Literature DB >> 22045825

Longitudinal predictors of adherence to annual follow-up in a lung cancer screening programme.

Kimberly A Wildstein1, Yolanda Faustini, Rowena Yip, Claudia I Henschke, Jamie S Ostroff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine rates and factors associated with adherence to annual repeat lung cancer screening in two cohorts. Participants and methods The self-pay cohort (n = 2083) was individuals aged 40 years and older with no prior cancer and a smoking history. Participants had to obtain a prescription from their doctor for the low dose, computerized tomography scan (CT), and were responsible for payment of $300 as these CT scans are not typically covered by insurance. The no-pay cohort (n = 1304) was individuals aged 60 and older with a smoking history, and no prior cancer. The initial and one year repeat CT were provided free of charge. Rates of adherence for each cohort were analyzed by demographic variables, smoking history, family history of lung cancer, smoking status (former/current), perceived risk and worry of getting lung cancer and baseline screening CT.
RESULTS: Adherence to annual follow-up was lower for the self-pay than for the no-pay cohort (62% vs. 88%). Both the self-pay and no-pay cohorts had higher adherence rates among Caucasians and those who had a college degree. A greater perceived risk of getting lung cancer increased adherence among the self-pay cohort. Non-calcified nodules found on baseline CT increased the adherence for the self-pay cohort, but decreased the adherence for the no-pay cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings should be used in developing educational materials and targeted retention strategies to increase adherence with repeat lung cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22045825     DOI: 10.1258/jms.2011.010127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  12 in total

1.  Primary Care Providers and a System Problem: A Qualitative Study of Clinicians Caring for Patients With Incidental Pulmonary Nodules.

Authors:  Sara E Golden; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Donald Sullivan; Linda Ganzini; Christopher G Slatore
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Association of Rurality With Annual Repeat Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Lucy B Spalluto; Jennifer A Lewis; Lauren R Samuels; Carol Callaway-Lane; Michael E Matheny; Jason Denton; Jennifer A Robles; Robert S Dittus; David F Yankelevitz; Claudia I Henschke; Pierre P Massion; Drew Moghanaki; Christianne L Roumie
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Racial Disparities in Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening and Recommended Follow-Up Care: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Authors:  Roger Y Kim; Katharine A Rendle; Nandita Mitra; Chelsea A Saia; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Robert T Greenlee; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Stacey A Honda; Michael J Simoff; Marilyn M Schapira; Jennifer M Croswell; Rafael Meza; Debra P Ritzwoller; Anil Vachani
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2022-09

4.  Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of the 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation for Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Iakovos Toumazis; Koen de Nijs; Pianpian Cao; Mehrad Bastani; Vidit Munshi; Kevin Ten Haaf; Jihyoun Jeon; G Scott Gazelle; Eric J Feuer; Harry J de Koning; Rafael Meza; Chung Yin Kong; Summer S Han; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 33.006

Review 5.  Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography for primary care providers.

Authors:  Thomas B Richards; Mary C White; Ralph S Caraballo
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.907

6.  Prevalence and Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening in Karachi, Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Smokers and Physicians.

Authors:  Aleeza Abbasi; Rabbia Siddiqi; Aatika Owais; Tooba Laeeq; Sara N Ali; Zonaira Mushahid; Syed M Ahsan; Aliya S Jatoi; Aleena Abbasi; Ifrah Butt; Ruba Ali; Maham Abbasi; Syeda Naintara N Jaffri; Mariam Jabir; Hajra Khanani; Kaneez Fatima
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-05-15

Review 7.  Participation in lung cancer screening programs: are there gender and social differences? A systematic review.

Authors:  Stefanie Schütte; Damien Dietrich; Xavier Montet; Antoine Flahault
Journal:  Public Health Rev       Date:  2018-08-15

8.  Determinants Associated With Longitudinal Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Analysis of Claims Data.

Authors:  Erin A Hirsch; Anna E Barón; Betsy Risendal; Jamie L Studts; Melissa L New; Stephen P Malkoski
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 6.240

9.  Prevalence and burden of bronchiectasis in a lung cancer screening program.

Authors:  Maria Sanchez-Carpintero Abad; Pablo Sanchez-Salcedo; Juan P de-Torres; Ana B Alcaide; Luis M Seijo; Jesus Pueyo; Gorka Bastarrika; Javier J Zulueta; Arantza Campo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Screening for Lung Cancer: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Gerard A Silvestri; Lesley H Souter; Tanner J Caverly; Jeffrey P Kanne; Hormuzd A Katki; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 9.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.