Literature DB >> 22048067

The pearls and pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging for the spine.

James M Elliott1, Timothy W Flynn, Aiman Al-Najjar, Joel Press, Bao Nguyen, J Timothy Noteboom.   

Abstract

Musculoskeletal imaging of the spine can be an invaluable tool to inform clinical decision making in patients with spinal pain. An understanding of the technology involved in producing and interpreting high-resolution images produced from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the human spine is necessary to better appreciate which sequences can be used for, or tailored to, individual patients and their conditions. However, there is substantial variability in the clinical meaningfulness of some MRI findings of spinal tissues. For example, normal variants can often mimic significant musculoskeletal pathology, which could increase the risk of misinformed clinical decisions and, even worse, poor or adverse outcomes. This clinical commentary will highlight some of the pearls and pitfalls of MRI for the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions, and include cases to illustrate some of the common imaging artifacts and normal variants for MRI of the spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22048067     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  6 in total

Review 1.  Advancing imaging technologies for patients with spinal pain: with a focus on whiplash injury.

Authors:  James M Elliott; Mark J Hancock; Rebecca J Crawford; Andrew C Smith; David M Walton
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Differential diagnosis of a patient referred to physical therapy with neck pain: a case study of a patient with an atypical presentation of angina.

Authors:  Jessie J Mathers
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-11

3.  Age- and Level-Dependence of Fatty Infiltration in Lumbar Paravertebral Muscles of Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  R J Crawford; L Filli; J M Elliott; D Nanz; M A Fischer; M Marcon; E J Ulbrich
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Rate of lumbar paravertebral muscle fat infiltration versus spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations: an age-aggregated cross-sectional simulation study.

Authors:  Rebecca J Crawford; Thomas Volken; Stephanie Valentin; Markus Melloh; James M Elliott
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2016-08-05

5.  Predictive value of pedicle involvement with MRI in spine metastases.

Authors:  Wang Mi Liu; Rong Xing; Chong Bian; Yun Liang; Libo Jiang; Chen Qian; Jian Dong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-09-20

6.  Categorisation of lumbar spine MRI referrals in Denmark as compliant or non-compliant to international imaging guidelines: an inter-rater reliability study.

Authors:  Susanne Brogaard Krogh; Tue Secher Jensen; Nanna Rolving; Malene Laursen; Janus Nikolaj Laust Thomsen; Casper Brink Hansen; Christoffer Høj Werenberg; Erik Rasmussen; Rune Carlson; Rikke Krüger Jensen
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2021-03-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.