Literature DB >> 22039305

Affinity thresholds for naive CD8+ CTL activation by peptides and engineered influenza A viruses.

Alice E Denton1, Robb Wesselingh, Stephanie Gras, Carole Guillonneau, Matthew R Olson, Justine D Mintern, Weiguang Zeng, David C Jackson, Jamie Rossjohn, Philip D Hodgkin, Peter C Doherty, Stephen J Turner.   

Abstract

High-avidity interactions between TCRs and peptide + class I MHC (pMHCI) epitopes drive CTL activation and expansion. Intriguing questions remain concerning the constraints determining optimal TCR/pMHCI binding. The present analysis uses the TCR transgenic OT-I model to assess how varying profiles of TCR/pMHCI avidity influence naive CTL proliferation and the acquisition of effector function following exposure to the cognate H-2K(b)/OVA(257-264) (SIINFEKL) epitope and to mutants provided as peptide or in engineered influenza A viruses. Stimulating naive OT-I CD8(+) T cells in vitro with SIINFEKL induced full CTL proliferation and differentiation that was largely independent of any need for costimulation. By contrast, in vitro activation with the low-affinity EIINFEKL or SIIGFEKL ligands depended on the provision of IL-2 and other costimulatory signals. Importantly, although they did generate potent endogenous responses, infection of mice with influenza A viruses expressing these same OVA(257) variants failed to induce the activation of adoptively transferred naive OT-I CTLps, an effect that was only partially overcome by priming with a lipopeptide vaccine. Subsequent structural and biophysical analysis of H2-K(b)OVA(257), H2-K(b)E1, and H2-K(b)G4 established that these variations introduce small changes at the pMHCI interface and decrease epitope stability in ways that would likely impact cell surface presentation and recognition. Overall, it seems that there is an activation threshold for naive CTLps, that minimal alterations in peptide sequence can have profound effects, and that the antigenic requirements for the in vitro and in vivo induction of CTL proliferation and effector function differ substantially.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22039305     DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  27 in total

1.  TCRβ repertoire of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells is distinct in richness, distribution, and CDR3 amino acid composition.

Authors:  Hoi Ming Li; Toyoko Hiroi; Yongqing Zhang; Alvin Shi; Guobing Chen; Supriyo De; E Jeffrey Metter; William H Wood; Alexei Sharov; Joshua D Milner; Kevin G Becker; Ming Zhan; Nan-ping Weng
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.962

2.  Vaccine Adjuvant Incorporation Strategy Dictates Peptide Amphiphile Micelle Immunostimulatory Capacity.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Jake S Kramer; Josiah D Smith; Brittany N Allen; Caitlin N Leeper; Xiaolei Li; Logan D Morton; Fabio Gallazzi; Bret D Ulery
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Antigen expression level threshold tunes the fate of CD8 T cells during primary hepatic immune responses.

Authors:  Szun Szun Tay; Yik Chun Wong; David M McDonald; Nicole A W Wood; Ben Roediger; Frederic Sierro; Claire Mcguffog; Ian E Alexander; G Alex Bishop; Jennifer R Gamble; Wolfgang Weninger; Geoffrey W McCaughan; Patrick Bertolino; David G Bowen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Mini-intronic plasmid vaccination elicits tolerant LAG3+ CD8+ T cells and inferior antitumor responses.

Authors:  Viswa Teja Colluru; Christopher D Zahm; Douglas G McNeel
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 8.110

5.  Predicting immunogenic tumour mutations by combining mass spectrometry and exome sequencing.

Authors:  Mahesh Yadav; Suchit Jhunjhunwala; Qui T Phung; Patrick Lupardus; Joshua Tanguay; Stephanie Bumbaca; Christian Franci; Tommy K Cheung; Jens Fritsche; Toni Weinschenk; Zora Modrusan; Ira Mellman; Jennie R Lill; Lélia Delamarre
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Interferon regulatory factor 4 sustains CD8(+) T cell expansion and effector differentiation.

Authors:  Shuyu Yao; Bruno Fernando Buzo; Duy Pham; Li Jiang; Elizabeth J Taparowsky; Mark H Kaplan; Jie Sun
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 31.745

7.  Antigen-specific inhibition of high-avidity T cell target lysis by low-avidity T cells via trogocytosis.

Authors:  Brile Chung; Tor B Stuge; John P Murad; Georg Beilhack; Emily Andersen; Brian D Armstrong; Jeffrey S Weber; Peter P Lee
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  Stimulation strength controls the rate of initiation but not the molecular organisation of TCR-induced signalling.

Authors:  John C Marioni; Gillian M Griffiths; Arianne C Richard; Claire Y Ma
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Fibroblastic reticular cells of the lymph node are required for retention of resting but not activated CD8+ T cells.

Authors:  Alice E Denton; Edward W Roberts; Michelle A Linterman; Douglas T Fearon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  FcγR engagement reprograms neutrophils into antigen cross-presenting cells that elicit acquired anti-tumor immunity.

Authors:  Koshu Okubo; Pei X Liew; Vijayashree Mysore; Xavier Cullere; Joseph Mears; Florencia Rosetti; Fan Zhang; Iris Madera-Salcedo; Frank Rosenbauer; Richard M Stone; Jon C Aster; Ulrich H von Andrian; Andrew H Lichtman; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Tanya N Mayadas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.