Literature DB >> 22041994

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: keeping the bridge for one night.

Ahmed R El-Nahas1, Ahmed A Shokeir.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare nephrostomy-free percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with early nephrostomy tube removal (after 1 day). A prospective study started from January 2008 through December 2009 and included patients who underwent non-complicated PCNL through a single tract without intra-operative residual stones. Nephrostomy-free technique was performed during 2008 (nephrostomy-free group). During 2009, a nephrostomy tube was placed for 1 day (1-day nephrostomy group). Both groups were compared for post-operative events, dose of analgesia, hemoglobin deficit and hospital stay. The study included 55 patients (27 in nephrostomy-free group and 28 in 1-day nephrostomy group). There were no statistically significant differences between patients, renal and stone characteristics of both groups. Post-operative events were significantly more in nephrostomy-free group (26 vs. 14.3%, p = 0.039). They include hematuria in three (11.1%) of nephrostomy-free patients and one (3.6%) of 1-day nephrostomy patient, severe renal colic in four patients of nephrostomy-free group (14.8%), and temporary urinary leakage via the nephrostomy site in three patients of 1-day nephrostomy group (10.7%). Mean dose of post-operative analgesia, mean hemoglobin deficit and hospital days were comparable for both groups (p = 0.946, 0.541, 0.807, respectively). A second look PCNL was performed through the already present tract to retrieve residual stones in two patients with nephrostomy. In conclusion, 1-day nephrostomy technique after PCNL showed significantly better post-operative course. It was comparable to nephrostomy-free technique in analgesic requirements and hospital stay. The nephrostomy tube provided a bridge for second look nephroscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22041994     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-011-0432-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  24 in total

1.  Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique.

Authors:  I Fernström; B Johansson
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1976

Review 2.  Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy--the new standard of care?

Authors:  D E Zilberman; M E Lipkin; J J de la Rosette; M N Ferrandino; C Mamoulakis; M P Laguna; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective feasibility study and review of previous reports.

Authors:  Hemendra N Shah; Vikram B Kausik; Sunil S Hegde; Jignesh N Shah; Manish B Bansal
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Long-term results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn stones.

Authors:  Ahmed R El-Nahas; Ibrahim Eraky; Ahmed A Shokeir; Ahmed M Shoma; Ahmed M El-Assmy; Nasr A El-Tabey; Hamdy A El-Kappany; Mahmoud R El-Kenawy
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Questioning the wisdom of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a prospective randomized controlled study of early tube removal vs tubeless PCNL.

Authors:  Shashikant Mishra; Ravindra B Sabnis; Abraham Kurien; Arvind Ganpule; Veeramani Muthu; Mahesh Desai
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy for renal stones in over 1000 patients.

Authors:  M R el-Kenawy; H A el-Kappany; T A el-Diasty; M A Ghoneim
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1992-05

7.  Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what about replacing the Double-J stent with a ureteral catheter?

Authors:  Pascal Mouracade; Romain Spie; Herve Lang; Didier Jacqmin; Christian Saussine
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it really less morbid?

Authors:  Iqbal Singh; Arvind Singh; Gyanendra Mittal
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  A randomized trial evaluating type of nephrostomy drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: small bore v tubeless.

Authors:  Hemendra N Shah; Hiren S Sodha; Amit A Khandkar; Shabbir Kharodawala; Sunil S Hegde; Manish B Bansal
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized comparison.

Authors:  Ahmet Tefekli; Fatih Altunrende; Kadir Tepeler; Aytul Tas; Sabahattin Aydin; Ahmet Y Muslumanoglu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 2.266

View more
  3 in total

1.  Current trends in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an internet-based survey.

Authors:  Abd Alrahman Ahmad; Omar Alhunaidi; Mohamed Aziz; Mohamed Omar; Ahmed M Al-Kandari; Ahmed El-Nahas; Mohamed El-Shazly
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2017-08-15

2.  The feasibility of multiple-tract mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy as an overnight surgery for the treatment of complex kidney stones.

Authors:  Zhijian Zhao; Shanfeng Yin; Huacai Zhu; Donglong Cheng; Yongda Liu; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Large tube, small tube, tubeless, or totally tubeless?

Authors:  Madhu S Agrawal; Mayank Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.