Literature DB >> 22044519

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC): oncological outcomes and prognostic factors in a large multicentre series.

Alessandro Volpe1, Giacomo Novara, Alessandro Antonelli, Roberto Bertini, Michele Billia, Giorgio Carmignani, Sergio Cosciani Cunico, Nicola Longo, Guido Martignoni, Andrea Minervini, Vincenzo Mirone, Alchiede Simonato, Carlo Terrone, Filiberto Zattoni, Vincenzo Ficarra.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Study Type - Outcomes (cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? About 80% of RCCs have clear cell histology, and consistent data are available about the clinical and histological characteristics of this histological subtype. Conversely, less attention has been dedicated to the study of non-clear cell renal tumours Specifically, published data show that chromophobe RCC (ChRCC) have often favourable pathological stages and better nuclear grades as well as a lower risk of metastasizing compared with clear cell RCC (ccRCC). Patients with ChRCC were shown to have significantly higher cancer-specific survival (CSS) probabilities compared with ccRCC. However, an independent prognostic role of RCC histotype was not confirmed in some large multicenter series and only a few studies have focused on the oncological outcomes of ChRCC. The present study is one of the few to evaluate cancer-related outcomes of ChRCC and represents to our knowledge the largest series of ChRCCs. Consequently, the present findings may assist in elucidating the natural history of surgically treated ChRCC. The present study confirms that ChRCCs have good prognosis and a low tendency to progress and metastasize. Only 1.3% of patients presented with distant metastases at diagnosis, and the 5- and 10-year CSS were 93% and 88.9%, respectively. However, although ChRCCs are generally characterised by an excellent prognosis, we observed that patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancers as well as those with sarcomatoid differentiation have a poor outcome. The study also investigated prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and CSS for this RCC histotype. The definition of outcome predictors can be useful for patient counselling, planning of follow-up strategies, and patient selection for clinical trials. In the present study, gender, clinical T stage, pathological T stage, and presence of sarcomatoid differentiation were significantly associated with RFS and CSS at multivariable analysis. We also identified N/M stage as an independent predictor of CSS. Notably, as Fuhrman grade was not an independent predictor of cancer-related outcomes, the present study confirms that this histological variable is not a reliable prognostic factor for ChRCC.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate cancer-related outcomes of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) in a large multicentre dataset. To determine prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for this RCC histological type. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 291 patients with ChRCC were identified from a multi-institutional retrospective database including 5463 patients who were surgically treated for RCC at 16 Italian academic centres between 1995 and 2007. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to identify prognostic factors predictive of RFS and CSS after surgery for ChRCC.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 44 months, 25 patients (8.6%) had disease recurrence and 18 patients (6.2%) died from disease. The 5-year RFS and CSS rates were 89.3% and 93%, respectively. Gender (P= 0.014), clinical T stage (P= 0.017), pathological T stage (P= 0.003), and sarcomatoid differentiation (P= 0.032) were independent predictors of RFS at multivariable analysis. For CSS, there was an independent prognostic role for gender (P= 0.032) and T stage (P= 0.019) among the clinical variables and for T stage (P= 0.016), N/M stage (P= 0.023), and sarcomatoid differentiation (P= 0.015) among the pathological variables.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ChRCC have a low risk of tumour progression, metastasis, and cancer-specific death. Patient gender, clinical and pathological tumour stage, and sarcomatoid differentiation are significant predictors of RFS and CSS for ChRCC.
© 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22044519     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10690.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  42 in total

1.  Genomic landscape and evolution of metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jozefina Casuscelli; Nils Weinhold; Gunes Gundem; Lu Wang; Emily C Zabor; Esther Drill; Patricia I Wang; Gouri J Nanjangud; Almedina Redzematovic; Amrita M Nargund; Brandon J Manley; Maria E Arcila; Nicholas M Donin; John C Cheville; R Houston Thompson; Allan J Pantuck; Paul Russo; Emily H Cheng; William Lee; Satish K Tickoo; Irina Ostrovnaya; Chad J Creighton; Elli Papaemmanuil; Venkatraman E Seshan; A Ari Hakimi; James J Hsieh
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2017-06-15

2.  Tremendous non-progressed chromophobe renal cell carcinoma for eight years performed by laparoscope.

Authors:  Yanbo Wang; Xiaobo Ding; Xiaobo Ma; Lingbo Yang; Faping Li; Chunxi Wang; Yuchuan Hou
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Targeted therapeutic strategies for the management of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Eric A Singer; Gopal N Gupta; Ramaprasad Srinivasan
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.645

4.  Metastatic Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: Presence or Absence of Sarcomatoid Differentiation Determines Clinical Course and Treatment Outcomes.

Authors:  Yasser Ged; Ying-Bei Chen; Andrea Knezevic; Jozefina Casuscelli; Almedina Redzematovic; Renzo G DiNatale; Maria I Carlo; Chung-Han Lee; Darren R Feldman; Sujata Patil; A Ari Hakimi; Paul Russo; Robert J Motzer; Martin H Voss
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.872

5.  Urinary aquaporin 1 and perilipin 2: Can these novel markers accurately characterize small renal masses and help guide patient management?

Authors:  Joseph B Song; Jeremiah J Morrissey; Jonathan M Mobley; Karen G Figenshau; Joel M Vetter; Sam B Bhayani; Evan D Kharasch; Robert Sherburne Figenshau
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.369

6.  [Postoperative prognosis of chromophobic renal cell carcinoma: comparative analysis of the multinational CORONA database].

Authors:  M May; R Zigeuner; A Aziz; L Cindolo; C Gilfrich; L Schips; O De Cobelli; B Rocco; C De Nunzio; A Tubaro; I Coman; B Feciche; M Truss; B Hoschke; O Dalpiaz; A Stoltze; F Fenske; H-M Fritsche; T Chromecki; S Lebentrau; R S Figenshau; K Madison; M Sánchez-Chapado; M Del Carmen Santiago Martin; L Salzano; G Lotrecchiano; S Joniau; R Waidelich; C G Stief; S Brookman-May
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Correlating Preoperative Imaging with Histologic Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma and Common Mimickers.

Authors:  Jennifer Gordetsky; Jessica Zarzour
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  [Noninvasive phenotyping of renal tumors-current state of the art].

Authors:  Hubert Stefan Bickel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 9.  Molecular profiling of renal cell carcinoma: building a bridge toward clinical impact.

Authors:  Brandon J Manley; Abraham Ari Hakimi
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.309

10.  Differential radiologic characteristics of renal tumours on multiphasic computed tomography.

Authors:  Boon Chye Ching; Hui Shan Tan; Puay Hoon Tan; Chee Keong Toh; Ravindran Kanesvaran; Quan Sing Ng; Min Han Tan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 1.858

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.