Literature DB >> 22045112

Use of OROS® hydromorphone in the treatment of osteoarthritis and osteoporosis: A pooled analysis of three non-interventional studies focusing on different starting doses.

Johann D Ringe1, Susanne Schäfer, Antonie M Wimmer, Thorsten Giesecke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a lower starting dose of OROS® hydromorphone compared with a higher starting dose.
DESIGN: Data from the first 15 days of treatment were compared in a combined analysis of three prospective, non-interventional studies.
SETTING: Non-interventional, carried out in daily routine settings. PATIENTS: Patients had chronic severe pain due to osteoarthritis or from fragility fractures related to osteoporosis.
INTERVENTIONS: OROS-ANA-4001 and OROS-ANA-4002 had a daily starting dose of 8 mg of OROS® hydromorphone; OROS-ANA-4003 had a daily starting dose of 4 mg. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): A post-hoc analysis to assess the effect of a low starting dose of OROS® hydromorphone on tolerability, pain control, and treatment satisfaction overall and for subgroups of opioid-naïve patients versus patients previously treated with opioids, and patients aged >65 years versus patients aged ≤65 years.
RESULTS: Treatment satisfaction and pain control improved in all studies; treatment satisfaction improved in a higher percentage of patients in the lower starting dose group. Gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events. Incidence of nausea was comparable between studies. Incidence of constipation, vomiting, fatigue, and pruritus was less frequent with the lower starting dose. In elderly and opioid-naïve patients, a lower starting dose was associated with lower overall incidence of adverse events, treatment-related adverse events, and those leading to discontinuation.
CONCLUSIONS: A lower starting dose was associated with better tolerability and a lower number of treatment terminations at a comparable level of pain control with high treatment satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22045112     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-011-0076-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  23 in total

1.  Input characteristics and bioavailability after administration of immediate and a new extended-release formulation of hydromorphone in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  David R Drover; Martin S Angst; Marta Valle; Bhamini Ramaswamy; Sujata Naidu; Donald R Stanski; Davide Verotta
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 2.  Opioid therapy for chronic pain.

Authors:  Jane C Ballantyne; Jianren Mao
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Direct and indirect costs attributable to osteoarthritis in active subjects.

Authors:  Véronique Rabenda; Christelle Manette; Régine Lemmens; Anne-Marie Mariani; Nicole Struvay; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  A Phase III study to assess the clinical utility of low-dose fentanyl transdermal system in patients with chronic nonmalignant pain.

Authors:  James Otis; Margaret Rothman
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.580

5.  A randomized study to demonstrate noninferiority of once-daily OROS(®) hydromorphone with twice-daily sustained-release oxycodone for moderate to severe chronic noncancer pain.

Authors:  Heinrich Binsfeld; Leszek Szczepanski; Sandra Waechter; Ute Richarz; Rainer Sabatowski
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Extended-release tramadol in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Theophilus J Gana; Maria Luz G Pascual; Rosa Rosanna B Fleming; Jeff R Schein; Carmela C Janagap; Jim Xiang; Gary J Vorsanger
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.580

7.  The economic burden of disabling hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) from the perspective of individuals living with this condition.

Authors:  S Gupta; G A Hawker; A Laporte; R Croxford; P C Coyte
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 7.580

8.  Dose conversion and titration with a novel, once-daily, OROS osmotic technology, extended-release hydromorphone formulation in the treatment of chronic malignant or nonmalignant pain.

Authors:  Mark Palangio; Donald W Northfelt; Russell K Portenoy; Daniel Brookoff; Ralph T Doyle; Bruce E Dornseif; Michael C Damask
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Comparison of opioid requirements and analgesic response in opioid-tolerant versus opioid-naïve patients after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Asad E Patanwala; Donna L Jarzyna; Michael D Miller; Brian L Erstad
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.705

10.  Pharmacokinetic profile of a 24-hour controlled-release OROS formulation of hydromorphone in the presence and absence of food.

Authors:  Gayatri Sathyan; Emily Xu; John Thipphawong; Suneel K Gupta
Journal:  BMC Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-02-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  A prospective multicentre study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of osmotic release oral system (OROS) hydromorphone in opioid-naive cancer patients: Results of the Korean South West Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Eun-Kee Song; Hyunjeong Shim; Hye-Suk Han; DerSheng Sun; Soon-Il Lee; Myung Hee Kang; KyuTaek Lee; DoYeun Cho; In Sung Cho; Suk Young Park; Samyong Kim; Chang-Yeol Yim
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.037

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.