Literature DB >> 22048163

Assembly of the transcription machinery: ordered and stable, random and dynamic, or both?

Timothy J Stasevich1, James G McNally.   

Abstract

The assembly of the transcription machinery is a key step in gene activation, but even basic details of this process remain unclear. Here we discuss the apparent discrepancy between the classic sequential assembly model based mostly on biochemistry and an emerging dynamic assembly model based mostly on fluorescence microscopy. The former model favors a stable transcription complex with subunits that cooperatively assemble in order, whereas the latter model favors an unstable complex with subunits that may assemble more randomly. To confront this apparent discrepancy, we review the merits and drawbacks of the different experimental approaches and list potential biasing factors that could be responsible for the different interpretations of assembly. We then discuss how these biases might be overcome in the future with improved experiments or new techniques. Finally, we discuss how kinetic models for assembly may help resolve the ordered and stable vs. random and dynamic assembly debate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22048163      PMCID: PMC7380716          DOI: 10.1007/s00412-011-0340-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  95 in total

1.  Disassembly of transcriptional regulatory complexes by molecular chaperones.

Authors:  Brian C Freeman; Keith R Yamamoto
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Quantitative high-throughput analysis of transcription factor binding specificities.

Authors:  Jane Linnell; Richard Mott; Simon Field; Dominic P Kwiatkowski; Jiannis Ragoussis; Irina A Udalova
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Mammalian cell-based optimization of the biarsenical-binding tetracysteine motif for improved fluorescence and affinity.

Authors:  Brent R Martin; Ben N G Giepmans; Stephen R Adams; Roger Y Tsien
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-09-11       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Proteolytic turnover of the Gal4 transcription factor is not required for function in vivo.

Authors:  Kip Nalley; Stephen Albert Johnston; Thomas Kodadek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Recycling of the general transcription factors during RNA polymerase II transcription.

Authors:  L Zawel; K P Kumar; D Reinberg
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Selective and accurate initiation of transcription at the Ad2 major late promotor in a soluble system dependent on purified RNA polymerase II and DNA.

Authors:  P A Weil; D S Luse; J Segall; R G Roeder
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Stepwise assembly of initiation proteins at budding yeast replication origins in vitro.

Authors:  T Seki; J F Diffley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Differentiation driven changes in the dynamic organization of Basal transcription initiation.

Authors:  Giuseppina Giglia-Mari; Arjan F Theil; Pierre-Olivier Mari; Sophie Mourgues; Julie Nonnekens; Lise O Andrieux; Jan de Wit; Catherine Miquel; Nils Wijgers; Alex Maas; Maria Fousteri; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Wim Vermeulen
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 9.  HSP90: the Rosetta stone for cellular protein dynamics?

Authors:  Diane C Dezwaan; Brian C Freeman
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Highly stable loading of Mcm proteins onto chromatin in living cells requires replication to unload.

Authors:  Marjorie A Kuipers; Timothy J Stasevich; Takayo Sasaki; Korey A Wilson; Kristin L Hazelwood; James G McNally; Michael W Davidson; David M Gilbert
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Transcription goes digital.

Authors:  Timothée Lionnet; Robert H Singer
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 2.  Pioneer factors and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors interact dynamically: A new perspective: Multiple transcription factors can effect chromatin pioneer functions through dynamic interactions with ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors.

Authors:  Erin E Swinstead; Ville Paakinaho; Diego M Presman; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  Quantifying transcription factor binding dynamics at the single-molecule level in live cells.

Authors:  Diego M Presman; David A Ball; Ville Paakinaho; Jonathan B Grimm; Luke D Lavis; Tatiana S Karpova; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  Reconciling the concurrent fast and slow cycling of proteins on gene promoters.

Authors:  Yaolai Wang; Feng Liu; Jun Li; Wei Wang
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Cellular response to heat shock studied by multiconfocal fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.

Authors:  Meike Kloster-Landsberg; Gaëtan Herbomel; Irène Wang; Jacques Derouard; Claire Vourc'h; Yves Usson; Catherine Souchier; Antoine Delon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Dynamic regulation of transcriptional states by chromatin and transcription factors.

Authors:  Ty C Voss; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 7.  Chromatin reprogramming in breast cancer.

Authors:  Erin E Swinstead; Ville Paakinaho; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 8.  The nuclear receptor superfamily: A structural perspective.

Authors:  Emily R Weikum; Xu Liu; Eric A Ortlund
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Dynamics of the ternary complex formed by c-Myc interactor JPO2, transcriptional co-activator LEDGF/p75, and chromatin.

Authors:  Jelle Hendrix; Bart van Heertum; Els Vanstreels; Dirk Daelemans; Jan De Rijck
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 5.486

10.  Protein complex formation: computational clarification of the sequential versus probabilistic recruitment puzzle.

Authors:  Manuel Schölling; Stefan Thurner; Rudolf Hanel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.