BACKGROUND: The System for Observing Play and Leisure Activities (SOPLAY) is a direct observation instrument designed to assess group physical activity and environmental contexts. The purpose of this study was to test the convergent validity of the SOPLAY using temporally matched data from an accelerometry-based activity monitor. METHODS: Accelerometry-based physical activity data were obtained from 160 elementary school children from 9 after-school activity programs. SOPLAY coding was used to directly observe physical activity during these sessions. Analyses evaluated agreement between the monitored and observed physical activity behavior by comparing the percent of youth engaging in physical activity with the 2 assessments. RESULTS: Agreement varied widely depending on the way the SOPLAY codes were interpreted. Estimates from SOPLAY were significantly higher than accelerometer PA levels when codes of walking and vigorous were used (in combination) to reflect participation in moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA). Estimates were similar when only SOPLAY codes of vigorous were used to define MVPA (Difference = 1.33 ± 22.06%). CONCLUSIONS: SOPLAY codes of walking corresponded well with estimates of Light intensity PA. Observations provide valid indicators of MVPA if coding is based on the percentage of youth classified as "vigorous."
BACKGROUND: The System for Observing Play and Leisure Activities (SOPLAY) is a direct observation instrument designed to assess group physical activity and environmental contexts. The purpose of this study was to test the convergent validity of the SOPLAY using temporally matched data from an accelerometry-based activity monitor. METHODS: Accelerometry-based physical activity data were obtained from 160 elementary school children from 9 after-school activity programs. SOPLAY coding was used to directly observe physical activity during these sessions. Analyses evaluated agreement between the monitored and observed physical activity behavior by comparing the percent of youth engaging in physical activity with the 2 assessments. RESULTS: Agreement varied widely depending on the way the SOPLAY codes were interpreted. Estimates from SOPLAY were significantly higher than accelerometer PA levels when codes of walking and vigorous were used (in combination) to reflect participation in moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA). Estimates were similar when only SOPLAY codes of vigorous were used to define MVPA (Difference = 1.33 ± 22.06%). CONCLUSIONS: SOPLAY codes of walking corresponded well with estimates of Light intensity PA. Observations provide valid indicators of MVPA if coding is based on the percentage of youth classified as "vigorous."
Authors: Camelia R Singletary; Glenn Weaver; Russell L Carson; Michael W Beets; Russell R Pate; Ruth P Saunders; Alexandra G Peluso; Justin B Moore Journal: Eval Program Plann Date: 2019-05-02
Authors: Keith Brazendale; Jessica L Chandler; Michael W Beets; Robert G Weaver; Aaron Beighle; Jennifer L Huberty; Justin B Moore Journal: Prev Med Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Marie C Ferguson; Matthew J Morgan; Kelly J O'Shea; Lucas Winch; Sheryl S Siegmund; Mario Solano Gonzales; Samuel Randall; Daniel L Hertenstein; Valerie Montague; Ayanna Woodberry; Trish Cassatt; Bruce Y Lee Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Rebekka M Lee; Karen M Emmons; Cassandra A Okechukwu; Jessica L Barrett; Erica L Kenney; Angie L Cradock; Catherine M Giles; Madeleine E deBlois; Steven L Gortmaker Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 6.457