| Literature DB >> 22038744 |
Jonathan D Adachi1, Kenneth Lyles, Steven Boonen, Cathleen Colón-Emeric, Lars Hyldstrup, Lars Nordsletten, Carl Pieper, Chris Recknor, Guoqin Su, Christina Bucci-Rechtweg, Jay Magaziner.
Abstract
Our purpose was to characterize the risks of osteoporosis-related subtrochanteric fractures in bisphosphonate-naive individuals. Baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the HORIZON-Recurrent Fracture Trial with a study-qualifying hip fracture were examined, comparing those who sustained incident subtrochanteric fractures with those sustaining other hip fractures. Subjects were bisphosphonate-naive or had a bisphosphonate washout period of 6-24 months and subsequently received an annual infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg or placebo after low-trauma hip-fracture repair. In total, 2,127 men and women were included. Of the qualifying hip fractures, 5.2% were subtrochanteric, 54.8% femoral neck, 33.0% intertrochanteric, and 7.1% other (generally complex fractures of mixed type). Significant baseline (pre-hip fracture) differences were seen between index hip-fracture types, with the percentage of patients with extreme mobility problems being twofold higher in patients with index subtrochanteric fracture (9.9%) compared to other patients. The distribution of hip-fracture types was similar between the treatment groups at baseline. No patients with index subtrochanteric fractures and six patients with other qualifying hip fractures reported prior bisphosphonate use. Only one further subtrochanteric fracture occurred in each treatment group over an average 2-year patient follow-up. Subtrochanteric fractures are not uncommon in bisphosphonate-naive patients. Extreme difficulties with mobility may be a unique risk factor predisposing to development of incident subtrochanteric fractures rather than other types of hip fracture. In patients with recent hip fracture who received zoledronic acid therapy, the incidence of new subtrochanteric fractures was too small to draw any meaningful conclusions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22038744 PMCID: PMC3215881 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-011-9543-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Calcif Tissue Int ISSN: 0171-967X Impact factor: 4.333
Location of qualifying hip fracture
| Location of qualifying hip fracture | Zoledronic acid ( | Placebo ( |
|---|---|---|
| Intertrochanteric | 358 (33.6) | 344 (32.4) |
| Subtrochanteric | 50 (4.7) | 56 (5.3) |
| Subcapital | 220 (20.7) | 213 (20.1) |
| Femoral neck | 357 (33.5) | 374 (35.2) |
| Other | 78 (7.3) | 75 (7.1) |
| Missing | 2 (0.2) | 0 (0.0) |
Baseline (pre-hip fracture) characteristics (ITT population)
| Subtrochanteric hip fracture ( | Other hip fracture ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | |||
| Mean (SD) | 73.9 (9.26) | 74.5 (9.69) | 0.51 |
| Group, | 0.51 | ||
| <65 | 21 (19.8) | 343 (17.0) | |
| 65–74 | 27 (25.5) | 549 (27.2) | |
| 75–84 | 48 (45.3) | 847 (41.9) | |
| ≥85 | 10 (9.4) | 282 (14.0) | |
| Sex, | 0.27 | ||
| Male | 30 (28.3) | 478 (23.7) | |
| Female | 76 (71.7) | 1543 (76.3) | |
| BMI, mean (SD) | 24.6 (4.20) | 24.8 (4.44) | 0.74 |
| Bone mineral density, (g/cm2) | |||
| Femoral neck, mean (SD) | 0.654 (0.1235) | 0.649 (0.1245) | 0.74 |
| Total hip, mean (SD) | 0.709 (0.1846) | 0.697 (0.1509) | 0.47 |
| T score at femoral neck, | 0.71 | ||
| ≤−2.5 | 48 (45.3) | 840 (41.6) | |
| >−2.5 to ≤−1.5 | 39 (36.8) | 696 (34.4) | |
| >−1.5 | 10 (9.4) | 234 (11.6) | |
| Missing | 9 (8.5) | 251 (12.4) | |
| Prior bisphosphonate use, | 0 (0.0) | 6 (0.3) | 0.99 |
| Concomitant osteoporosis therapy, | 5 (4.7) | 103 (5.1) | 0.86 |
| Other current medications, | |||
| Corticosteroids | 2 (1.9) | 63 (3.1) | 0.48 |
| Anticonvulsants | 4 (3.8) | 62 (3.1) | 0.68 |
| Psychoactive medications | 0 | 2 (0.1) | 0.99 |
