AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the effect of hypopressive exercises including pelvic floor muscle contraction, pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) alone and control on pelvic floor muscle function in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS:Fifty-eight women with a mean age of 55.4 (± 9.8) years old withstage II POP were randomly assigned to participate in the PFMT group, the hypopressive exercises associated with PFMT (HE + PFMT) group or the control group. Each treatment group underwent a 3-month course of treatment. The three groups received lifestyle advice regarding weight loss, constipation, coughing, and the avoidance of heavy lifting. Participants were evaluated before and after the treatment. Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and endurance were assessed using the Modified Oxford grading system. To evaluate muscle activation, surface electromyography (SEMG) was used. RESULTS: The two treatment group significantly increase pelvic floor muscle function as measured by MVC (P < 0.001) using the Modified Oxford grading system, as well as muscle activation (P < 0.001), measured by SEMG. The PFMT group was superior regarding endurance (P = 0.007). Both groups were superior to the control group regarding MVC, endurance and muscle activation. CONCLUSION: Adding hypopressive exercises to PFMT does not improve PFM function. Both treatment groups performed better than the control group.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the effect of hypopressive exercises including pelvic floor muscle contraction, pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) alone and control on pelvic floor muscle function in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: Fifty-eight women with a mean age of 55.4 (± 9.8) years old with stage II POP were randomly assigned to participate in the PFMT group, the hypopressive exercises associated with PFMT (HE + PFMT) group or the control group. Each treatment group underwent a 3-month course of treatment. The three groups received lifestyle advice regarding weight loss, constipation, coughing, and the avoidance of heavy lifting. Participants were evaluated before and after the treatment. Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and endurance were assessed using the Modified Oxford grading system. To evaluate muscle activation, surface electromyography (SEMG) was used. RESULTS: The two treatment group significantly increase pelvic floor muscle function as measured by MVC (P < 0.001) using the Modified Oxford grading system, as well as muscle activation (P < 0.001), measured by SEMG. The PFMT group was superior regarding endurance (P = 0.007). Both groups were superior to the control group regarding MVC, endurance and muscle activation. CONCLUSION: Adding hypopressive exercises to PFMT does not improve PFM function. Both treatment groups performed better than the control group.
Authors: Magdalena Piernicka; Monika Błudnicka; Damian Bojar; Jakub Kortas; Anna Szumilewicz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Daniel Santa Mina; Darren Au; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Leah Jamnicky; Nelly Faghani; William J Hilton; Leslie E Stefanyk; Paul Ritvo; Jennifer Jones; Dean Elterman; Neil E Fleshner; Antonio Finelli; Rajiv K Singal; John Trachtenberg; Andrew G Matthew Journal: BMC Urol Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 2.264
Authors: Beatriz Navarro-Brazález; Virginia Prieto-Gómez; David Prieto-Merino; Beatriz Sánchez-Sánchez; Linda McLean; María Torres-Lacomba Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-04-17 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Iria Da Cuña-Carrera; Alejandra Alonso-Calvete; Eva M Lantarón-Caeiro; Mercedes Soto-González Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 3.390