| Literature DB >> 22040234 |
Wilfred Goldmann1, Kelly Ryan, Paula Stewart, David Parnham, Rosa Xicohtencatl, Nora Fernandez, Ginny Saunders, Otto Windl, Lorenzo González, Alex Bossers, James Foster.
Abstract
The application of genetic breeding programmes to eradicate transmissible spongiform encephalopathies in goats is an important aim for reasons of animal welfare as well as human food safety and food security. Based on the positive impact of Prnp genetics on sheep scrapie in Europe in the past decade, we have established caprine Prnp gene variation in more than 1100 goats from the United Kingdom and studied the association of Prnp alleles with disease phenotypes in 150 scrapie-positive goats. This investigation confirms the association of the Met142 encoding Prnp allele with increased resistance to preclinical and clinical scrapie. It reveals a novel association of the Ser127 encoding allele with a reduced probability to develop clinical signs of scrapie in goats that are already positive for the accumulation of disease-specific prion protein in brain or periphery. A United Kingdom survey of Prnp genotypes in eight common breeds revealed eleven alleles in over thirty genotypes. The Met142 encoding allele had a high overall mean allele frequency of 22.6%, whereas the Ser127 encoding allele frequency was considerably lower with 6.4%. In contrast, a well known resistance associated allele encoding Lys222 was found to be rare (0.9%) in this survey. The analysis of Prnp genotypes in Mexican Criollas goats revealed nine alleles, including a novel Phe to Leu substitution in codon 201, confirming that high genetic variability of Prnp can be found in scrapie-free populations. Our study implies that it should be feasible to lower scrapie prevalence in goat herds in the United Kingdom by genetic selection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22040234 PMCID: PMC3224758 DOI: 10.1186/1297-9716-42-110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Res ISSN: 0928-4249 Impact factor: 3.683
Figure 1Caprine .
Comparison of Prnp allele frequencies [%] between scrapie-affected and healthy herds.
| Scrapie Herds | Herds without scrapie cases | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dairy | Dairy | ||
| S, T, A, N | S, T, A, N | ||
| 699 | 235 | ||
| wt-S | 14.5 | 15.8 | |
| wt-P | 45.5 | 51.9 | |
| S127 | 10.2 | 2.3 | |
| S127* | 4.5 (A, E, J only) | 2.3 | |
| M142 | 26.9 | 25.5 | |
| Q211 | 2.2 | 2.6 | |
| K222 | 0.7 | 0.6 | |
For abbreviations see Table 3 and Figure 1.
*S127 allele frequency after removal of herd B data.
Prnp genotype frequencies [%] of scrapie cases and control goats.
| Herd | A | A | B | B | A | B | E | B | A& | A$ | E* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.3 | 6.6 | 0 | |
| 34.8 | 12.3 | 11.1 | 0 | 23.7 | 6.3 | 66.7 | 1.3 | 4.6 | 21.7 | 12 | |
| 43.9 | 21.5 | 77.8 | 57.1 | 32.8 | 68.7 | 33.3 | 24.6 | 12.5 | 21.2 | 22 | |
| 1.5 | 4.6 | 11.1 | 42.9 | 3.1 | 25 | 0 | 28.3 | 8.6 | 6 | 3.3 | |
| 0 | 7.7 | 0 | 0 | 3.9 | 0 | 0 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 | 0 | 0 | 11.9 | 2.3 | 3 | 3.3 | |
| 10.6 | 29.3 | 0 | 0 | 19.7 | 0 | 0 | 20.1 | 30.5 | 19.7 | 31.9 | |
| 1.6 | 15.4 | 0 | 0 | 8.4 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 | 16.4 | 7 | 7.7 | |
| 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 17.2 | 7.6 | 9.9 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 3.4 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 | 1 | 5.5 | |
| 1.6 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 1.1 | |
Legend: For allele abbreviation see Figure 1. Scr = scrapie; cl = clinical; for definition of group-1 (Gp1) and group-2 (Gp2) see main text, in short: group-1 clinical positive and fallen stock goats, group-2 pre-clinical, PrPd positive goats; Gp1/2 = Gp1+Gp2; ^partial here means one allele in heterozygote could not be unambiguously identified for all positions; &scrapie-free goats, clinically and PrPd negative; $clinically negative goats, randomly selected goats of which approx. 1/3 were tested and found negative for PrPd; *randomly selected clinically negative herd-mates, not tested for PrPd.
