Literature DB >> 22040912

Clinical relevance of Ephs and ephrins in cancer: lessons from breast, colorectal, and lung cancer profiling.

Dana M Brantley-Sieders1.   

Abstract

Pre-clinical studies provide compelling evidence that members of the Eph family of receptor tyrosine kinases and their ephrin ligands promote tumor growth, invasion and metastasis, and neovascularization. Tumor suppressive roles have also been reported for the receptors, and ligand-dependent versus ligand-independent signaling has emerged as one key mechanism underlying tumor suppressive function as opposed to oncogenic effects. Determining how these observations relate to clinical outcome is a crucial step for translating the biological and mechanistic data into new molecularly targeted therapies. Expression profiling in human patient samples bridges this gap and provides valuable clinical relevance to laboratory observations. In addition to analyses performed using privately assembled patient tumor samples, publically available microarray datasets and tissue microarrays linked to clinical data have emerged as tractable tools for addressing the clinical relevance of specific molecules and families of related molecules. This review summarizes the clinical relevance of specific Eph and ephrin molecules in human breast, colorectal, and lung cancers.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22040912      PMCID: PMC3288332          DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol        ISSN: 1084-9521            Impact factor:   7.727


  125 in total

1.  EphrinB reverse signaling contributes to endothelial and mural cell assembly into vascular structures.

Authors:  Ombretta Salvucci; Dragan Maric; Matina Economopoulou; Shuhei Sakakibara; Simone Merlin; Antonia Follenzi; Giovanna Tosato
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Gene expression profile of glioblastoma multiforme invasive phenotype points to new therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Dominique B Hoelzinger; Luigi Mariani; Joachim Weis; Tanja Woyke; Theresa J Berens; Wendy S McDonough; Andrew Sloan; Stephen W Coons; Michael E Berens
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  Evolution, expression, and chromosomal location of a novel receptor tyrosine kinase gene, eph.

Authors:  Y Maru; H Hirai; M C Yoshida; F Takaku
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Reduced expression of EphB2 that parallels invasion and metastasis in colorectal tumours.

Authors:  Dong Li Guo; Ji Zhang; Siu Tsan Yuen; Wai Yin Tsui; Annie S Y Chan; Coral Ho; Jiafu Ji; Suet Yi Leung; Xin Chen
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  A conditional feedback loop regulates Ras activity through EphA2.

Authors:  Madhu Macrae; Richard M Neve; Pablo Rodriguez-Viciana; Christopher Haqq; Jennifer Yeh; Chira Chen; Joe W Gray; Frank McCormick
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 31.743

6.  Phosphoproteomic profiling of NSCLC cells reveals that ephrin B3 regulates pro-survival signaling through Akt1-mediated phosphorylation of the EphA2 receptor.

Authors:  Sara Ståhl; Rui Mm Branca; Ghazal Efazat; Maria Ruzzene; Boris Zhivotovsky; Rolf Lewensohn; Kristina Viktorsson; Janne Lehtiö
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  EphB6 receptor significantly alters invasiveness and other phenotypic characteristics of human breast carcinoma cells.

Authors:  B P Fox; R P Kandpal
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  The EphB6 receptor cooperates with c-Cbl to regulate the behavior of breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Luke Truitt; Tanya Freywald; John DeCoteau; Nigel Sharfe; Andrew Freywald
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  The role of Eph receptors and ephrin ligands in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nirmitha I Herath; Andrew W Boyd
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Prognostic breast cancer signature identified from 3D culture model accurately predicts clinical outcome across independent datasets.

Authors:  Katherine J Martin; Denis R Patrick; Mina J Bissell; Marcia V Fournier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  28 in total

1.  Ligand-dependent EphB1 signaling suppresses glioma invasion and correlates with patient survival.

Authors:  Lei Teng; Mitsutoshi Nakada; Natsuki Furuyama; Hemragul Sabit; Takuya Furuta; Yutaka Hayashi; Takahisa Takino; Yu Dong; Hiroshi Sato; Yoshimichi Sai; Ken-Ichi Miyamoto; Michael E Berens; Shi-Guang Zhao; Jun-Ichiro Hamada
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  JNK signaling mediates EPHA2-dependent tumor cell proliferation, motility, and cancer stem cell-like properties in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Wenqiang Song; Yufang Ma; Jialiang Wang; Dana Brantley-Sieders; Jin Chen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Design and Characterization of Novel EphA2 Agonists for Targeted Delivery of Chemotherapy to Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Bainan Wu; Si Wang; Surya K De; Elisa Barile; Bridget A Quinn; Irina Zharkikh; Angela Purves; John L Stebbins; Robert G Oshima; Paul B Fisher; Maurizio Pellecchia
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2015-07-09

4.  CYCLOPS reveals human transcriptional rhythms in health and disease.

Authors:  Ron C Anafi; Lauren J Francey; John B Hogenesch; Junhyong Kim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Eph receptor tyrosine kinases in cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Jin Chen; Wenqiang Song; Katherine Amato
Journal:  Cytokine Growth Factor Rev       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 7.638

6.  Amino acid conjugates of lithocholic acid as antagonists of the EphA2 receptor.

Authors:  Matteo Incerti; Massimiliano Tognolini; Simonetta Russo; Daniele Pala; Carmine Giorgio; Iftiin Hassan-Mohamed; Roberta Noberini; Elena B Pasquale; Paola Vicini; Silvia Piersanti; Silvia Rivara; Elisabetta Barocelli; Marco Mor; Alessio Lodola
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Loss of EphB6 protein expression in human colorectal cancer correlates with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Libo Peng; Pin Tu; Xuan Wang; Shanshan Shi; Xiaojun Zhou; Jiandong Wang
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.611

Review 8.  Deciphering HIC1 control pathways to reveal new avenues in cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Brian R Rood; Dominique Leprince
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 6.902

Review 9.  Targeting Nanomedicines to Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Specificity of Ligands to Two Different Receptors In Vivo.

Authors:  Amanda K Pearce; Adrian V Fuchs; Nicholas L Fletcher; Kristofer J Thurecht
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Gene expression signatures differentiate uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma from leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Ben Davidson; Vera Maria Abeler; Ellen Hellesylt; Arild Holth; Ie-Ming Shih; Tone Skeie-Jensen; Li Chen; Yanqin Yang; Tian-Li Wang
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.