PURPOSE: To evaluate new grading criteria for geographic atrophy (GA), as detected by annual stereoscopic color fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms, and to assess whether application of the revised criteria provides earlier identification of GA than previous criteria involving only color fundus photography. METHODS: Annual fundus image sets from 114 CAPT patients who developed GA in the untreated eye during 5 to 6 years of follow-up were reassessed for the presence of GA, using revised grading criteria, in which GA was defined by (1) the presence of hyperfluorescence on fluorescein angiography; and (2) at least one other characteristic indicative of involution of the retinal pigment epithelium (i.e., sharp edges, excavation of the retina, or visible choroidal vessels on either color images or fluorescein angiograms). Reliability and time of initial detection of GA using the revised criteria were assessed. RESULTS: The revised criteria are reliable (97.8% intragrader, 93.3% intergrader agreement) and accurate (false-positive rate, 0.8%) for detecting individual early GA lesions. Using this revised method, individual GA lesions were identified 1-year earlier on average than was possible with criteria used in previous CFP studies. The use of two imaging modalities was more sensitive in detecting GA and its features than either imaging modality alone (P ≤ 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Early GA areas can be reliably identified when defining criteria are based on both color photographs and fluorescein angiograms. These methods can be used to investigate the natural history of GA earlier in the course of disease than previously possible and to facilitate the design of future clinical trials of treatments for GA. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00000167).
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate new grading criteria for geographic atrophy (GA), as detected by annual stereoscopic color fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms, and to assess whether application of the revised criteria provides earlier identification of GA than previous criteria involving only color fundus photography. METHODS: Annual fundus image sets from 114 CAPT patients who developed GA in the untreated eye during 5 to 6 years of follow-up were reassessed for the presence of GA, using revised grading criteria, in which GA was defined by (1) the presence of hyperfluorescence on fluorescein angiography; and (2) at least one other characteristic indicative of involution of the retinal pigment epithelium (i.e., sharp edges, excavation of the retina, or visible choroidal vessels on either color images or fluorescein angiograms). Reliability and time of initial detection of GA using the revised criteria were assessed. RESULTS: The revised criteria are reliable (97.8% intragrader, 93.3% intergrader agreement) and accurate (false-positive rate, 0.8%) for detecting individual early GA lesions. Using this revised method, individual GA lesions were identified 1-year earlier on average than was possible with criteria used in previous CFP studies. The use of two imaging modalities was more sensitive in detecting GA and its features than either imaging modality alone (P ≤ 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Early GA areas can be reliably identified when defining criteria are based on both color photographs and fluorescein angiograms. These methods can be used to investigate the natural history of GA earlier in the course of disease than previously possible and to facilitate the design of future clinical trials of treatments for GA. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00000167).
Authors: Janet S Sunness; Eyal Margalit; Divya Srikumaran; Carol A Applegate; Yan Tian; Daniel Perry; Barbara S Hawkins; Neil M Bressler Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Frank G Holz; Almut Bindewald-Wittich; Monika Fleckenstein; Jens Dreyhaupt; Hendrik P N Scholl; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2006-12-22 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Michael L Klein; Frederick L Ferris; Jane Armstrong; Thomas S Hwang; Emily Y Chew; Susan B Bressler; Suresh R Chandra Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-11-05 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Srilaxmi Bearelly; Felix Y Chau; Anjum Koreishi; Sandra S Stinnett; Joseph A Izatt; Cynthia A Toth Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2009-07-29 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ute E K Wolf-Schnurrbusch; Volker Enzmann; Christian K Brinkmann; Sebastian Wolf Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-03-31 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Monika Fleckenstein; Christine Adrion; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Arno P Göbel; Almut Bindewald-Wittich; Hendrik P N Scholl; Ulrich Mansmann; Frank G Holz Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-09-24 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Manpreet Brar; Igor Kozak; Lingyun Cheng; Dirk-Uwe G Bartsch; Ritchie Yuson; Nitin Nigam; Stephen F Oster; Francesca Mojana; William R Freeman Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-07-09 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Dae Yu Kim; Jeff Fingler; Robert J Zawadzki; Susanna S Park; Lawrence S Morse; Daniel M Schwartz; Scott E Fraser; John S Werner Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-08-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: SriniVas R Sadda; Usha Chakravarthy; David G Birch; Giovanni Staurenghi; Erin C Henry; Christopher Brittain Journal: Retina Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Juan E Grunwald; Ebenezer Daniel; Jiayan Huang; Gui-Shuang Ying; Maureen G Maguire; Cynthia A Toth; Glenn J Jaffe; Stuart L Fine; Barbara Blodi; Michael L Klein; Alison A Martin; Stephanie A Hagstrom; Daniel F Martin Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-09-29 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Francesco Bandello; Riccardo Sacconi; Lea Querques; Eleonora Corbelli; Maria Vittoria Cicinelli; Giuseppe Querques Journal: F1000Res Date: 2017-03-09