Literature DB >> 22046026

Integrating pain metrics into oncology clinical trials.

Charles S Cleeland1, Ann O'Mara, Martin Zagari, Carole Baas.   

Abstract

Cancer-related pain is highly prevalent and often severe, and as a result is often one of the defining experiences for patients with malignancy. Patients and patients' families almost always live with the ever-present reality that cancer treatment and progression may be accompanied by pain. For patients nearing the end of life, most fear that their final days will be spent living with the terrible effects of the disease, the most important of which is pain. Despite this, there is far less systematic research on the mechanisms of cancer-related pain or on the development of new agents to reduce or eliminate pain in cancer patients compared with research to combat the disease itself. Further, even when the focus of research is treatment of the tumor, the effects of anticancer treatments on pain are often underreported in publications and other forums. To illustrate the relative drought in the cancer pain control area, there have been no new drugs approved for cancer-related pain in recent years. A number of methodologic and logistical challenges that hinder the ability to assess pain response in clinical trials are discussed in this article. Possible ways to address these challenges are also discussed. ©2011 AACR

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22046026     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  8 in total

Review 1.  Translational approaches to treatment-induced symptoms in cancer patients.

Authors:  Robert Dantzer; Mary W Meagher; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Targeting putative mu opioid/metabotropic glutamate receptor-5 heteromers produces potent antinociception in a chronic murine bone cancer model.

Authors:  Branden A Smeester; Mary M Lunzer; Eyup Akgün; Alvin J Beitz; Philip S Portoghese
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.432

3.  CORR Insights®: Early Improvement in Pain and Functional Outcome but Not Quality of Life After Surgery for Metastatic Long Bone Disease.

Authors:  Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Adaptive clinical trial designs for simultaneous testing of matched diagnostics and therapeutics.

Authors:  Howard I Scher; Shelley Fuld Nasso; Eric H Rubin; Richard Simon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Patient-reported outcomes of pain and physical functioning in neurofibromatosis clinical trials.

Authors:  Pamela L Wolters; Staci Martin; Vanessa L Merker; James H Tonsgard; Sondra E Solomon; Andrea Baldwin; Amanda L Bergner; Karin Walsh; Heather L Thompson; Kathy L Gardner; Cynthia M Hingtgen; Elizabeth Schorry; William N Dudley; Barbara Franklin
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Pain questionnaire performance in advanced prostate cancer: comparative results from two international clinical trials.

Authors:  Donald W Robinson; Ning Zhao; Fitzroy Dawkins; Ming Qi; Dennis Revicki
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  An exploration of differences between Japan and two European countries in the self-reporting and valuation of pain and discomfort on the EQ-5D.

Authors:  Yan Feng; Mike Herdman; Floortje van Nooten; Charles Cleeland; David Parkin; Shunya Ikeda; Ataru Igarashi; Nancy J Devlin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  NCI's publication affiliation conundrum: Reframing innovation to incentivize an equitable path for advocate representation.

Authors:  Susan Samson; Jason J Northey; Irene Acerbi; Andrei Goga; Carl L Flink; Valerie M Weaver; Mark A LaBarge
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 4.243

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.