Literature DB >> 22048284

Recovery of psychomotor function after total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil-propofol or fentanyl-propofol.

Aki Takayama1, Shigeki Yamaguchi, Kazuyoshi Ishikawa, Mio Shinozaki, Yoshiyuki Kimura, Masaru Nagao, Toshimitsu Kitajima.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol combined with remifentanil or fentanyl has commonly been used to achieve general anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to examine recovery of psychomotor function, by use of the Trieger dot test, after TIVA with remifentanil-propofol or with fentanyl-propofol.
METHODS: Forty patients were randomly divided into two groups of 20, to receive TIVA with either remifentanil-propofol (group R) or fentanyl-propofol (group F). Anesthesia was induced by intravenous injection of propofol. In group R, remifentanil at 0.3 μg/kg/min was infused continuously during surgery. In group F, 3 μg/kg fentanyl was injected as an initial dose and 1 μg/kg fentanyl was administered intravenously every 30 min during surgery. Psychomotor function, as measured by the Trieger dot test, was evaluated before anesthesia and 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 min after the end of TIVA.
RESULTS: From assessment of the Trieger dot test, the number of dots missed in group R from 30 to 120 min after the end of TIVA was significantly lower than in group F. The maximum distance of dots missed in group R from 30 to 120 min after the end of TIVA was significantly shorter than in group F. The average distance of dots missed in group R from 30 to 120 min after the end of TIVA was significantly shorter than in group F.
CONCLUSION: Recovery of psychomotor function in TIVA with remifentanil-propofol is faster than that in TIVA with fentanyl-propofol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22048284     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-011-1266-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  24 in total

1.  EEG bispectral index monitoring in sevoflurane or propofol anaesthesia: analysis of direct costs and immediate recovery.

Authors:  A Yli-Hankala; A Vakkuri; P Annila; K Korttila
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.105

2.  Comparison of the time to extubation after use of remifentanil or sufentanil in combination with propofol as anesthesia in adults undergoing nonemergency intracranial surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.

Authors:  Marie-Christine Djian; Benoit Blanchet; Florence Pesce; Alain Sermet; Monique Disdet; Vincent Vazquez; Charles Gury; François-Xavier Roux; Jean-Loup Raggueneau; Joel Coste; Luc-Marie Joly
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.393

3.  Comparison of remifentanil with fentanyl for deep sedation in oral surgery.

Authors:  Gabriel F Lacombe; James L Leake; Cameron M L Clokie; Daniel A Haas
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Cost analysis of target-controlled infusion-based anesthesia compared with standard anesthesia regimens.

Authors:  S Suttner; J Boldt; C Schmidt; S Piper; B Kumle
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Assessment of recovery following day-case arthroscopy. A comparison between propofol and isoflurane-based anaesthesia.

Authors:  A Gupta; M Kullander; K Ekberg; C Lennmarken
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Recovery of psychomotor function after propofol sedation is prolonged in the elderly.

Authors:  Mio Shinozaki; Yosuke Usui; Shigeki Yamaguchi; Yasuhisa Okuda; Toshimitsu Kitajima
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Preoperative alprazolam reduces anxiety in ambulatory surgery patients: a comparison with oral midazolam.

Authors:  Jan L De Witte; Carmen Alegret; Daniel I Sessler; Guy Cammu
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Behavioral and physiological effects of remifentanil and alfentanil in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  M L Black; J L Hill; J P Zacny
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Remifentanil vs fentanyl with a target controlled propofol infusion in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial lesions.

Authors:  A Del Gaudio; P Ciritella; F Perrotta; M Puopolo; E Lauta; P Mastronardi; P De Vivo
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The interaction between fentanyl and propofol during emergence from anesthesia: monitoring with the EEG-Bispectral index.

Authors:  Weidong Mi; Tetsuhiro Sakai; Tsuyoshi Kudo; Mihoko Kudo; Akitomo Matsuki
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.452

View more
  6 in total

1.  The use of alfaxalone and remifentanil total intravenous anesthesia in a dog undergoing a craniectomy for tumor resection.

Authors:  Leon N Warne; Thierry Beths; Sandra Fogal; Sébastien H Bauquier
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Comparison of Recovery Profiles of Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy under Desflurane, Propofol, or Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Randomized, Prospective, Clinical, Comparative Study.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Verma; Rudrashish Haldar; Shashi Srivastava; Kuntal Kanti Das; Prabhaker Mishra
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2022-02-22

3.  Time course of psychomotor recovery after intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion as a part of balanced anaesthetic technique: A randomised, double-blind study.

Authors:  Sandeep Kumar Mishra; Ayyappan Chandrasekaran; Satyen Parida; Muthapillai Senthilnathan; Prasanna Udupi Bidkar; Suman Lata Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2019-08

4.  Comparison of Fentanyl, Remifentanil, Sufentanil and Alfentanil in Combination with Propofol for General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Kannan Sridharan; Gowri Sivaramakrishnan
Journal:  Curr Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019

5.  Factors that affect intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain following orthognathic surgery for mandibular prognathism.

Authors:  Yoshinori Aoki; Kaori Yoshida; Daisuke Nishizawa; Shinya Kasai; Tatsuya Ichinohe; Kazutaka Ikeda; Ken-ichi Fukuda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of Different Sedation Regimes on Cognitive Functions in Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Perihan Ekmekçi; Gulbanu Erkan; Hakan Yilmaz; Baturay K Kazbek; Ulku C Köksoy; Güler Doganay; Doganay Filiz Tüzüner
Journal:  Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol       Date:  2017-09-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.