Literature DB >> 22042376

Modeling the pharmacodynamics of passive membrane permeability.

Robert V Swift1, Rommie E Amaro.   

Abstract

Small molecule permeability through cellular membranes is critical to a better understanding of pharmacodynamics and the drug discovery endeavor. Such permeability may be estimated as a function of the free energy change of barrier crossing by invoking the barrier domain model, which posits that permeation is limited by passage through a single "barrier domain" and assumes diffusivity differences among compounds of similar structure are negligible. Inspired by the work of Rezai and co-workers (JACS 128:14073-14080, 2006), we estimate this free energy change as the difference in implicit solvation free energies in chloroform and water, but extend their model to include solute conformational affects. Using a set of eleven structurally diverse FDA approved compounds and a set of thirteen congeneric molecules, we show that the solvation free energies are dominated by the global minima, which allows solute conformational distributions to be effectively neglected. For the set of tested compounds, the best correlation with experiment is obtained when the implicit chloroform global minimum is used to evaluate the solvation free energy difference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22042376      PMCID: PMC3223344          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-011-9480-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  17 in total

1.  Caco-2 permeability of weakly basic drugs predicted with the double-sink PAMPA pKa(flux) method.

Authors:  Alex Avdeef; Per Artursson; Sibylle Neuhoff; Lucia Lazorova; Johan Gråsjö; Staffan Tavelin
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  Ligand configurational entropy and protein binding.

Authors:  Chia-en A Chang; Wei Chen; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Implicit solvent models.

Authors:  B Roux; T Simonson
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  1999-04-05       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Conformational flexibility, internal hydrogen bonding, and passive membrane permeability: successful in silico prediction of the relative permeabilities of cyclic peptides.

Authors:  Taha Rezai; Jonathan E Bock; Mai V Zhou; Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; R Scott Lokey; Matthew P Jacobson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 5.  Continuum molecular electrostatics, salt effects, and counterion binding--a review of the Poisson-Boltzmann theory and its modifications.

Authors:  Paweł Grochowski; Joanna Trylska
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.505

6.  Locally accessible conformations of proteins: multiple molecular dynamics simulations of crambin.

Authors:  L S Caves; J D Evanseck; M Karplus
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 7.  The rise of PAMPA.

Authors:  Alex Avdeef
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 8.  The skin's barrier.

Authors:  J M Jensen; E Proksch
Journal:  G Ital Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.011

9.  The barrier domain for solute permeation varies with lipid bilayer phase structure.

Authors:  T Xiang; Y Xu; B D Anderson
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 1.843

10.  In silico prediction of human oral absorption based on QSAR analyses of PAMPA permeability.

Authors:  Miki Akamatsu; Masaaki Fujikawa; Kazuya Nakao; Ryo Shimizu
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.408

View more
  7 in total

1.  Drug permeability prediction using PMF method.

Authors:  Fancui Meng; Weiren Xu
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Testing physical models of passive membrane permeation.

Authors:  Siegfried S F Leung; Jona Mijalkovic; Kenneth Borrelli; Matthew P Jacobson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Prediction of Membrane Permeation of Drug Molecules by Combining an Implicit Membrane Model with Machine Learning.

Authors:  Stephanie A Brocke; Alexandra Degen; Alexander D MacKerell; Bercem Dutagaci; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Physics-Based Method for Modeling Passive Membrane Permeability and Translocation Pathways of Bioactive Molecules.

Authors:  Andrei L Lomize; Irina D Pogozheva
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 5.  Back to the future: can physical models of passive membrane permeability help reduce drug candidate attrition and move us beyond QSPR?

Authors:  Robert V Swift; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.817

6.  Selective effect of cell membrane on synaptic neurotransmission.

Authors:  Pekka A Postila; Ilpo Vattulainen; Tomasz Róg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Molecular dynamics simulations and experimental studies reveal differential permeability of withaferin-A and withanone across the model cell membrane.

Authors:  Renu Wadhwa; Neetu Singh Yadav; Shashank P Katiyar; Tomoko Yaguchi; Chohee Lee; Hyomin Ahn; Chae-Ok Yun; Sunil C Kaul; Durai Sundar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.