BACKGROUND: We studied the stellate ganglion block (SGB) recently suggested for the treatment of severe vasomotor symptoms and sleep disturbances in breast cancer survivors. Following an initial pilot study, which focused on the acceptability and safety of SGB for this important problem, we evaluated its short- and long-term efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Postmenopausal breast cancer survivors with severe vasomotor symptoms resistant to standard nonhormonal pharmacological intervention were eligible. Diaries were used to measure daily hot flash scores (frequency and intensity) and sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) during scheduled visits at baseline, 1, 4, 12 and 24 weeks following the SGB. Efficacy data were analyzed using longitudinal regression models. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients participated and none refused the SGB procedure. Most patients received more than one SGB. The pilot study found SGB to be safe. In the main study, hot flash scores were reduced from baseline by 64% [95% confidence interval (CI) -74% to -49%] and 47% (95% CI -62% to -27%) at weeks 1 and 24, respectively. The odds ratio of better sleep quality relative to baseline was 3.4 at week 1 (95% CI 1.6-7.2) and 4.3 at week 24 (95% CI 1.9-9.8). CONCLUSION: In the short term, SGB appears to be an effective treatment with acceptable morbidity for some breast cancer survivors with therapy-resistant vasomotor symptoms and/or sleep disturbances. Although sleep quality was maintained out to 24 weeks the efficacy of SGB for hot flashes was reduced over time. A randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm these findings.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We studied the stellate ganglion block (SGB) recently suggested for the treatment of severe vasomotor symptoms and sleep disturbances in breast cancer survivors. Following an initial pilot study, which focused on the acceptability and safety of SGB for this important problem, we evaluated its short- and long-term efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal breast cancer survivors with severe vasomotor symptoms resistant to standard nonhormonal pharmacological intervention were eligible. Diaries were used to measure daily hot flash scores (frequency and intensity) and sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) during scheduled visits at baseline, 1, 4, 12 and 24 weeks following the SGB. Efficacy data were analyzed using longitudinal regression models. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients participated and none refused the SGB procedure. Most patients received more than one SGB. The pilot study found SGB to be safe. In the main study, hot flash scores were reduced from baseline by 64% [95% confidence interval (CI) -74% to -49%] and 47% (95% CI -62% to -27%) at weeks 1 and 24, respectively. The odds ratio of better sleep quality relative to baseline was 3.4 at week 1 (95% CI 1.6-7.2) and 4.3 at week 24 (95% CI 1.9-9.8). CONCLUSION: In the short term, SGB appears to be an effective treatment with acceptable morbidity for some breast cancer survivors with therapy-resistant vasomotor symptoms and/or sleep disturbances. Although sleep quality was maintained out to 24 weeks the efficacy of SGB for hot flashes was reduced over time. A randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm these findings.
Authors: Pauline M Maki; Leah H Rubin; Antonia Savarese; Lauren Drogos; Lee P Shulman; Suzanne Banuvar; David R Walega Journal: Maturitas Date: 2016-07-17 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: William I Fisher; Aimee K Johnson; Gary R Elkins; Julie L Otte; Debra S Burns; Menggang Yu; Janet S Carpenter Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Vasudha Goel; Amol M Patwardhan; Mohab Ibrahim; Carol L Howe; David M Schultz; Hariharan Shankar Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2019-04-16 Impact factor: 5.564
Authors: Julie L Otte; Janet S Carpenter; Shalini Manchanda; Kevin L Rand; Todd C Skaar; Michael Weaver; Yelena Chernyak; Xin Zhong; Christele Igega; Carol Landis Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2014-11-30 Impact factor: 4.452