Maria De Iorio; David J Balding
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Impact of model misspecification on model-based tests in PK studies with parallel design: real case and simulation studies.

Authors:  Mélanie Guhl; François Mercier; Carsten Hofmann; Satish Sharan; Mark Donnelly; Kairui Feng; Wanjie Sun; Guoying Sun; Stella Grosser; Liang Zhao; Lanyan Fang; France Mentré; Emmanuelle Comets; Julie Bertrand
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 2.410

6.  Clinical trial simulation to evaluate power to compare the antiviral effectiveness of two hepatitis C protease inhibitors using nonlinear mixed effect models: a viral kinetic approach.

Authors:  Cédric Laouénan; Jeremie Guedj; France Mentré
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Combined Analysis of Phase I and Phase II Data to Enhance the Power of Pharmacogenetic Tests.

Authors:  A Tessier; J Bertrand; M Chenel; E Comets
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2016-03-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.