Literature DB >> 22044180

Assortative mating in morningness-eveningness.

Christoph Randler1, Stefanie Kretz.   

Abstract

Individuals differ in their morningness-eveningness preference (circadian preference); that is, some prefer morning hours for intellectual and physical activities and others prefer late afternoon or evening hours. This has been viewed as an interesting facet of personality. Assortative mating has been studied in personality research, but assortative mating in circadian preference has rarely been examined. Eighty-four couples participated in this study. They filled in the Composite Scale of Morningness; they also supplied data about rise times and bedtimes as well as information about relationship satisfaction and duration. The results revealed a moderate positive relationship between couple partners in morningness-eveningness which persisted after correcting for age. Similarly, correlations existed between the sleep-wake variables (rise time and bedtime) on weekdays and on the weekends, the association being higher for weekends. There was no significant correlation between length of the relationship and dissimilarity in morningness-eveningness, suggesting that the above-reported correlations reflect an initial assortment rather than convergence effects. Further, no significant correlation was found between dissimilarity in morningness-eveningness and relationship satisfaction. The results suggest that assortative mating in morningness-eveningness is likely and is probably based on an initial assortment. The likelihood to meet and mate may also be linked to chronotype. When differences in circadian preferences exist between possible partners, this reduces the likelihood that these persons meet either by accident or during work and leisure activities. Therefore, two extreme chronotypes are unlikely to meet each other because they have the smallest overlap in their preferred active time during the day due to the circadian rhythmicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22044180     DOI: 10.1080/00207594.2010.518237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychol        ISSN: 0020-7594


  7 in total

1.  Polymorphisms in the circadian expressed genes PER3 and ARNTL2 are associated with diurnal preference and GNβ3 with sleep measures.

Authors:  Michael J Parsons; Kathryn J Lester; Nicola L Barclay; Simon N Archer; Patrick M Nolan; Thalia C Eley; Alice M Gregory
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.981

2.  Similarity in Chronotype and Preferred Time for Sex and Its Role in Relationship Quality and Sexual Satisfaction.

Authors:  Paulina Jocz; Maciej Stolarski; Konrad S Jankowski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-04

3.  Chronotyping glaucoma patients with the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire: A case-control study.

Authors:  Ronald A J M Bierings; Marijke C M Gordijn; Nomdo M Jansonius
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Chronotype assessment via a large scale socio-demographic survey favours yearlong Standard time over Daylight Saving Time in central Europe.

Authors:  Martin Sládek; Michaela Kudrnáčová Röschová; Věra Adámková; Dana Hamplová; Alena Sumová
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  COVID-19 Pandemic on Fire: Evolved Propensities for Nocturnal Activities as a Liability Against Epidemiological Control.

Authors:  Marco Antonio Correa Varella; Severi Luoto; Rafael Bento da Silva Soares; Jaroslava Varella Valentova
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-22

6.  Evening chronotype is associated with changes in eating behavior, more sleep apnea, and increased stress hormones in short sleeping obese individuals.

Authors:  Eliane A Lucassen; Xiongce Zhao; Kristina I Rother; Megan S Mattingly; Amber B Courville; Lilian de Jonge; Gyorgy Csako; Giovanni Cizza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Two in a bed: The influence of couple sleeping and chronotypes on relationship and sleep. An overview.

Authors:  Kneginja Richter; Sophia Adam; Lennard Geiss; Lukas Peter; Guenter Niklewski
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.877

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.