| Literature DB >> 22039411 |
Ming-Yen Lin1, Mei-Chin Chen, I-Chen Wu, Deng-Chyang Wu, Yu-Jen Cheng, Chun-Chieh Wu, Chee-Yin Chai, Jang-Ming Lee, Ming-Tsang Wu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Whether the habitual use of substances (tobacco, alcohol, or areca nut (seed of the Areca palm)) can affect the age of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) presentation has rarely been examined.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22039411 PMCID: PMC3198438 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025347
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Relationship of substance uses with diagnosed age of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
| Variables | Number | Mean ± SD | Median (IQR) |
| β (95% CI) |
|
| Overall | 668 | 59.2±11.3 | 59 (67, 50) | |||
| Alcohol drinking | ||||||
| No | 125 | 63.9±11.8 | 65 (55, 73) | <0.0001 | - | 0.002 |
| Yes | 543 | 58.1±10.9 | 58 (50, 66) | −3.58 (−5.86, −1.30) | ||
| Age at starting drinking | ||||||
| ≥20 yrs | 430 | 58.7±10.8 | 59 (50, 66) | 0.005 | - | 0.07 |
| <20 yrs | 113 | 55.9±11.1 | 55 (48, 63) | −1.39 (−2.90, 0.12) | ||
| Daily average | ||||||
| <3 drinks/day | 144 | 59.9±11.2 | 60 (52, 68) | 0.02 | - | 0.02 |
| ≥3 drinks/day | 399 | 57.4±10.7 | 57 (49, 65) | −2.54 (−0.48, −4.61) | ||
| Cigarette smoking | ||||||
| No | 88 | 61.4±11.5 | 60 (53, 70) | 0.05 | - | 0.10 |
| Yes | 580 | 58.8±11.2 | 59 (50, 67) | 2.20 (−0.42, 4.82) | ||
| Age at starting smoking | ||||||
| ≥20 yrs | 356 | 61.2±10.7 | 62 (53, 68) | <0.0001 | - | 0.13 |
| <20 yrs | 224 | 55.0±11.0 | 54 (47, 62) | −1.08 (−2.46, 0.31) | ||
| Daily average | ||||||
| <20 cigarettes/day | 420 | 57.5±10.0 | 57 (50, 64) | 0.07 | - | 0.11 |
| ≥20 cigarettes/day | 160 | 59.3±11.7 | 60 (50, 68) | −1.64 (−3.68, 0.40) | ||
| Areca chewing | <0.0001 | |||||
| No | 370 | 62.3±11.8 | 64 (54, 71) | - | <0.0001 | |
| Yes | 298 | 55.3±9.2 | 55 (48, 62) | −6.34 (−7.98, −4.70) | ||
| Age at starting chewing | ||||||
| ≥20 yrs | 235 | 56.2±8.9 | 56 (49, 63) | 0.0002 | - | <0.0001 |
| <20 yrs | 63 | 51.5±9.5 | 51 (44, 58) | −4.51 (−3.23, −5.78) | ||
| Daily average | ||||||
| <20 betel nuts/day | 213 | 55.2±9.5 | 54 (48, 61) | 0.79 | - | 0.78 |
| ≥20 betel nuts/day | 85 | 55.5±8.6 | 56 (49, 62) | 0.34 (−2.03, 2.71) |
Abbreviations: IQR: Interquartile range; CI: Confidence interval; KMUH: Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital; KVGH: Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital; NTUH: National Taiwan University Hospital.
Adjusting for educational levels (>high school vs.
Compared to ≥20 year of age starting to smoking, drinking or chewing.
Compared to <3 drinks/day in alcohol drinking, <20 cigarettes/day in cigarette smoking, or <20 betel nuts/day in areca chewing.
Association between number of substance uses and diagnosed age of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
| Alcohol | Tobacco | Areca | n | Mean ± SD | Median (IQR) | β (95% CI) |
| Adjusted β |
|
| ≤1 substance use | 121 | 65.2±11.5 | 67 (56, 75) | - | - | - | - | ||
| + | + | − | 249 | 60.9±11.7 | 63 (52, 69) | −4.29 (−1.97, −6.61) | <0.0001 | −3.45 (−1.25, −5.66) | 0.002 |
| + | − | + | 11 | 54.5±8.6 | 57 (48, 60) | −10.65 (−4.06, −17.25) | 0.002 | −8.07 (−1.80, −14.33) | 0.01 |
| − | + | + | 23 | 56.6±9.9 | 55 (48, 63) | −8.59 (−3.83, −13.35) | <0.0001 | −7.78 (−3.21, −12.34) | 0.001 |
| + | + | + | 264 | 55.2±9.2 | 55 (48, 61) | −10.03 (−7.73, −12.33) | <0.0001 | −9.20 (−7.00, −11.39) | <0.0001 |
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; CI, confidence interval.
Adjusting for education levels, study hospitals and clinical stage.
Association between number of substances used and the diagnosing age of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma categorized by clinical stages.
| Alcohol | Tobacco | Areca | n | Mean ± SD | Median (IQR) | β (95% CI) |
| Adjusted β |
|
| Clinical stageEarly stage (I and II, n = 232) | |||||||||
| ≤1 substance use | 51 | 65.0±10.8 | 66 (56, 75) | - | - | - | - | ||
| + | + | − | 86 | 60.6±11.0 | 62 (52, 68) | −4.40 (−8.02, −0.79) | 0.02 | −3.28 (−6.84, 0.29) | 0.07 |
| + | − | + | 3 | 57.0±11.5 | 53 (48, 70) | −8.02 (−20.18, 4.14) | 0.20 | −8.16 (−19.87, 3.55) | 0.17 |
| − | + | + | 9 | 57.1±10.8 | 63 (48, 65) | −7.91 (−15.31, −0.51) | 0.04 | −7.44 (−14.76, −0.12) | 0.05 |
| + | + | + | 83 | 56.4±9.3 | 55 (50, 63) | −8.63 (−12.28, −4.99) | <0.0001 | −7.65 (−11.21, −4.09) | <0.0001 |
| Late stage (III and IV, n = 436) | |||||||||
| ≤1 substance use | 70 | 65.3±12.1 | 68 (56, 74) | - | - | - | - | ||
| + | + | − | 163 | 61.1±12.1 | 63 (52, 69) | −4.27 (−7.31, −1.22) | 0.006 | −3.95 (−6.79, −1.12) | 0.006 |
| + | − | + | 8 | 53.6±8.0 | 57 (48, 60) | −11.70 (−19.66, −3.75) | 0.004 | −7.85 (−15.31, −0.38) | 0.04 |
| − | + | + | 14 | 56.3±9.8 | 55 (48, 63) | −9.04 (−15.29, −2.80) | 0.005 | −8.43 (−14.28, −2.58) | 0.005 |
| + | + | + | 181 | 54.6±9.2 | 55 (48, 61) | −10.72 (−13.72, −7.72) | <0.0001 | −10.19 (−13.00, −7.38) | <0.0001 |
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; CI, confidence interval.
Adjusting for education levels and study hospitals (NTUH vs. KMUH and KVGH).