Percentage frequencies of polymorphisms in the caprine Prnp open reading frame in UK farms.
| Herd | A$ | B$ | C | D | E$ | F | G | H | I | X | J$ | K | L | M | P | Q | R | S | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 323 | 188 | 20 | 39 | 91 | 35 | 23 | 29 | 48 | 41 | 97 | 29 | 22 | 35 | 103 | 21 | 29 | 12 | 10 | |
| 62.9 | 50.8 | 50 | 60.2 | 59.3 | 57.1 | 76.2 | 96.6 | 61.5 | 75.7 | 63.4 | 96.6 | 95.5 | 75.7 | 52.4 | 57.1 | 69 | 16.7 | 100 | |
| - | 0.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 5.3 | 25.5 | 10 | - | 3.3 | 4.3 | 4.3 | - | - | 2.4 | 3.1 | - | - | - | - | 2.4 | - | - | - | |
| 29.1 | 23.2 | 32.5 | 37.2 | 33 | 27.1 | 15.2 | - | 37.5 | 19.5 | 20.8 | 1.7 | - | 1.4 | 19.4 | 2.4 | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3.4 | - | - | - | 1.7 | 4.5 | 8.6 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 12 | - | - | |
| - | - | 7.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4.1 | - | - | 4.3 | 23.3 | 33.3 | 19 | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.4 | 0.5 | - | - | - | - | |
| 1.9 | - | - | 1.3 | 3.3 | 8.6 | 4.3 | - | 1 | 2.4 | 6.8 | - | - | - | - | 2.4 | - | 50 | - | |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8.6 | 1.5 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 0.8 | - | - | 1.3 | 1.1 | 2.9 | - | - | - | - | 1.6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 33.3 | - | |
Breeds: A = Alpine, Ag = Angora, B = Boer, C = Cashmere, GG = Golden Guernsey, N = Anglo-Nubian, S = Saanen, T = Toggenburg, F = Feral; number = number of animals, for calculation of allele frequency this is doubled to get number of chromosomes. For codon 101 only 2350 chromosomes were recorded and for codon 127 only 2362. X represents five farms each ≤ 12 animals. $scrapie-affected herds.
UK mean Prnp polymorphism frequencies [%] and comparison with frequencies from other countries.
| Country | UK | Mexico | France1 | Italy2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 932 | 157 | 84 | 1195 | 166 | 404 | 478 | |
| 61.8 | 56.1 | 89.2 | 62.7 | 62 | 66.4 | 67.8 | |
| 0.1 | - | - | 0.1 | - | - | - | |
| 8.2 | 0.3 | - | 6.4 | - | 5.8 | 1.8 | |
| 26.6 | 13.2 | 1.2 | 22.6 | 14.5 | 6.1 | 8.4 | |
| 0.1 | 4.5 | 5.4 | 1.0 | 0.3 | - | 1.3 | |
| 0.2 | 24.5 | - | 3.6 | 5.4 | - | - | |
| - | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 5.3 | |
| - | - | - | - | 3 | - | 0.4 | |
| - | - | - | - | 1.5 | - | - | |
| 2.3 | 0.3 | - | 2.3 | 10 | 12.2 | 7.4 | |
| - | 0.7 | 3.6 | 0.4 | - | - | - | |
| 0.7 | - | - | 0.9 | - | 6.3 | 7.6 | |
References 1[14]2[26]. See also table 3.