Literature DB >> 22042954

Genetic activation of the MET pathway and prognosis of patients with high-risk, radically resected gastric cancer.

Francesco Graziano1, Nadia Galluccio, Paola Lorenzini, Annamaria Ruzzo, Emanuele Canestrari, Silvia D'Emidio, Vincenzo Catalano, Valerio Sisti, Claudia Ligorio, Francesca Andreoni, Eliana Rulli, Enrico Di Oto, Giammaria Fiorentini, Costantino Zingaretti, Michele De Nictolis, Federico Cappuzzo, Mauro Magnani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether prognosis of patients with high-risk gastric cancer may depend on MET copy number gain (CNG) or an activating truncation within a deoxyadenosine tract element (DATE) in the promoter region of the MET ligand HGF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-institution cohort of 230 patients with stage II/III gastric cancer was studied. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens were used for DNA extraction. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for MET CNG and sequencing for HGF DATE truncation (< 25 deoxyadenosines instead of 30) were used. Results were analyzed for association with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). To assess the reliability of the qPCR measurement, a random sample of cases was reanalyzed using an alternative assay (fluorescent in situ hybridization [FISH]) with calculation of the intracorrelation coefficient (ICC).
RESULTS: In 216 assessable patients, MET CNG five or more copies and homozygous HGF-truncated DATE occurred in 21 patients (10%) and 30 patients (13%), respectively. Patients with MET CNG five or more copies (MET-positive) showed significantly worse prognosis with multivariate hazard ratio (HR) of 3.02 (95% CI, 1.71 to 5.33; P < .001) for DFS and multivariate HR of 2.91 (95% CI, 1.65 to 5.11; P < .001) for OS. The agreement between qPCR and FISH was high, with ICC = 0.9% (95% CI, 0.81% to 0.95%; the closer the ICC is to 1, the greater is the agreement). HGF-truncated DATE did not show relevant prognostic effect.
CONCLUSION: In this study, qPCR revealed approximately 10% of white patients with gastric cancer harboring MET CNG of five or more copies. This marker was significantly associated with unfavorable prognosis. This information is relevant to the current clinical development of anti-MET compounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22042954     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.7706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  75 in total

Review 1.  Molecular-targeted first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Huan Song; Jianwei Zhu; DongHao Lu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-19

Review 2.  Update on Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma Targeted Therapies.

Authors:  Steven B Maron; Daniel V T Catenacci
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.722

Review 3.  Novel Targeted Therapies for Esophagogastric Cancer.

Authors:  Steven B Maron; Daniel V T Catenacci
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 4.  Operable gastro-oesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma: Where to next?

Authors:  Elizabeth C Smyth; David Cunningham
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-06-15

5.  The prognostic impact of EGFR, ErbB2 and MET gene amplification in human gastric carcinomas as measured by quantitative Real-Time PCR.

Authors:  Ghasem Janbabai; Ziaeddin Oladi; Touraj Farazmandfar; Tarang Taghvaei; Farshad Naghshvar
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  A phase II trial of a selective c-Met inhibitor tivantinib (ARQ 197) monotherapy as a second- or third-line therapy in the patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yoon-Koo Kang; Kei Muro; Min-Hee Ryu; Hirofumi Yasui; Tomohiro Nishina; Baek-Yeol Ryoo; Yukimasa Kamiya; Shiro Akinaga; Narikazu Boku
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  Revisiting MET: Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic, MET-Amplified Esophagogastric Cancers.

Authors:  Surendra Pal Chaudhary; Eunice L Kwak; Jeffrey W Clark; Theodore S Hong; Katie L Hwang; Jochen K Lennerz; Ryan B Corcoran; Rebecca S Heist; Andrea L Russo; Aparna Parikh; Darrell R Borger; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Jason E Faris; Janet E Murphy; Christopher G Azzoli; Eric J Roeland; Lipika Goyal; Jill Allen; John T Mullen; David P Ryan; A John Iafrate; Samuel J Klempner
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-09-12

8.  X chromosome gain is related to increased androgen receptor expression in male breast cancer.

Authors:  Enrico Di Oto; Giovanni B Biserni; Zsuzsanna Varga; Luca Morandi; Maria C Cucchi; Riccardo Masetti; Maria P Foschini
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 9.  MET-targeted therapy for gastric cancer: the importance of a biomarker-based strategy.

Authors:  Hisato Kawakami; Isamu Okamoto
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  The OCT4 pseudogene POU5F1B is amplified and promotes an aggressive phenotype in gastric cancer.

Authors:  H Hayashi; T Arao; Y Togashi; H Kato; Y Fujita; M A De Velasco; H Kimura; K Matsumoto; K Tanaka; I Okamoto; A Ito; Y Yamada; K Nakagawa; K Nishio
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.