Literature DB >> 22042215

Statement of the American Society Of Addiction Medicine Consensus Panel on the use of buprenorphine in office-based treatment of opioid addiction.

Mark L Kraus1, Daniel P Alford, Margaret M Kotz, Petros Levounis, Todd W Mandell, Marjorie Meyer, Edwin A Salsitz, Norman Wetterau, Stephen A Wyatt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Opioid addiction affects over 2 million patients in the United States. The advent of buprenorphine and the passage of the Drug Addiction Treatment Act in 2000 have revolutionized the opioid treatment delivery system by granting physicians the ability to administer office-based opioid treatment (OBOT), thereby giving patients greater access to treatment. The purpose of this consensus panel was to synthesize the most current evidence on the use of buprenorphine in the office-based setting and to make recommendations that will enable and allow additional physicians to begin to treat opioid-addicted individuals.
METHODS: Literature published from 2000 to 2009 was searched using the PubMed search engine and yielded over 375 articles published in peer-reviewed journals, including some that were published guidelines. These articles were submitted to a consensus panel composed of researchers, educators, and clinicians who are leaders in the field of addiction medicine with specific expertise in the use of OBOT. The panel discussed results and agreed upon consensus recommendations for several facets of OBOT.
RESULTS: : On the basis of the literature review and consensus discussions, the panel developed a series of findings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding the use of buprenorphine in office-based treatment of opioid addiction.
CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic outcomes for patients who self-select office-based treatment with buprenorphine are essentially comparable to those seen in patients treated with methadone programs. There are few absolute contraindications to the use of buprenorphine, although the experience and skill levels of treating physicians can vary considerably, as can access to the resources needed to treat comorbid medical or psychiatric conditions--all of which affect outcomes. It is important to conduct a targeted assessment of every patient to confirm that the provider has resources available to meet the patient's needs. Patients should be assessed for a broad array of biopsychosocial needs in addition to opioid use and addiction, and should be treated, referred, or both for help in meeting all their care needs, including medical care, psychiatric care, and social assistance. Current literature demonstrates promising efficacy of buprenorphine, though further research will continue to demonstrate its effectiveness for special populations, such as adolescents, pregnant women, and other vulnerable populations. Since the time of this review, several new studies have provided new data to continue to improve our understanding of the safety and efficacy of buprenorphine for special patient populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22042215     DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e3182312983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Addict Med        ISSN: 1932-0620            Impact factor:   3.702


  34 in total

1.  Buprenorphine implant for opioid addiction.

Authors:  Walter Ling
Journal:  Pain Manag       Date:  2012-07

2.  Tapering off and returning to buprenorphine maintenance in a primary care Office Based Addiction Treatment (OBAT) program.

Authors:  Zoe M Weinstein; Gabriela Gryczynski; Debbie M Cheng; Emily Quinn; David Hui; Hyunjoong W Kim; Colleen Labelle; Jeffrey H Samet
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  A combination of buprenorphine and naltrexone blocks compulsive cocaine intake in rodents without producing dependence.

Authors:  Sunmee Wee; Leandro F Vendruscolo; Kaushik K Misra; Joel E Schlosburg; George F Koob
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Practice Guidance for Buprenorphine for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorders: Results of an Expert Panel Process.

Authors:  Carrie M Farmer; Dawn Lindsay; Jessica Williams; Amanda Ayers; James Schuster; Alyssa Cilia; Michael T Flaherty; Todd Mandell; Adam J Gordon; Bradley D Stein
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.716

5.  National and State Treatment Need and Capacity for Opioid Agonist Medication-Assisted Treatment.

Authors:  Christopher M Jones; Melinda Campopiano; Grant Baldwin; Elinore McCance-Katz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Management of opioid use disorders: a national clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Julie Bruneau; Keith Ahamad; Marie-Ève Goyer; Ginette Poulin; Peter Selby; Benedikt Fischer; T Cameron Wild; Evan Wood
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Methadone Versus Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Dependence and Risk of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.

Authors:  Lara S Lemon; Steve N Caritis; Raman Venkataramanan; Robert W Platt; Lisa M Bodnar
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Analgesic Effects of Hydromorphone versus Buprenorphine in Buprenorphine-maintained Individuals.

Authors:  Andrew S Huhn; Eric C Strain; George E Bigelow; Michael T Smith; Robert R Edwards; D Andrew Tompkins
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Long-term retention in Office Based Opioid Treatment with buprenorphine.

Authors:  Zoe M Weinstein; Hyunjoong W Kim; Debbie M Cheng; Emily Quinn; David Hui; Colleen T Labelle; Mari-Lynn Drainoni; Sara S Bachman; Jeffrey H Samet
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2016-12-30

Review 10.  Long term outcomes of pharmacological treatments for opioid dependence: does methadone still lead the pack?

Authors:  Maria Paz Garcia-Portilla; Maria Teresa Bobes-Bascaran; Maria Teresa Bascaran; Pilar Alejandra Saiz; Julio Bobes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.