Literature DB >> 22040182

Sensitivity of protein adsorption to architectural variations in a protein-resistant polymer brush containing engineered nanoscale adhesive sites.

Saugata Gon1, Maria M Santore.   

Abstract

Patchy polymer brushes contain nanoscale (5-15 nm) adhesive elements, such as polymer coils or nanoparticles, embedded at their base at random positions on the surface. The competition between the brush's steric (protein resistant) repulsions and the attractions from the discrete adhesive elements provides a precise means to control bioadhesion. This differs from the classical approach, where functionality is placed on the brush's periphery. The current study demonstrates the impact of poly(etheylene glycol) (PEG) brush architecture and ionic strength on fibrinogen adsorption on brushes containing embedded poly-l-lysine (PLL, 20K MW) coils or "patches". The consistent appearance of a fibrinogen adsorption threshold, a minimum loading of patches on the surface, below which protein adsorption does not occur, suggests multivalent protein capture: Adsorbing proteins simultaneously engage several patches. The surface composition (patch loading) at the threshold is extremely sensitive to the brush height and ionic strength, varying up to a factor of 5 in the surface loading of the PLL patches (~50% of the range of possible surfaces). Variations in ionic strength have a similar effect, with the smallest thresholds seen for the largest Debye lengths. While trends with brush height were the clearest and most dominant, consideration of the PEG loading within the brush or its persistence length did not reveal a critical brush parameter for the onset of adsorption. The lack of straightforward correlation on brush physics was likely a result of multivalent binding, (producing an additional dependence on patch loading), and might be resolved for univalent adsorption onto more strongly binding patches. While studies with similar brushes placed uniformly on a surface revealed that the PEG loading within the brush is the best indicator of protein resistance, the current results suggest that brush height is more important for patchy brushes. Likely the interactions producing brush extension normal to the interface act similarly to drive lateral tether extension to obstruct patches.
© 2011 American Chemical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22040182     DOI: 10.1021/la203293k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langmuir        ISSN: 0743-7463            Impact factor:   3.882


  6 in total

1.  Stimuli Response of Cationic Polymer Brush Prepared by ATRP: Application in Peptide Fractionation.

Authors:  Colleen Scott; Bojan Mitrovic; Stephanie Eastwood; Gary Kinsel
Journal:  Polymer (Guildf)       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.430

2.  Surfaces that Adhesively Discriminate Breast Epithelial Cell Lines and Lymphocytes in Buffer and Human Breast Milk.

Authors:  S Kalasin; E P Browne; K F Arcaro; M M Santore
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 9.229

3.  How Bacteria Adhere to Brushy PEG Surfaces: Clinging to Flaws and Compressing the Brush.

Authors:  S Gon; Kushi-Nidhi Kumar; Klaus Nüsslein; Maria M Santore
Journal:  Macromolecules       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 5.985

Review 4.  Molecular approaches to chromatography using single molecule spectroscopy.

Authors:  Lydia Kisley; Christy F Landes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 5.  Closing the gap: accelerating the translational process in nanomedicine by proposing standardized characterization techniques.

Authors:  Ali A Khorasani; James L Weaver; Carolina Salvador-Morales
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-12-08

6.  Novel design of (PEG-ylated)PAMAM-based nanoparticles for sustained delivery of BDNF to neurotoxin-injured differentiated neuroblastoma cells.

Authors:  Maria Dąbkowska; Karolina Łuczkowska; Dorota Rogińska; Anna Sobuś; Monika Wasilewska; Zofia Ulańczyk; Bogusław Machaliński
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 10.435

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.