Literature DB >> 22041784

The relation between 6-n-propylthiouracil sensitivity and caries activity in schoolchildren.

B Öter1, I Ulukapı, H Ulukapı, N Topçuoğlu, S Cıldır.   

Abstract

Caries activity tests are being used to assess caries risk in children. In recent years the purpose of most studies has been to develop practical, quick, reliable and economic tests. Clinical studies showed that the difference in sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) is a heritable trait and may influence children's nutritional habits and caries development. The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between PROP sensitivity and caries activity in schoolchildren, in comparison with different caries activity tests. One hundred and twenty children aged between 7 and 12 years (mean age 9.97 ± 1.59) were investigated to determine socioeconomic status and oral hygiene habits, fluoride consumption, DMFT, DMFS, df, dfs, plaque indexes, and nutritional habits. Children were divided into three groups according to their caries risk status based on the Cariogram. The solution test and the PROP-impregnated filter paper test were used together to determine PROP sensitivity. After all associated factors had been controlled, stepwise regression analyses revealed that DMFT and dfs scores were important determinants of PROP. According to dfs, the sensitivity of the Cariogram and of PROP tests was 0.85 and 0.70, respectively, and specificity was 0.32 and 0.33, respectively. There was an inverse significant relationship between PROP sensitivity and DMFT, DMFS, and dfs results (p < 0.01). In conclusion, PROP nontasters were significantly more likely to have high caries risk than PROP tasters (p < 0.01).
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22041784     DOI: 10.1159/000332432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Caries Res        ISSN: 0008-6568            Impact factor:   4.056


  7 in total

1.  Role of taste perception in white spot lesion formation during orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Abrar Alanzi; Marianna Velissariou; Manal Abu Al-Melh; Donald Ferguson; Katerina Kavvadia
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Tissue-Dependent Expression of Bitter Receptor TAS2R38 mRNA.

Authors:  Jennifer E Douglas; Cailu Lin; Corrine J Mansfield; Charles J Arayata; Beverly J Cowart; Andrew I Spielman; Nithin D Adappa; James N Palmer; Noam A Cohen; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Genotype-specific regulation of oral innate immunity by T2R38 taste receptor.

Authors:  Sucheol Gil; Susan Coldwell; Jeanie L Drury; Fabiola Arroyo; Tran Phi; Sanaz Saadat; Danny Kwong; Whasun Oh Chung
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 4.407

4.  TAS2R38 polymorphisms and oral diseases in Thais: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sawita Khimsuksri; Jarin Paphangkorakit; Waranuch Pitiphat; Susan Elaine Coldwell
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 5.  Oral Microbiota-Host Interaction Mediated by Taste Receptors.

Authors:  Hao Dong; Jiaxin Liu; Jianhui Zhu; Zhiyan Zhou; Marco Tizzano; Xian Peng; Xuedong Zhou; Xin Xu; Xin Zheng
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.293

6.  Association between genetic taste sensitivity, 2D:4D ratio, dental caries prevalence, and salivary flow rate in 6-14-year-old children: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Chintamaneni Raja Lakshmi; Doppalapudi Radhika; Mpv Prabhat; Sujana Mulk Bhavana; Nallamilli Sai Madhavi
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2016-08-17

Review 7.  Factors Influencing the Phenotypic Characterization of the Oral Marker, PROP.

Authors:  Beverly J Tepper; Melania Melis; Yvonne Koelliker; Paolo Gasparini; Karen L Ahijevych; Iole Tomassini Barbarossa
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 5.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.