Literature DB >> 22046961

Efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol via a dry powder inhaler in Chinese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Nanshan Zhong1, Jinping Zheng, Fuqiang Wen, Lan Yang, Ping Chen, Qingyu Xiu, Wanzhen Yao, Tieying Sun, Ziwen Zhao, Huahao Shen, Yi Shi, Jiangtao Lin, Qiang Li.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of budesonide (BUD)/formoterol (FORM) compared with BUD, both administered by way of a dry powder inhaler (Turbuhaler * ). * Turbuhaler is a registered trade name of AstraZeneca, Södertälje, Sweden.
METHODS: This was a 6-month, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, double-dummy design study (NCT 00421122). Patients were randomized to either BUD/FORM 160/4.5 μg, two inhalations twice daily, or BUD 200 μg, two inhalations twice daily. Improvement of lung function, daily symptoms, reliever use and health-related quality-of-life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] score) were compared between the two treatment groups.
RESULTS: A total of 308 patients with moderate to very severe COPD from 12 centers in China were randomized to BUD/FORM (n = 156) or BUD (n = 152). The primary endpoint, 1-hour post-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), in the BUD/FORM group improved by 0.18 L (from 0.83 L at baseline to 1.01 L) and this was significantly better (p < 0.001) than the small increase (0.03 L) observed in the BUD group after 24 weeks' treatment. Increases in pre-dose and 15-min post-dose FEV(1) together with 1-hour post-dose forced vital capacity were also significantly larger with BUD/FORM than BUD (p < 0.001 for all). Compared with BUD alone, BUD/FORM improved COPD total symptom scores (-1.04 ± 0.16 vs. -0.55 ± 0.17; p = 0.03), reduced reliever use (-0.85 ± 0.16 puffs/day vs. -0.31 ± 0.16 puffs/day; p = 0.012) and improved health-related quality-of-life (mean change of total SGRQ score -4.5 points (p = 0.0182). Overall, both treatments were well tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS: In Chinese patients with moderate to very severe COPD, fixed combination treatment with BUD/FORM resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in lung function, health-related quality-of-life, COPD symptoms and a reduction in reliever use, compared with BUD alone and both treatments were well tolerated. Treatment of BUD/FORM for milder patients with COPD and head to head comparison of Chinese and Caucasians in future studies will be helpful to expand upon the findings of the current clinical trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22046961     DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2011.636420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  10 in total

1.  Bronchodilator Efficacy of a Single-Dose 12/400-µg Formoterol/Budesonide Combination as a Dry Powder for Inhalation Delivered by Discair® in Adult Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Stable COPD: Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase IV Trial.

Authors:  Pinar Yildiz; Mesut Bayraktaroglu; Didem Gorgun; Kivanc Yuksel
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Combined corticosteroid and long-acting beta₂-agonist in one inhaler versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Luis Javier Nannini; Phillippa Poole; Stephen J Milan; Rebecca Holmes; Rebecca Normansell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-11-10

Review 3.  Combined corticosteroid and long-acting beta(2)-agonist in one inhaler versus inhaled corticosteroids alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Luis Javier Nannini; Phillippa Poole; Stephen J Milan; Annabel Kesterton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-08-30

4.  Long-term treatment with budesonide/formoterol attenuates circulating CRP levels in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients of group D.

Authors:  Yi-Hua Lin; Xi-Ning Liao; Li-Li Fan; Yue-Jin Qu; De-Yun Cheng; Yong-Hong Shi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Risks of budesonide/formoterol for the treatment of stable COPD: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bin Tang; Jun Wang; Lin-Lin Luo; Qiu-Gen Li; Dan Huang
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2019-04-01

6.  Protocol for a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of the clinical benefit of inhaled maintenance therapies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Adam Lewis; Eleanor L Axson; James Potts; Renelle Tarnowska; Helene Vioix; Jennifer K Quint
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Potential negative consequences of non-consented switch of inhaled medications and devices in asthma patients.

Authors:  U S Björnsdóttir; S Gizurarson; U Sabale
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Comparative efficacy of inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta agonist combinations in preventing COPD exacerbations: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuji Oba; Nazir A Lone
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2014-05-12

9.  Mortality and drug therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Scott; Bethan Woods; Juliette C Thompson; James F Clark; Neil Hawkins; Mike Chambers; Bartolome R Celli; Peter Calverley
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.317

10.  Budesonide/formoterol MDI with co-suspension delivery technology in COPD: the TELOS study.

Authors:  Gary T Ferguson; Alberto Papi; Antonio Anzueto; Edward M Kerwin; Christy Cappelletti; Elizabeth A Duncan; Jack Nyberg; Paul Dorinsky
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2018-09-16       Impact factor: 16.671

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.