| Creatinine clearance (mL/min), mean (SD) | 74.8 (26.73) | 70.0 (26.72) | 0.08 |
| EQ-5D | |||
| Mean total score (SD) | 0.55 (0.311) | 0.57 (0.297) | 0.41 |
| Mobility, | 0.05 | ||
| With problem/extreme problem | 83 (82.2) | 1,497 (77.1) | |
| With extreme problem | 10 (9.9) | 91 (4.7) | |
| Self-care, | 0.94 | ||
| With problem/extreme problem | 54 (54.0) | 1,049 (54.1) | |
| With extreme problem | 6 (6.0) | 134 (6.9) | |
| Activities, | 0.97 | ||
| With problem/extreme problem | 71 (71.7) | 1398 (72.6) | |
| With extreme problem | 19 (19.2) | 387 (20.1) | |
| Pain, | 0.25 | ||
| With problem/extreme problem | 60 (59.4) | 1242 (64.1) | |
| With extreme problem | 5 (5.0) | 55 (2.8) | |
| Anxiety/depression, | 0.66 | ||
| With problem/extreme problem | 39 (39.4) | 755 (39.0) | |
| With extreme problem | 2 (2.0) | 72 (3.7) | |
| Thermometer (VAS), mean (SD) | 67.7 (16.75) | 65.7 (17.97) | 0.26 |
| Place of residence prior to qualifying hip fracture | 0.99 | ||
| Private residence | 94 (88.68) | 1,790 (88.57) | |
| Otherb | 12 (11.32) | 231 (11.43) | |
| History of active dementiac | 2 (1.89) | 133 (6.58) | 0.07 |
BMI Body mass index, SD standard deviation, ITT intention to treat
aBased on a univariate logistic regression model to test if a factor was associated with the index hip subtrochanteric fracture
bAssisted living, skilled nursing facility, rehabilitation center, acute care hospital, other, missing
cDementia, dementia Alzheimer-type, senile dementia, or vascular dementia
Concomitant osteoporosis therapy at the time of index fracture (ITT population)
| Therapy preferred term | Subtrochanteric hip fracture ( | Other hip fracture ( |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 5 (4.7) | 103 (5.1) |
| Estrogens, conjugated | 0 (0.0) | 24 (1.2) |
| Calcitonin, salmon | 0 (0.0) | 21 (1.0) |
| Estradiol, estriol, estrogens | 3 (2.8) | 29 (1.4) |
| SERM (raloxifene hydrochloride, tamoxifen citrate) | 1 (0.9) | 17 (0.84) |
| Calcitonin | 0 (0.0) | 4 (0.2) |
| Tamoxifen | 0 (0.0) | 3 (0.1) |
| Alendronate sodium | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.1) |
| Tibolone | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.1) |
| Risedronate sodium | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.1) |
| Etidronate disodium | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.1) |
| Medroxyprogesterone acetate | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.05) |
| Raloxifene | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.05) |
| Fluoride | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0.0) |
A patient with multiple occurrences of the same medication under one treatment is counted only once in that preferred term for that treatment. Preferred terms are sorted in descending frequency, as reported in the other hip-fracture group
SERM Selective estrogen receptor modulator, ITT intention to treat
Fig. 1Between-hip-fracture type comparison of change from baseline in a EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and b EQ-5D utility scores by visit (intention-to-treat population). a *P = 0.02, **P = 0.04. b *P = 0.006, **P = 0.025, ***P = 0.001. n number of patients with measurements at both baseline and postbaseline visits, CI confidence interval. Scale 0 corresponds to worst possible health and 100 corresponds to perfect health. Error bars show standard error of least squares mean (LSM). Value at end of study visit is hip-fracture type difference, i.e., the LSM difference of subtrochanteric hip fracture versus other hip fracture on the change from baseline. The P value is obtained from an analysis of covariance model, with baseline score, region, treatment, and hip-fracture type as explanatory variables
Fig. 2Proportion of patients with extreme problem in EQ-5D profile by dimension at end of study (intention-to-treat population). *P = 0.009. n number of patients with measurement for visit. P value obtained from Fisher’s exact test