Literature DB >> 22045678

Female gender and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: results from a large registry.

Jason C Kovacic1, Roxana Mehran, Rucha Karajgikar, Usman Baber, Javed Suleman, Michael C Kim, Prakash Krishnan, George Dangas, Samin K Sharma, Annapoorna Kini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate if previously reported gender-based outcome disparities following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are applicable in a large and racially-diverse cohort in the drug eluting stent (DES) era.
BACKGROUND: It is generally believed that women suffer inferior outcomes compared to men after PCI. However, various strategies have evolved that may have mitigated this imbalance, including improved medical therapy, attention to risk-factors, and procedural advances of PCI including DES.
METHODS: We identified 13,752 patients (4,761 female, 34.6%) with complete follow-up data who underwent de novo lesion PCI from 04/2003 to 04/2009. Relevant data were extracted from an IRB-approved registry.
RESULTS: Compared to males, females were significantly older (69.0 vs. 64.8 years) and more frequently from a minority or non-Caucasian background. Females smoked less, but more were hypertensive and/or diabetic. Women had higher HDL, but also higher LDL cholesterol levels. More women presented with an unstable coronary syndrome and required left anterior descending artery PCI. While unadjusted post-PCI mortality rates were higher in females versus males (30 days, 1.3 vs. 0.8%, P = 0.009; 1 year, 6.1 vs. 4.8%, P = 0.001; 3 year, 10.4 vs. 8.4%, P < 0.0001), multivariable regression analyses failed to identify female gender as an independent predictor of mortality. Propensity-adjusted modeling confirmed that females were not at intrinsically higher risk for mortality after PCI.
CONCLUSIONS: Females undergoing PCI exhibit more comorbidities and adverse prognostic factors than males. However, risk-adjusted analyses identified that gender is not an independent predictor of mortality after PCI in the DES era.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22045678     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  6 in total

1.  Sex Differences in Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention According to Age.

Authors:  Kelly C Epps; Elizabeth M Holper; Faith Selzer; Helen A Vlachos; Sarah K Gualano; J Dawn Abbott; Alice K Jacobs; Oscar C Marroquin; Srihari S Naidu; Peter W Groeneveld; Robert L Wilensky
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2016-02

2.  Culprit plaque characteristics in women vs men with a first ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: In vivo optical coherence tomography insights.

Authors:  Rong Sun; Liping Sun; Yandong Fu; Huimin Liu; Maoen Xu; Xuefeng Ren; Huai Yu; Hui Dong; Yang Liu; Yinchun Zhu; Jinwei Tian; Bo Yu
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Gender-Based Long-Term Outcomes After Revascularization for Three-Vessel Coronary Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large Cohort.

Authors:  Yuguo Liu; Yifan Zhu; Junjie Wang; Da Yin; Haichen Lv; Shenglin Qu; Xuchen Zhou; Hao Zhu; Lei Guo; Yuming Li
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.829

4.  Bivalirudin versus Heparin plus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Haiyan Xu; Bingjian Wang; Jing Yang; Shuren Ma; Xiongwei Xie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sex differences in long-term outcomes of coronary patients treated with drug-eluting stents at a tertiary medical center.

Authors:  Nicolas W Shammas; Gail A Shammas; Michael Jerin; Peter Sharis
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2014-09-09

6.  Sex-Related Differences in Patients at High Bleeding Risk Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Patient-Level Pooled Analysis From 4 Postapproval Studies.

Authors:  Rishi Chandiramani; Davide Cao; Bimmer E Claessen; Sabato Sorrentino; Paul Guedeney; Moritz Blum; Ridhima Goel; Anastasios Roumeliotis; Mitchell Krucoff; Ken Kozuma; Junbo Ge; Ashok Seth; Raj Makkar; Sripal Bangalore; Deepak L Bhatt; Dominick J Angiolillo; Karine Ruster; Jin Wang; Shigeru Saito; Franz-Josef Neumann; James Hermiller; Marco Valgimigli; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 5.501

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.