BACKGROUND: In patients with primary hyperaldosteronism, adrenal vein sampling (AVS) has emerged as a gold standard for distinguishing between unilateral and bilateral disease, but multiple criteria have been used and no consensus exists as to the most accurate criterion. The objective of this study was to determine which AVS criteria most accurately identify patients with unilateral surgical disease and are associated with significant clinical improvement after adrenalectomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of AVS results in 108 patients with primary hyperaldosteronism treated at a single institution. Literature review of AVS criteria was used to distinguish between unilateral and bilateral disease. RESULTS: Of the 10 AVS criteria identified in the literature, one criterion (ACTH stimulation, positioning: cortisol [adrenal]/cortisol [periphery] [Ca/Cp] > 5.0 and lateralization: aldosterone/cortisol [A/C] [dominant {D}]: A/C [nondominant {ND}] > 4:1) was the most accurate in identifying and correctly predicting lateralization of disease (P value range: < 0.001-0.0369). For this criterion, the true positive rate was 88%. The second most accurate criterion was no ACTH stimulation, positioning Ca/Cp > 1.1 and lateralization: A/C (D): A/C (ND) > 2:1. For this criterion, the overall true positive was 85%. However, we found no significant difference in clinical outcome based on individual criteria fulfillment. CONCLUSIONS: Of the multiple criteria used for AVS evaluation, one criterion has the best accuracy. With the increasing use of AVS, there should be a consensus by which these results are evaluated and surgeons recommend adrenalectomy.
BACKGROUND: In patients with primary hyperaldosteronism, adrenal vein sampling (AVS) has emerged as a gold standard for distinguishing between unilateral and bilateral disease, but multiple criteria have been used and no consensus exists as to the most accurate criterion. The objective of this study was to determine which AVS criteria most accurately identify patients with unilateral surgical disease and are associated with significant clinical improvement after adrenalectomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of AVS results in 108 patients with primary hyperaldosteronism treated at a single institution. Literature review of AVS criteria was used to distinguish between unilateral and bilateral disease. RESULTS: Of the 10 AVS criteria identified in the literature, one criterion (ACTH stimulation, positioning: cortisol [adrenal]/cortisol [periphery] [Ca/Cp] > 5.0 and lateralization: aldosterone/cortisol [A/C] [dominant {D}]: A/C [nondominant {ND}] > 4:1) was the most accurate in identifying and correctly predicting lateralization of disease (P value range: < 0.001-0.0369). For this criterion, the true positive rate was 88%. The second most accurate criterion was no ACTH stimulation, positioning Ca/Cp > 1.1 and lateralization: A/C (D): A/C (ND) > 2:1. For this criterion, the overall true positive was 85%. However, we found no significant difference in clinical outcome based on individual criteria fulfillment. CONCLUSIONS: Of the multiple criteria used for AVS evaluation, one criterion has the best accuracy. With the increasing use of AVS, there should be a consensus by which these results are evaluated and surgeons recommend adrenalectomy.
Authors: Yah Yuen Tan; Jennifer B Ogilvie; Frederick Triponez; Nadine R Caron; Electron K Kebebew; Orlo H Clark; Quan-Yang Duh Journal: World J Surg Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: S B Magill; H Raff; J L Shaker; R C Brickner; T E Knechtges; M E Kehoe; J W Findling Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: G P Rossi; A Sacchetto; M Chiesura-Corona; R De Toni; M Gallina; G P Feltrin; A C Pessina Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: William F Young; Anthony W Stanson; Geoffrey B Thompson; Clive S Grant; David R Farley; Jon A van Heerden Journal: Surgery Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: J L Phillips; M M Walther; J C Pezzullo; W Rayford; P L Choyke; A A Berman; W M Linehan; J L Doppman; J R Gill Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: R J Auchus; F H Wians; M E Anderson; B L Dolmatch; C K Trimmer; S C Josephs; D Chan; S Toomay; F E Nwariaku Journal: Horm Metab Res Date: 2010-04-21 Impact factor: 2.936
Authors: Paolo Mulatero; Michael Stowasser; Keh-Chuan Loh; Carlos E Fardella; Richard D Gordon; Lorena Mosso; Celso E Gomez-Sanchez; Franco Veglio; William F Young Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Mihail Zilbermint; Paraskevi Xekouki; Fabio R Faucz; Annabel Berthon; Alexandra Gkourogianni; Marie Helene Schernthaner-Reiter; Maria Batsis; Ninet Sinaii; Martha M Quezado; Maria Merino; Aaron Hodes; Smita B Abraham; Rossella Libé; Guillaume Assié; Stéphanie Espiard; Ludivine Drougat; Bruno Ragazzon; Adam Davis; Samson Y Gebreab; Ryan Neff; Electron Kebebew; Jérôme Bertherat; Maya B Lodish; Constantine A Stratakis Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-03-30 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Naris Nilubol; Steven J Soldin; Dhaval Patel; Muthoni Rwenji; Jianghong Gu; Likhona S Masika; Richard Chang; Constantine A Stratakis; Electron Kebebew Journal: Int J Endocr Oncol Date: 2017-04-27
Authors: Tracy S Wang; Greg Kline; Tina W Yen; Ziyan Yin; Ying Liu; William Rilling; Benny So; James W Findling; Douglas B Evans; Janice L Pasieka Journal: World J Surg Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Taweesak Wannachalee; Lili Zhao; Kazutaka Nanba; Aya T Nanba; James J Shields; William E Rainey; Richard J Auchus; Adina F Turcu Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Marta Araujo-Castro; Miguel Paja Fano; Marga González Boillos; Begoña Pla Peris; Eider Pascual-Corrales; Ana María García Cano; Paola Parra Ramírez; Patricia Martín Rojas-Marcos; Jorge Gabriel Ruiz-Sanchez; Almudena Vicente Delgado; Emilia Gómez Hoyos; Rui Ferreira; Iñigo García Sanz; Mònica Recasens Sala; Rebeca Barahona San Millan; María José Picón César; Patricia Díaz Guardiola; Juan Jesús García González; Carolina M Perdomo; Laura Manjón Miguélez; Rogelio García Centeno; Juan Carlos Percovich; Ángel Rebollo Román; Paola Gracia Gimeno; Cristina Robles Lázaro; Manuel Morales-Ruiz; Felicia A Hanzu Journal: Endocrine Date: 2022-06-25 Impact factor: 3.925
Authors: Ammar Sarwar; Olga R Brook; Anand Vaidya; Ari C Sacks; Barry A Sacks; S Nahum Goldberg; Muneeb Ahmed; Salomao Faintuch Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 3.464