Literature DB >> 22046972

Identifying and explicating variation among friends with benefits relationships.

Paul A Mongeau1, Kendra Knight, Jade Williams, Jennifer Eden, Christina Shaw.   

Abstract

This two-study report identifies and validates a typology containing seven types of "friends with benefits relationships" (FWBRs). Study 1 asked heterosexual students to define the term FWBR and to describe their experience with the relationship type. Qualitative analysis of these data identified seven types of FWBRs (true friends, network opportunism, just sex, three types of transition in [successful, failed, and unintentional], and transition out). Study 2 quantitatively differentiates these relationship types in the amount of nonsexual interaction, strength of the friendship at the first sexual interaction, and history of romantic relationships with the FWBR partner (before the FWBR, after it, or both). Results from both studies clearly suggest that FWBRs represent a diverse set of relationship formulations where both the benefits (i.e., repeated sexual contact) and the friends (i.e., relationship between partners) vary widely. In many cases, FWBRs represent a desire for, or an attempt at, shifting the relationship from friends to a romantic partnership. Other implications are discussed, as are limitations and directions for future research. The diverse nature of FWBRs provides challenges for researchers that likely require multiple methods and theoretical frames.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22046972     DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2011.623797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Res        ISSN: 0022-4499


  9 in total

1.  Predictors of sexual hookups: a theory-based, prospective study of first-year college women.

Authors:  Robyn L Fielder; Jennifer L Walsh; Kate B Carey; Michael P Carey
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2013-05-09

2.  Friends with benefits: dating practices of rural high school and college students.

Authors:  Amber Letcher; Jasmin Carmona
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-06

3.  Evaluations and Future Plans After Casual Sexual Experiences: Differences Across Partner Type.

Authors:  Rose Wesche; Shannon E Claxton; Eva S Lefkowitz; Manfred H M van Dulmen
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2017-03-24

4.  Are the Developmental Features of Emerging Adulthood Associated with Willingness to Engage in Consensually Nonmonogamous Relationships?

Authors:  Spencer B Olmstead; Kristin M Anders
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-02-25

5.  Examining Rules in Friends with Benefits Relationships.

Authors:  Lisa J van Raalte; Lori A Bednarchik; Mark A Generous; Paul A Mongeau
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-11-15

Review 6.  Sexuality (and Lack Thereof) in Adolescence and Early Adulthood: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Marie-Aude Boislard; Daphne van de Bongardt; Martin Blais
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-17

7.  Casual Sexual Scripts on the Screen: A Quantitative Content Analysis.

Authors:  Elisabeth Timmermans; Jan Van den Bulck
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2018-03-27

8.  Clear-Cut Terms and Culture-Sensitive Characteristics of Distinctive Casual Sexual Relationships in Portuguese Emerging Adults.

Authors:  Maria-João Alvarez; Cícero R Pereira; Cristina A Godinho; Rita Luz
Journal:  Sex Cult       Date:  2021-04-10

9.  Sex and Relationships Pre- and Early- COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings from a Probability Sample of U.S. Undergraduate Students.

Authors:  Debby Herbenick; Devon J Hensel; Heather Eastman-Mueller; Jonathon Beckmeyer; Tsung-Chieh Fu; Lucia Guerra-Reyes; Molly Rosenberg
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-01-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.