Literature DB >> 22048106

Arthroscopic basic task performance in shoulder simulator model correlates with similar task performance in cadavers.

Kevin D Martin1, Philip J Belmont, Andrew J Schoenfeld, Michael Todd, Kenneth L Cameron, Brett D Owens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Attainment of the technical skill necessary to safely perform arthroscopic procedures requires the instruction of orthopaedic surgery residents in basic arthroscopic skills. Although previous studies involving shoulder arthroscopy simulators have demonstrated a correlation between task performance and the level of prior arthroscopic experience, data demonstrating the correlation of simulator performance with arthroscopic skill in a surgical setting are scarce. Our goal was to evaluate the correlation between timed task performance in an arthroscopic shoulder simulator and timed task performance in a cadaveric shoulder arthroscopy model.
METHODS: Subjects were recruited from among residents and attending surgeons in an orthopaedic surgery residency program. Each subject was tested on an arthroscopic shoulder simulator and objectively scored on the basis of the time taken to complete a standardized object selection program. After an interval of at least two weeks, each subject was then tested on a cadaveric shoulder arthroscopy model designed to replicate the shoulder arthroscopy simulator testing protocol, and the time to completion was again recorded. Both testing protocols involved the simple task of placing a probe on a series of assigned locations in the glenohumeral joint. Spearman rank correlation analysis was performed, and regression analysis was used to determine the predictive ability of the simulator score.
RESULTS: The performance time on the simulation program was strongly correlated with the performance time on the cadaveric model (r = 0.736, p < 0.001). The time required to complete the simulator task was a significant predictor of the time required to complete the cadaveric task (t = 4.48, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated a strong correlation between performance of basic arthroscopic tasks in a simulator model and performance of the same tasks in a cadaveric model.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22048106     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  23 in total

1.  Global Rating Scales and Motion Analysis Are Valid Proficiency Metrics in Virtual and Benchtop Knee Arthroscopy Simulators.

Authors:  Justues Chang; Daniel C Banaszek; Jason Gambrel; Davide Bardana
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Education in wrist arthroscopy: past, present and future.

Authors:  M C Obdeijn; N Bavinck; C Mathoulin; C M A M van der Horst; M P Schijven; G J M Tuijthof
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  A Biomechanical Comparison of Varying Base Knot Configurations with Different Overhand/Underhand Combinations of Reversing Half-Hitches on Alternating Posts After Basic Instructional Training.

Authors:  Heather A Evin; Tyler T Bilden; Benjamin C Noonan; Alexander Cm Chong
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

4.  [Further training in the faculty of orthopedics and trauma surgery. Outstanding, average or insufficient?].

Authors:  M Perl; R Stange; M Niethard; M Münzberg
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  The role of simulation in developing surgical skills.

Authors:  K S N Akhtar; Alvin Chen; N J Standfield; C M Gupte
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-06

6.  Comparison of Three Virtual Reality Arthroscopic Simulators as Part of an Orthopedic Residency Educational Curriculum.

Authors:  Kevin D Martin; Craig C Akoh; Annunziato Amendola; Phinit Phisitkul
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2016

7.  Touch Surgery: Analysis and Assessment of Validity of a Hand Surgery Simulation "App".

Authors:  Jacob Tulipan; Andrew Miller; Andrew G Park; Joseph T Labrum; Asif M Ilyas
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-01-24

8.  Simulation in shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Henry B Colaço; Duncan Tennent
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-09-09

9.  Assessing Performance in Shoulder Arthroscopy: The Imperial Global Arthroscopy Rating Scale (IGARS).

Authors:  Sofia Bayona; Kash Akhtar; Chinmay Gupte; Roger J H Emery; Alexander L Dodds; Fernando Bello
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Shoulder arthroscopy simulator training improves shoulder arthroscopy performance in a cadaveric model.

Authors:  R Frank Henn; Neel Shah; Jon J P Warner; Andreas H Gomoll
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 4.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.