Literature DB >> 22039915

Analysis of abstracts presented at the prosthodontic research section of IADR General Sessions 2004-2005: demographics, publication rates, and factors contributing to publication.

Damian J Lee1, Judy Chia-Chun Yuan, Soni Prasad, Valentim Adelino Ricardo Barão, Nodesh Shyamsunder, Cortino Sukotjo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to describe the demographics of abstracts presented at the prosthodontics section of IADR General Sessions from 2004 to 2005, evaluate the publication rate of abstracts, and analyze the relationship between variables in abstracts and publication.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prosthodontics research section abstracts from the IADR General Session in 2004 and 2005 were evaluated for: number of authors, presentation type, origin, affiliation, topic, study design, statistics, study outcome, and funding. The publication rate was calculated following a PubMed search. The journal of publication, year of publication, and the length of time before publication were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used for the data analysis; the relationships between presentation type, study design, study outcome, statistics, funding, and publication were analyzed using logistic regression (α= 0.05).
RESULTS: From 346 abstracts, 37.0% were published. For oral presentations, 40.7% were published; 35.8% of poster presentations were published. The mean duration before publication was 26.4 months. North America had the most abstracts, and Europe had the most publications. Fixed prosthodontic research had the highest number and proportion for publication. A significant association with publication was noted for neutral study outcomes (p= 0.018), studies with funding (p= 0.035), and abstracts from Europe (p= 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of abstracts from the prosthodontics research section of IADR General Sessions from 2004 and 2005 remain unpublished. A significant association for publication was noted with neutral outcomes, funding, and abstracts from Europe.
© 2011 by the American College of Prosthodontists.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22039915     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00792.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont        ISSN: 1059-941X            Impact factor:   2.752


  5 in total

1.  Discrepancies between Abstracts Presented at International Association for Dental Research Annual Sessions from 2004 to 2005 and Full-Text Publication.

Authors:  Soni Prasad; Damian J Lee; Judy Chia-Chun Yuan; Valentim A R Barao; Nodesh Shyamsunder; Cortino Sukotjo
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-02-22

2.  Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts.

Authors:  Roberta W Scherer; Joerg J Meerpohl; Nadine Pfeifer; Christine Schmucker; Guido Schwarzer; Erik von Elm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-20

3.  What is the fate of scientific abstracts? The publication rates of abstracts presented at the 7th National Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Authors:  Gülçin Şahin Ersoy; Deniz Öztekin; Ayşe Gül Kebapçılar; Tutku Gürbüz
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-03-15

4.  A descriptive analysis of abstracts presented at the Turkish National Cardiology Congresses between 2011 and 2015.

Authors:  Veysel Oktay; İlknur Çalpar Çıralı; Ebru Serin; Vedat Sansoy
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.596

5.  Analysis of conference abstracts of prosthodontic randomised-controlled trials presented at IADR general sessions (2002-2015): a cross-sectional study of the relationship between demographic characteristics, reporting quality and final publication.

Authors:  Junsheng Chen; Yubin Cao; Meijie Wang; Xueqi Gan; Chunjie Li; Haiyang Yu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.