Literature DB >> 2204922

The Hamilton Depression Scale and its alternatives: a comparison of their reliability and validity.

W Maier1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1990        PMID： 2204922     DOI： 10.1007/978-3-642-75373-2_8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacol Ser        ISSN： 0931-6795


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Sensitivity to changes during antidepressant treatment: a comparison of unidimensional subscales of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) in patients with mild major, minor or subsyndromal depression.

Authors:  Isabella Helmreich; Stefanie Wagner; Roland Mergl; Antje-Kathrin Allgaier; Martin Hautzinger; Verena Henkel; Ulrich Hegerl; André Tadić
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Methodological aspects in the assessment of severity of depression by the Hamilton Depression Scale.

Authors:  H J Möller
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  The Inventory Of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C(28)) is more sensitive to changes in depressive symptomatology than the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD(17)) in patients with mild major, minor or subsyndromal depression.

Authors:  Isabella Helmreich; Stefanie Wagner; Roland Mergl; Antje-Kathrin Allgaier; Martin Hautzinger; Verena Henkel; Ulrich Hegerl; André Tadić
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 5.270

4.  Protocol for the THREAD (THREshold for AntiDepressants) study: a randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of antidepressants plus supportive care, versus supportive care alone, for mild to moderate depression in UK general practice.

Authors:  Judy Chatwin; Tony Kendrick
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Psychometric evaluation of the Major Depression Inventory (MDI) as depression severity scale using the LEAD (Longitudinal Expert Assessment of All Data) as index of validity.

Authors:  Per Bech; N Timmerby; K Martiny; M Lunde; S Soendergaard
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.630
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.