Zhen Wang1, Zhi-Yong Dong, Jun-Qiang Chen, Jin-Lu Liu. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China. wangzhensurgeon@163.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The possible application and validity of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) concept in gastric cancer (GC) is still debated. A systematic review to evaluate the diagnostic value of SLN biopsy (SLNB) in GC is urgently needed. METHODS: A systematic review of relevant literatures was performed in PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library. A random-effect model was used to pool the data, and subgroup analysis was used to explain the heterogeneities. RESULTS: A total of 38 included studies (2,128 patients) were included. The pooled SLN identification rate, sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 93.7% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 91.1-95.6%), 76.9% (95% CI: 71.6-81.4%), 90.3% (95% CI: 86.9-92.9%), and 92.0% (95% CI: 89.9-93.7%), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that early T stage, combined tracers, submucosal injection method, conventional open surgery, and usage of immunohistochemistry were associated with higher SLN identification rate and sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB in GC is technically feasible with an acceptable sensitivity. However, further studies are needed to confirm the best procedure and standard criteria.
BACKGROUND: The possible application and validity of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) concept in gastric cancer (GC) is still debated. A systematic review to evaluate the diagnostic value of SLN biopsy (SLNB) in GC is urgently needed. METHODS: A systematic review of relevant literatures was performed in PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library. A random-effect model was used to pool the data, and subgroup analysis was used to explain the heterogeneities. RESULTS: A total of 38 included studies (2,128 patients) were included. The pooled SLN identification rate, sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 93.7% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 91.1-95.6%), 76.9% (95% CI: 71.6-81.4%), 90.3% (95% CI: 86.9-92.9%), and 92.0% (95% CI: 89.9-93.7%), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that early T stage, combined tracers, submucosal injection method, conventional open surgery, and usage of immunohistochemistry were associated with higher SLN identification rate and sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB in GC is technically feasible with an acceptable sensitivity. However, further studies are needed to confirm the best procedure and standard criteria.