| Literature DB >> 22046473 |
Abstract
Human inborn numerical competence means our ability to recognize object numbers precisely under circumstances which do not allow sequential counting. This archaic process has been called "subitizing," from the Latin "subito" = suddenly, immediately, indicating that the objects in question are presented to test persons only for a fraction of a second in order to prevent counting. In contrast, however, sequential counting, an outstanding cultural achievement of mankind, means to count "1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8…" without a limit. The following essay will explain how the limit of numerical competence, i.e., the recognition of object numbers without counting, has been determined for humans and how this has been achieved for the first time in case of an invertebrate, the honeybee. Finally, a hypothesis explaining the influence of our limited, inborn numerical competence on counting in our times, e.g., in the Russian language, will be presented. Subitizing versus counting by young Down syndrome infants and autistics and the Savant syndrome will be discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Aristotle; Cicero; Down syndrome; autism; honeybee hieroglyphs; magical number four; numerical competence; savant syndrome; sequential counting; subitizing
Year: 2011 PMID: 22046473 PMCID: PMC3204139 DOI: 10.4161/cib.4.5.16677
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Commun Integr Biol ISSN: 1942-0889