Literature DB >> 22041812

Is non-directive communication in genetic counseling possible?

M Pennacchini1, C Pensieri.   

Abstract

In 2007, over 560,000 genetic tests were performed in Italy. However, only 70,154 genetic counseling sessions were conducted. Some say that non-directive counseling is necessary so that the patient understands the test results and the different options available and that the physician should not influence the patient's free choice. We need to clarify the meaning of non-directive consultation and if it is in fact possible. Each doctor has his own values and, in order to achieve the intended purpose, he will give information that, with his verbal, para-verbal and body language will guide the patient to one decision or another. Taking into account the axiom of effective communication "You can't NOT communicate", non-directive counseling is very difficult or even impossible. In genetic counseling, the knowledge that the patient receives of the correct diagnosis and related medical facts and of the applicable genetic considerations is basic to the entire process. Nonetheless, such knowledge in itself is not sufficient if it cannot be appropriately imparted to the interested person or persons. We think "persuasion" is not the right method, but instead "convince" meaning "co-win", "win together" may be the best approach to a problem of such great importance. The counselor will have achieved the desired goal with his patient if he is able to channel the emotion towards a mutually beneficial objective. The primary goal is not to persuade but to win-together (convince) with the patient and the unborn child.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22041812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ter        ISSN: 0009-9074


  3 in total

1.  An ethical framework for genetic counseling in the genomic era.

Authors:  Leila Jamal; Will Schupmann; Benjamin E Berkman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.717

2.  Preference for secondary findings in prenatal and pediatric exome sequencing.

Authors:  Kate Swanson; Teresa N Sparks; Billie R Lianoglou; Flavia Chen; Sarah Downum; Sachi Patel; Shannon Rego; Tiffany Yip; Jessica Van Ziffle; Barbara A Koenig; Anne M Slavotinek; Mary E Norton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.242

3.  The use of heuristics in genetic testing decision-making: A qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Bettina Maria Zimmermann; David Martin Shaw; Bernice Elger; Insa Koné
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.